ipl-logo

Scientific Revolution Was Simply Another Set Of Theories And Another Form Of Accepting Knowledge To Be True?

1560 Words7 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The significance scientific revolution

Answer all five (5) questions with your own intellectual understanding of each topic:
1). Explain why you believe that the ‘Scientific Revolution’ was simply another set of theories and another form of accepting knowledge to be true, which differed from the previous form of belief. Present your understanding of this statement: The belief of ‘human knowledge’ and the ‘truth’ will change over time, be that fifty years, hundreds of years or even thousands of years – “nothing and nothing lasts forever.”

It is certain that scientific revolution is considered as another set of theories because it gets involved with the consecutive development of all branches of science no matter what physics, biology, chemistry, mathematics, or even astronomy …show more content…

Incessant changes in natural phenomenon leads to the real science aiming at finding the answer for explaining contemporary change of natural existence by depending on scientific experiment that needs to be done over and over again when the time passes. The real science greatly calls for repetitive experiment while allowing others to prove and test its validity in order to reach consistent results responsible for clarifying natural changes during that time. For instance, the medical scientists find it very obligatory to test the new medicine for curbing the spread of HIV of which the germs have been stronger, and more resistant to anti-virus drug when the time pass. HIV medicine can be effective for treating HIV virus today, but can be ineffective for curbing a new strain of HIV virus that is more resistant to the nature in the future. So, those scientists need to use repeated experiment in order to make people reliable on consistent results for treating a new strain of HIV virus. However, this scientific condition is extremely different from pseudo-science which wrongly claims itself as another branch of science without passing through scientific processes and experiment as well as being supported and corroborated by any scientific evidence and experiment. Pseudo-science does not at all depend on repetitive scientific experiment but simply on the old belief system that has never been proven and tested its reliability and validity. So, this pseudo-science is said to be dealing with ideology which is a set of normative belief as well as conscious and unconscious ideas and ideals, which are merely the imaginary ideas and existence of things relating to the real condition of existence. Both pseudo-science and ideologies have never been based on scientific knowledge, experiment, and processes

Show More
Related

How Did Jefferson Contribute To The Scientific Revolution

1728 Words | 7 Pages

The historical changes in thought and belief to change in social and institutional organization period, between the Polish astronomer Nicolaus Copernicus and Isaac Newton is Scientific Revolution. As many historians declare that, the Scientific Revolution began with Copernicus and ended with Newton 150 years later. The later half of this century saw minds such as Descartes, Newton, Leibniz, and Galileo begin to change scientific thought. The Scientific Revolution provide a good exercise for people think. The Scientific Revolution began during the 17th century and became a catalyst for a new philosophy, economics, politics and religion, that permeated every level of human society and placed the emphasis for change on humanity rather than intangible

Read More

DBQ: The Scientific Revolution

825 Words | 4 Pages

The scientific revolution made a vast impact on everyday lives, it caused computers, phones, and other items to be invented. This revolution has caused many conflicts, and with these conflicts it had changed the way people lived and made many people question life. The revolution had made many benefits for people and there were also some people that were harmed during this time. The scientific revolution had many different actions that caused wonderful objects to be invented and allowed people to know more about the world. Different actions were done to create the scientific revolution similar to when the societies developed conflicts, such as when Copernicus made the solar system, how the conflicts changed the societies by the church going against people, the people who experience harmed such as Galileo, and the people who benefitted from the change such as other boys.

Read More

Ap Euro Dbq Scientific Revolution

1254 Words | 6 Pages

The Scientific Revolution between 1500 and 1700 led way to radical changes in people’s view of the universe and their place in it. New technology and discoveries changed the world for the better but also worse, simultaneously. Radical phenomenons at this time were secular views of how the Earth is created and managed, ruler’s afraid of uprising, heliocentric views. The secular views changed religion and the people apart of it, rulers affected the limitations of scientists politically, and heliocentric view changed how people were socially. Along with this new technology and methods of science and medicine were introduced.

Read More

Scientific Revolution Dbq

158 Words | 1 Pages

The Scientific Revolution created conflicts that developed in societies with the birth of modern science. There were many disputes with modern science. Modern Science was distinctive from Science created previous to this era. “ In the 1500s and 1600s, some startling discoveries radically changed the way Europeans viewed the physical world,” (pg. 54). The Catholic Church did not like how the people were believing what these new scientists were theorizing and not what they believed.

Read More

Scientific Revolution Dbq Essay

1137 Words | 5 Pages

After the emergence of the Renaissance, the cultural rebirth of society, there was a revival of knowledge and a change in thought. The Scientific Revolution also began during this period and was a huge change in thought that started in 1543. The Revolution highlighted the importance of

Read More

Scientific Revolution Dbq

726 Words | 3 Pages

The Scientific Revolution showed that a rise in observations and conclusions became an acceptable source of knowledge and truth, where it had been less so in earlier

Read More

Scientific Revolution Dbq

526 Words | 3 Pages

The scientific revolution was a time that took place right after the Renaissance, the Renaissance was time period between the 1500’s and 1700’s where many were celebrating life and the start of a new period. During the Renaissance people started to question the beliefs of the Catholic Church. However, leading into the scientific revolution the church still mained their high power. This leads us to the start of the scientific revolution. During this time scholars started to challenge the views of ancient thinkers and the church.

Read More

The Scientific Revolution In The Elizabethan Era

1552 Words | 7 Pages

The Scientific Revolution “refers to historical changes in thought & belief, to changes in social & institutional organization, that unfolded in Europe between roughly 1550-1700” (Hatch). This revolution was a time to replace

Read More

Was The Scientific Revolution A Revolution Or A Conflict

616 Words | 3 Pages

This time period marked a change from trusting the Church for answers to using logic and science to explain how the world works. As a revolution is a change that leads to a new system or way of thinking, this makes the Scientific Revolution a revolution and not a conflict. Paragraph 1: The development of the Scientific Method The first way that the Scientific Revolution can be seen as a revolution instead of a conflict is in the development of the Scientific Method during this time period.

Read More

Scientific Method Dbq

557 Words | 3 Pages

The term ‘scientific method’ means a way of discovering things whether it’d be a phenomena or trying to gain new knowledge. Furthermore a ‘scientific method’ can also be used to correct or adjust old knowledge to better support a theory with new ideas or knowledge. The use of the term ‘Scientific Method’ first came in to use during the 17th Century in between the years of 1850-1855. The general difference between science and pseudoscience is that science is based on theories which can be altered if they conflict with experiments and evidence and can be supported by experiments of scientific methods, however pseudoscience less evidence based and more based on belief and stories told by predecessors and claimed to be real but lack the evidence needed to support them. For example a difference between Darwin’s Theory and ‘Ancient Astronaut theory’ is that Darwin’s

Read More

Essential Underpinnings To The Scientific Method

538 Words | 3 Pages

The scientific method presents an objective methodology for scientific experimentation that produces unbiased interpretations of the world and refines known knowledge. Two key concepts in the scientific approach are theory and hypothesis. A theory is used to make predictions about future observations. A hypothesis is a testable prediction that is arrived at logically from a previous theory. By defining the term broadly, experiments can include all observation-situations, both controlled experimental situations and uncontrolled field situations that can be called field experiments or natural experiments.

Read More

Comparing The Ethos Of Scientism And Postmodernism

251 Words | 2 Pages

Scientism is rational, and it claims that they are the only methodology to gain knowledge. Postmodernism critiques all forms of representations and meanings that claim transcendental and trans historical status. It also beliefs that the absolute truth does not exist. It rejects universal cause as a foundation for human affairs and it also states

Read More

Summary Of Steven Shapin's The Scientific Revolution

898 Words | 4 Pages

In Steven Shapin’s book, The Scientific Revolution, he described the massive scientific changes that occurred from the late 16th to the early 18th centuries. Shapin utilizes the scientists and their findings to demonstrate the changes that affected Western civilization. He describes his theory of the Scientific Revolution as he proves that the world has always had scientific advances. Steven Shapin states his thesis which influenced the modern world, that the Scientific Revolution did not happen during a single time period through the use of the three essential questions: What was known, How was it known, and What was the Knowledge for.

Read More

The Relationship Between The Scientific Revolution And The Enlightenment

745 Words | 3 Pages

The Scientific Revolution started a domino effect of people beginning to understand the powers they held. People could freely ask questions instead of indiscriminately accepting what they were told. A basic summary of this effect is written in the first paragraph of the Declaration of Independence, “When, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and assume among the powers of the earth…which the laws of nature and of nature’s God entitle them…” (p. 72).

Read More

Influence Of The Scientific Revolution On The Enlightenment

1346 Words | 6 Pages

Impact of the Scientific Revolution on the Enlightenment The Scientific Revolution as its name says was a revolution in science developed by different figures that shared their ideas and discoveries that would change forever the way humans perceive the world. All of these would influence the Age of the Enlightenment, an age where people started to think individually and differently. During the Age of the Scientific Revolution, scientists such as Isaac Newton shared inventions and discoveries with the world. Newton developed the Scientific Method that not only helped as a process for new findings, but also opened the mind of many thinkers whom started to apply reason to everything, a method that would change the world and define and start

Read More

More about Scientific Revolution Was Simply Another Set Of Theories And Another Form Of Accepting Knowledge To Be True?

Related Topics

Open Document