ipl-logo

Should Creationism Be Taught In Schools

523 Words3 Pages

As a member of the School Board, it has been brought to my attention that the subject of creationism and evolution are being taught in the classroom and “Concerned Parents” have an issue with these particular topics and would like for them to be eliminated from the curriculum. In regards to the School Board, we come to an agreement on keeping the subject of creationism because of the following reasons: diversity and freedom of speech.

Keeping the subject of creationism in classrooms brings diversity because it is important for students to know all ways of thinking. Creationism inspires, deliberations, and reassures students to articulate thoughts that help them develop skills that solely cannot be gained through a stringently academic education. The last reason as to why creationism should be allowed to be taught in classrooms is freedom of speech. Living in a society that allows people to express their views openly without fear of hostility as long as they do it nicely means that we will often hear things we disagree with. It is important for students to know and understand these views. …show more content…

The reason why evolution is taught in classrooms is it is a large part of science and is backed by many different sciences such as physics, biology, astronomy, etc. Evolution is a theory of change that accounts for the pattern of similarities and differences among living things on earth throughout the earth’s history and across all the habitats and biomes that exist or have existed in that history. (Petto, 2015) Evolution is a theory of occurrence of new varieties of life forms, not a "theory of origins" that accounts for how life

Show More
Related
584 Words | 3 Pages

Today it is “recognized as a leading work in natural philosophy and in the history of mankind” (Landry). Today it seems as if there is a price to pay when talking about this topic in public, especially in school classrooms, as many teachers and parents argue that the Bible’s literal interpretation of human development is supreme. Challenges facing the theory were found relevant in 23 states as well as seven foreign countries. In 2004 a challenge was brought up by the Kansas State Board of Education. Is evolution a matter of a theory or is it the subject of “true scientific controversy” (Tamblyn)?

Read More
572 Words | 3 Pages

In this court case, the state of Louisiana made a law that forbade the teaching of the theory of evolution in public schools unless the school were to teach the theory of creationism as well (“Edwards”). Though the law did not require the teaching of either of the theories, it did require one of the other if schools did decide to teach it (“Edwards”). Parents, teachers, and religious leaders seeked to prevent the forcing of this law (“Edwards”). Andrew Koppelman, the author of “Phony Originalism and the Establishment Clause,” says, “States are prohibited from

Read More
996 Words | 4 Pages

In Freakonomics, by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner, the reader is introduced to the idea that economics is everywhere and can be found in places where you'd never think of. The book explains that economics is the study of incentives, and shows how motives can affect human behaviors. It's broken down into different types of incentives-- economic, social and moral. Economists often change incentives to try to affect human behavior, though an incentive can cause unforeseen consequences. In Chapter 1, the authors use a daycare in Israel, where parents are charged a $3 fine if they're late picking up their kids.

Read More
1118 Words | 5 Pages

Arkansas passed an act “The Balanced Treatment for Creation-Science and Evolution-Science Art”. However in this case the court’s view was “the evidence is overwhelming that both the purpose and effect of Act 590 is the advancement of religion in the public schools. ”(Olson) As a result, this evidently shows the division between the teaching of evolution and creationism.

Read More
837 Words | 4 Pages

However, evolution is very important and should be taught in Biology classes because students need to understand how Homo sapiens evolve if they don’t believe in the biblical story. Everyone may not be Christian, so it’s important for students to get an idea or perspective of where we may have possibly come from. Whether it’s from the eyes of God or from monkeys it at least gives people a chance to choose what they believe, but as well as understand what they

Read More
989 Words | 4 Pages

However, all bias aside, we can see that there is more understanding of science and the scientific method than first thought. All things considered, the author recognizes that evolution is a theory, acknowledges the research science has done, as well as some of the observations arising from those findings, and encourages the student ask questions while keeping an open mind. They even seem to have a kind-of, sort-of grasp on micro and macroevolution. Now, we must ask why anyone with a basic understanding of these things would desire such a disclaimer and if there are warnings on any other education

Read More
2235 Words | 9 Pages

Overall, Creationism sounds like a children’s story while Evolution is very detailed, informative, and educational. Creationism confuses students and lures them away from their educational thinking process. In many circumstances, Creationism has refuted scientific theories and has unraveled the lot that science, in most schools has taught us about human derivation. Evolution and Creation are two of the most common theories of human origin, although numerous religious people believe in Creation, the bible’s timeline does not match up

Read More
484 Words | 2 Pages

If evolution is to be taught, so should creation. If teachers refuse to teach creation than you simply get teachers who are willing to teach both. Although if the school system isn’t willing to hire teachers with the desire to teach creation, then they shouldn’t be hiring teachers who want to teach evolution. It is simply an issue of equality and freedom of religion, students are being forced to learn things that contradict their own beliefs. Students will turn their backs on their beliefs because they start to question them.

Read More
139 Words | 1 Pages

Do you think K-12 schools (public and private) should be required to teach evolution? Why or why not? When I hear the word “evolution” I think about evolutionary theory, Darwin’s theory of evolution and the big bang theory since they’ve used scientific research and methods to cause a paradigm shift within all fields of science by answering long-held questions about how a variety of species used evolution to survive in different climates. I believe that evolution should be required to be taught in public and private schools because it will allow students to question natural phenomena that occur in nature and therefore they will begin to form their own hypotheses and conclusions in their personal lives. Teaching children evolution in K-12 schools

Read More
687 Words | 3 Pages

The question of whether evolution should or should not be taught in schools is one that has been pondered over for quite some time now, as seen in this week's additional reading "Re-reading Root-Bernstein and McEachron in Cobb County, Georgia. " While the article did allow me to see a scientist's view on the question, it did not change my thoughts on the subject. I believe that evolution should indeed be taught in schools. My reasoning behind this is because I think children and teenagers should be given all of the facts and taught about all of the possible theories, so that they are then able to make their own educated decision as to what they want to believe. It is for this reason that I also support religion being taught in schools, which has also caused quite the controversy.

Read More
955 Words | 4 Pages

Why is God taboo in science class? The Gallup poll was taken several times, and every time the results leaned towards a change in America’s education. Many people want Creation to be taught alongside Evolution, some even want Creation taught in exclusion to Evolution. While swinging from the current system to the exact opposite side, not teaching Evolution at all, would be a bad decision, Creation has a place in

Read More
636 Words | 3 Pages

Nuclear Power is the use of nuclear reactions that release nuclear energy to generate heat. It is produced by an atomic reaction, capable of producing an alternative source of electrical power to that supplied by coal, gas, or oil. A nuclear reactor creates energy through a chain reaction that splits a uranium nucleus, releasing energy in the form of heat. Fast breeder reactors, which use plutonium as fuel, generate more energy than they expend. Plutonium is not a natural element.

Read More
505 Words | 3 Pages

After understanding the concepts of evolution and creationism my vote goes to supporting Evolution. I would support evolution because students will be given accurate information of how different and similarities forms of life, the change in population, and the process of new forms of life came to be. This will bring out the best for our upcoming future because students will use the proper evidence in making more rightful decision that will actually help our society better than before. They would not make any decision that will be based off of religious belief and that is where creationism fall in. Creationism is more towards the religious belief that God has created the world and developed divine creation.

Read More
1062 Words | 5 Pages

Fundamentalist Creationists do not stop at just asking for Creationism to be taught in public schools, as mentioned before, sometimes they turn to extremes. First, it is beneficial to understand the basis on which Creationists attempt to discredit science. One of the most common misconceptions from Creationism is that it’s a suitable scientific alternative to the evolutionary theory. This is simply not true, as evident from the aforementioned infographic. Using this as the foundation for their argument, Creationists attempt to persuade not only school boards, but also the parents of children in school.

Read More
966 Words | 4 Pages

Students are encouraged to form their own opinions and think open-mindedly based on the information presented to them, yet in the topic of life’s origins, they are no longer being afforded this opportunity because of the ban on the teaching of creationism. Creationism should be taught in schools because it does hold validity with several well-respected scientists and utilizes evidence observed by scientific studies to accurately support its main aspects. Critics often dismiss creationism as a hoax that lacks serious thought and accreditation from accomplished scientists. However, several well-respected scientists agree with the theory of creationism as a rational explanation for the

Read More

More about Should Creationism Be Taught In Schools

Related Topics

Open Document