Philosopher Paul Grace says that when we pronounce a word there is a tacit understanding that we pronounce them for the delivery of information, or a specific message to the recipient, do not say more than what we need to say. If the reported some restaurants, as in cheap restaurants, the food is fresh, for example, ask about the reason that drives them to mention it, is there reason to believe that he is not it? In the food composition is also linguistic and psychological No doubt there are other aspects of the language of food often reveal the deep structures of the language and also self-aware. Can the names of some of the foods that show the components or whether mild or creamy or otherwise? That may seem unlikely. As William Shakespeare says in «Romeo and Juliet» in the words of Juliet: «The name is not only termed customary, just as the name of the rose, which expresses something. The expression the whole beauty and fragrance in the rose itself. » Juliet here reflect what we call the theory of tradition, which says that the name you give out any thing is what is traditionally agreed. …show more content…
Used types of «chips» expensive exile more than others, such as method of «not fried», «without dyes», it is also used comparative method more than others, too, like «less fatty» or «best ever» or «not like any other type ». And the use of this language thing that distinguishes it from other supports the theory of French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu, which says that the taste of the upper classes in the food has a role in distinguishing these layers from other Near them, just as it marked the potato bags themselves from other varieties. These classes are keen on eating rare and prohibitively expensive foods that lower classes find it difficult to