Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Court system in criminal justice
Criminal justice court system
Criminal justice system in the usa
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Court system in criminal justice
Criminal justice court system
Criminal justice system in the usa
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
For the most part I agree with the writer idea. I like what the writer said how the justice was served by the court. Kinkl murdered 4 people and attempted 26 murder case, so he deserve 112 years to be in prison. Even though Kinkl has a mental disorder problem, he was a danger to the community and needed to be watched by the government for the public safety. The audience can clearly see what happened on the Kiniakl cause from the court report that is presented.
I believe that the prosecution built their case knowing that James Earl Ray had escaped from prison and they knew he hated black people. Then finding out later that he had obtained an illegal passport and other items, the prints on the rifle, plus statements given by witnesses. The clothes, the binoculars and the receipt that was left behind at the hotel, then later, the white Mustang that was abandoned in Georgia was enough evidence against Ray.
Despite many of the family members and other townspeople who undeniably claimed that Walter could not have committed this crime because he was with them the entire day, the police refused to accept these alibis. Bryan met with many of his family members and these concerned community citizens, willing to answer any questions they had about the trial processes, in hopes to soothe their worries and fears. He was beginning to spend more time with Walter and appreciated this time spent, as it provided a brief distraction from the stressful realities of the case. One man eventually came forward claiming that witness, Bill Hook’s statement that he had seen Walter’s car was in fact a lie because they had been working together all that day. This man, Darnell, was then arrested for what the state claimed
As you are shown in the film, after the identification of Brenton Butler and his so-called testimony to investigators, the police and prosecutors just stopped working on the case. Thus, evidence that would have supported Butler’s innocence and help find the actual killer weren’t discovered until Brenton’s defense attorney, Pat McGuinness did some investigation and research of his own. Thus, flowing from film from the trial to McGuinness’s investigation scenes shows the how he attained the information that he and his partner could present in the courtroom. While the prosecutors only had the one eyewitness, who claimed to have only caught a glimpse of the shooter and gave description that did not even match Butler. The film presents the conclusion that the police did not actually do the work to find the actual killer and if it wasn’t for Pat McGuinness and his partner wanting to find the culprit, it would never actually be solved.
However, the justice system failed and I couldn’t understand how the trails were not taken seriously. How You Get Sentenced before proven guilty? How could someone be given the death penalty without getting the evidence you need to be sure? How could you be satisfied with the real person who did the crime being free? And the person who didn’t being charged for
He was taken directly to a prison and held there for a time. None of the reasons for arrest were good or true reasons. As far as the crowd, they were very rowdy in throughout all of the trials. As far as similarities
In the case of David Cary and Elizabeth Gombert, this cannot be said. During the trial,
The media heavily influenced the public perception of the suspects in many ways, one way was by influencing potentially the potential jurors of the case with commentary of satanic cults. In Paradise Lost 3, there was a small portion talking about a juror that had the belief that these kids were guilty of the crime of killing the small boys before even seeing the evidence at the trial. It would be safe to assume that this juror was heavily influenced by what he saw on the news and the rumors caused by the
The similarities between the two works is remarkable. Garbo and Aelsk both use techniques that were common in high renaissance. The use of In the Renaissance era, especially High Renaissance era, many artists were able to gain prominence by creating artwork with new techniques that enhanced their work. The discovery of new sciences, and mixture of math in art, really allowed the artists to create irreplaceable masterpiece. Two of the artists were Raffaellino del Garbo and Pieter Coecke van Aelsk, who really flourished in Renaissance by creating paintings that used multiple techniques, and connect to the viewer spiritually and emotionally.
18 “Since 1989, there have been tens of thousands of cases where prime suspects were identified and pursued—until DNA testing (prior to conviction) proved that they were wrongly accused” (Innocence Project). There may be thousands of other innocent people in prison who are wrongfully
Similar situations could be prevented by only placing a person on death row if there exists irrefutable, incriminating evidence, such as DNA evidence or camera footage. The use of DNA analysis in modern day death penalty cases has almost nullified the chance that an innocent person is put on death row, as such evidence or the lack thereof guards an innocent defendant against perjury (Bradbury, "The Death Penalty Affirms the Sanctity of Life"). The tragic story of McMillan also indicates the biased perception of the local courts that condemned him; he had already been framed as a vicious murderer by the media and, at that time, was predisposed to a conviction of capital punishment simply by being a black man in Alabama. However, today’s review of capital punishment cases by both state and federal courts makes such a bias highly unlikely. The compounded effects of only considering cases with incriminating evidence
Over the years, new equipment and methods had been created to help determine whether those charged with heinous crimes are innocent or guilty but before that and even now innocent people are being sentenced to death for crimes they
Furthermore, the old man turned himself in admitting to the murder, so he has to be charged. Whether or not he will be convicted depends on the judge and jury.
Is murder caused by deliberately shooting a weapon still considered a heinous act when the target remains unknown? In 2013, the South African athlete, Oscar Pistorius was accused of killing his girlfriend. Pistorius claimed not-guilty and declared his version of the scenario with the jury. However, the evidence had its own story to tell. Oscar and his girlfriend were in bed
Instead, the film did a very good job at showing both sides. They showed the graphic scenes of the crime that Matthew committed as well as sharing those gruesome details. But, they also showed how Matthew was a very scared human being at the end. He was crying and admitted he was scared then finally confessed to his crime. I think the film did an amazing job at presenting both sides and allowing the viewer to decide their own opinion whether they are against or for the death penalty.