Nomadic tribes ruled in Southwest Asia throughout this period. The caste system existed in India from time of the Aryans but as Muslim populations began to enter into the region and take control, the caste system underwent changes. In the 11th century the caste system adapted to include the Muslim populations into the hierarchy.
Politics and social class in Classical China was quite different compared to Classical India. At this time, politics in the ancient time was mostly monarchy and created a strong bureaucracy. Monarchy in Classical China were mostly based upon of the fact of the dynasties. Some famous emperors from this time was Qin Shi Huangdi from the Qin Dynasty and Wu Ti from the Han Dynasty. Qin Shi Huangdi centralized government by putting his people and the system was based on loyalty, trust.
Australia and China are two very different countries with an almost polar opposite government structure, political systems and values. Australia is a constitutional monarchy whereas China is a single communist party state. It is arguable as to which system of government is more effective, considering it is involves other factors like social freedom, the quality of life and the economy. But comparing hand in hand, Australia’s system of government has proven to be more effective in all of these areas. Australia and China have many similarities yet differ greatly in political structure.
In the Classical Era, two influential empires emerged, Han China and the Roman Empire. Both were order-focused societies, which greatly supported the rise of these empires. However, Han China was built off the foundation laid by previous empires and already had a governmental precedent. In the end, both empires eventually fell due to a number of shared factors, one being the overextension of their land causing expenses to rise and borders to become vulnerable.
In the years 600 B.C.E. to 600 C.E., empires like Han China and Mauryan/ Gupta India shared resemblance in having patriarchal societies, but contrast in how they choose to control their empire through the use of laws, religion, military, and education. For numerous years, civilization has been led by men and Han Dynasty and the Indian empires are no exception to that concept. Men have been in power since 3500 B.C.E. when agriculture carved a road to social structures and inequality. For instance, in 206 B.C.E. to 220 C.E., the Han Dynasty had a series of men ruling over the empire: Liu Bang, Han Wudi, and even a two-year-old boy inherited the throne, however, Wang Mang took that position. All of them men, not all are even qualified to rule,
Politically, both governments were corrupt. Not always in the same ways, but in the ways that they were similar, it was bloody and dark. In the Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire, political figures were power hungry and ruthless to get what they wanted. In the Roman Empire, General Marius was elected consul 7 times in a row. General Marius was a valuable general but not a noble politician.
Society was a huge part of the Roman Empire and Han China. They both have similarities and differences when it comes to their societies. The clothing, social classes, and the role of women are very different but are similar in some ways. In the Roman Empire and Han China, the clothing was important to society.
Between the years 1450 and 1750, the world was changing at a rapid, breakneck pace. Across the globe, Europe expanded and colonialized, scientists and philosophers developed new ideas and inventions, and gunpowder empires formed and reached their peak. On such empire was the Mughal Empire, located in India from the 1500s to the mid-1800s. The rise of the Mughal empire surely highlights the altering political, cultural, and religious landscape of India. From 1450 to 1750, India underwent massive changes in government, culture, religion—paradoxically, religion and the caste system were the shred of continuity in India during that time.
The Chinese civilization from 100 C.E. to 600 C.E. rose as one of the major unified empires. While this society grew, there were aspects of culture and politics stayed the same but many changes also occurred. As the empire developed, family units and social classes remained stagnant. Despite these continuities, changes such as the popularity of Buddhism within society due to Indian missionaries and a shift in political rule occurred. During the time period 100 C.E. to 600 C.E. the family unit system remained intact despite the intellectual advances.
Rome and Han China, ancient history’s most remarkable civilizations, have many more profound ideals to teach people today than just their world-famous astounding engineering or fascinating cultures. The values of ancient Rome were simplicity, frugality, honesty, austerity and patriotism (PSR 47). Simplicity is the state of being uncomplicated. Careful and reasonable use of resources defines frugality. Honesty means to be sincere and truthful as well as fair in conduct.
Both Han China and Classical India used social structure systems as a method of political control. The caste or class a person was born into in either China or India, determined your position and status, unless under extreme circumstances would a person be lowered or raised in a caste or class. However, how people were placed into a specific social structure were very different. Han China developed a social structure based upon literacy, and Classical India introduced a caste system based on “occupation”.
In classical India and China, methods of political control of the Han and Gupta dynasty differed in the former’s centralization and the latter’s regionalism, however, they were similar in the utilization of strict social structures and the use of order proving belief systems for such control. Despite their differences. both the Han and Gupta used rigid social structures for control. In the Gupta dynasty, the rigid caste system provided order. In each caste, duties and roles were assigned to control the masses.
The peasants in both civilizations were the lowest in the caste system and the land-owners were top of the caste
NAME INSTITUTION AFFILIATION COURSE NAME COURSE CODE INSTRUCTOR’S NAME DATE COMPARING THE SCHOOLS OF THOUGHT IN EARLY CHINA AND INDIA When one looks at the Indian and the Chinese civilizations, they are very similar but have different dispositions.
Thesis: Religion, namely Hinduism, influenced the social hierarchy in the Indus River Valley tremendously by making Brahmans the highest social class, motivating people to do good for better karma, and providing each social class with its own role to play in the society. Paragraph: Religion allowed Brahmans to be the highest social class. This is evident because in the caste system of the Indus River Valley, Brahman, the highest class, are the priests and academics. Directly below Brahman are the Kshatriya, which is composed of kings and warriors.
