ipl-logo

Segregation In The 1920's

597 Words3 Pages

Segregation has always been something that everyone is against. It was mostly a big problem around the 1920’s. I think segregation is an unfair way of treating others. For example, everyone should be treated equally and even if people are from a different race, they are humans too and they should be treated like others. Another example is that they aren’t doing any harm to anyone which makes it more reasonable that they should have rights like others.Segregation is a bad thing and it can lead to many severe consequences like, having it as a daily basis and getting used to it which can cause change if it lasts for a long time. Segregation was seen in a daily bases and they had some rights taken away back in those times. For example, when they were trying to go to work or travel, they had to sit in the back of the bus and they weren’t allowed to sit in the front. This proves that they were judged based on small thing and they had to obey the law. This also states that every day they had to go through this routine. For instance, they were also not allowed to shop at certain places or go to certain places. Therefore, they had to go only …show more content…

As it says on the source, “It was not until 1954, almost 60 years later, that the Supreme Court overturned its own decision from Plessy v. Ferguson in a new case…” (Source 1) . Under those circumstances, people had to deal with segregation and unfairness for 60 years. Also, the more time that it was there, the more non equality to the nation. In the event that segregation lasted a long time, it made people be unsocial and uncommunicative. Accordingly, “ The Committee of Citizens, convinced Plessy to intentionally buy a ticket for a whites only car.” (Source 1). Thus, people would do their own stuff and be separated from other races. Given these points, segregation took 6 decades to become unconstitutional, which caused changes in the whole

Open Document