Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Caste system in india and china
Compare india and china caste system
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Caste system in india and china
Compare india and china caste system
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Nomadic tribes ruled in Southwest Asia throughout this period. The caste system existed in India from time of the Aryans but as Muslim populations began to enter into the region and take control, the caste system underwent changes. In the 11th century the caste system adapted to include the Muslim populations into the hierarchy.
Politics and social class in Classical China was quite different compared to Classical India. At this time, politics in the ancient time was mostly monarchy and created a strong bureaucracy. Monarchy in Classical China were mostly based upon of the fact of the dynasties. Some famous emperors from this time was Qin Shi Huangdi from the Qin Dynasty and Wu Ti from the Han Dynasty. Qin Shi Huangdi centralized government by putting his people and the system was based on loyalty, trust.
In the Classical Era, two influential empires emerged, Han China and the Roman Empire. Both were order-focused societies, which greatly supported the rise of these empires. However, Han China was built off the foundation laid by previous empires and already had a governmental precedent. In the end, both empires eventually fell due to a number of shared factors, one being the overextension of their land causing expenses to rise and borders to become vulnerable.
In the years 600 B.C.E. to 600 C.E., empires like Han China and Mauryan/ Gupta India shared resemblance in having patriarchal societies, but contrast in how they choose to control their empire through the use of laws, religion, military, and education. For numerous years, civilization has been led by men and Han Dynasty and the Indian empires are no exception to that concept. Men have been in power since 3500 B.C.E. when agriculture carved a road to social structures and inequality. For instance, in 206 B.C.E. to 220 C.E., the Han Dynasty had a series of men ruling over the empire: Liu Bang, Han Wudi, and even a two-year-old boy inherited the throne, however, Wang Mang took that position. All of them men, not all are even qualified to rule,
Politically, both governments were corrupt. Not always in the same ways, but in the ways that they were similar, it was bloody and dark. In the Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire, political figures were power hungry and ruthless to get what they wanted. In the Roman Empire, General Marius was elected consul 7 times in a row. General Marius was a valuable general but not a noble politician.
Society was a huge part of the Roman Empire and Han China. They both have similarities and differences when it comes to their societies. The clothing, social classes, and the role of women are very different but are similar in some ways. In the Roman Empire and Han China, the clothing was important to society.
Between the years 1450 and 1750, the world was changing at a rapid, breakneck pace. Across the globe, Europe expanded and colonialized, scientists and philosophers developed new ideas and inventions, and gunpowder empires formed and reached their peak. On such empire was the Mughal Empire, located in India from the 1500s to the mid-1800s. The rise of the Mughal empire surely highlights the altering political, cultural, and religious landscape of India. From 1450 to 1750, India underwent massive changes in government, culture, religion—paradoxically, religion and the caste system were the shred of continuity in India during that time.
The Chinese civilization from 100 C.E. to 600 C.E. rose as one of the major unified empires. While this society grew, there were aspects of culture and politics stayed the same but many changes also occurred. As the empire developed, family units and social classes remained stagnant. Despite these continuities, changes such as the popularity of Buddhism within society due to Indian missionaries and a shift in political rule occurred. During the time period 100 C.E. to 600 C.E. the family unit system remained intact despite the intellectual advances.
Rome and Han China, ancient history’s most remarkable civilizations, have many more profound ideals to teach people today than just their world-famous astounding engineering or fascinating cultures. The values of ancient Rome were simplicity, frugality, honesty, austerity and patriotism (PSR 47). Simplicity is the state of being uncomplicated. Careful and reasonable use of resources defines frugality. Honesty means to be sincere and truthful as well as fair in conduct.
Rome (750 BC – AD 500) and China (350 BC – AD 600) experienced conflicts not only in the physical sense, such as in wars, but also in political struggles, religion, and power. Although each civilization had similarities, like structured governments in the form of emperors and dynasties, they also had differences, like in the way they wrote laws and dealt with handing out those rules. Religion was still going through changes of rules, while certain countries starting grasping ideas of new ones. War kept on brewing up between common enemies, causing battles against who should take over certain land parts. Finally, politics, with ever popular emperors and empresses coming about while other major ones dying off, causing civil confusion and conflictions.
Both Han China and Classical India used social structure systems as a method of political control. The caste or class a person was born into in either China or India, determined your position and status, unless under extreme circumstances would a person be lowered or raised in a caste or class. However, how people were placed into a specific social structure were very different. Han China developed a social structure based upon literacy, and Classical India introduced a caste system based on “occupation”.
In classical India and China, methods of political control of the Han and Gupta dynasty differed in the former’s centralization and the latter’s regionalism, however, they were similar in the utilization of strict social structures and the use of order proving belief systems for such control. Despite their differences. both the Han and Gupta used rigid social structures for control. In the Gupta dynasty, the rigid caste system provided order. In each caste, duties and roles were assigned to control the masses.
Australia and China are two very different countries with an almost polar opposite government structure, political systems and values. Australia is a constitutional monarchy whereas China is a single communist party state. It is arguable as to which system of government is more effective, considering it is involves other factors like social freedom, the quality of life and the economy. But comparing hand in hand, Australia’s system of government has proven to be more effective in all of these areas. Australia and China have many similarities yet differ greatly in political structure.
Cheerleading is more than an attitude sport or flirts in skirt. Cheerleading is better than dance for multiple reasons. Cheerleaders have to memorize dance routines, put up other girls in a stunt, and communicate without talking. People argue that cheer isn’t hard or that it 's not a sport. Some would even say that dance is harder and more of a sport then cheer but if you think about it cheerleaders have to have trust in each other, be loud, positive and encouraging.
While, in India, especially during the Gupta period, the social structure was more influenced by Hinduism than by trade. Particularly the caste system which was a type of static social order based on occupation, which placed priests or Brahmins at the top of the social pyramid. Regardless of how one’s income might grow as a result of trade, one’s position in society would always remain the same. (dont use one! how to