ipl-logo

Social Inequality In Ancient Egypt

981 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Ancient egypt social system essays

Egypt’s social hierarchy created a stable, well-ordered society, as seen through a clearly visible status of people that ensured survival and success of society, massive social inequality, that stimulated the development of a more complex society and state, and beneficial social norms, regarding the everyday life, customs and beliefs, which were a great foundation for people’s morals and duties and helped the society to run smoothly. Social status was clearly displayed and was a requirement for survival and success of society. For example, “since the Egyptians believed that the Pharaohs were gods, they entrusted them with many responsibilities, such as political, religious, social, economic, military and legal commitments.” (The ancient Egypt …show more content…

The wealth distribution was very much divided between The King and the privileged class, and the ordinary people. For example, “The Pharaoh, who was separated from his subjects, together with the richest people underneath him (priests, nobles) led a luxurious lifestyle. They lived in palaces, had many prized possessions and ate the finest food. In contrast, most Egyptians lived in poor homes with a very low hygiene; they battled and died from countless diseases “(The ancient Egypt (Handbook to Life) / Pg.138.) The King and the wealthy class were in a constant demand of more wealth and resources; they wanted to surround themselves with the finest art, demanded bigger and more luxurious palaces, etc. As a result of their constantly increasing demands, labourers and craftsmen were striving to be better in their work and implement new ideas in their products. Manufacture in the cities increased; at the same time very wealthy men gradually transformed themselves into local rulers, who developed a more complex administration in order to meet the needs of the growing economy. All of these actions led to the altering of the

Show More
Related
972 Words | 4 Pages

Both civic establishments created inflexible social chains of command with a solid political ruler at the top, trailed by a decision made out of political guides and other government authorities, clerical class, and an expert class of dealers and other talented laborer and skilled workers. A large portion of the general population framed a worker class of unskilled workers and ranchers. At the highest point of the social pyramid of Egypt was the pharaoh with the administration authorities, nobles and clerics beneath him/her. The third level comprised of the recorders and warriors with the white collar class in the fourth level. Laborers were the fifth level of society with slaves making up the most reduced social class.

Read More
434 Words | 2 Pages

As a result, a social hierarchy formed with the pharaohs becoming the absolutists and the lower classes being in order, the nobles, scribes, merchants, and lastly slaves. As a consequence of the hierarchical system, Egypt reaped the same benefits as Caela and a single leader government allowed for stability due to the same dynasty ruling for several years. Some examples of this successfully occurring in ancient Egypt were the pass of power between to Tutankhamun from his father Akhenaten after the previous pharaoh’s death. Both Caela and Egypt had distinct social classes with the leaders being the elite and pharaohs, respectively, and the other less powerful classes below them including slaves and merchants. This happened as a result of the importance of religion and that they reflected that these individuals were closer to the gods.

Read More
454 Words | 2 Pages

Ancient Egypt was a civilization whose greatness resonates today. Territorial expansion, philosophical understanding of the afterlife, and the erection of monuments so that for all time, this greatness would be known. From 1479 to 1213 B.C., three Egyptian pharaohs exhibited greatness by breaking rules expanding the territory Egypt controlled, and celebrating their Empire’s immense power. These great pharaohs knew his or her personal strengths and used the power of the throne to achieve greatness directly aligned with those strengths. Hatshepsut, Egypt’s female self proclaimed pharaoh, exercised her influence away from the military, which had been the focus of the leaders before her.

Read More
227 Words | 1 Pages

The Pharaoh was the supreme leader not just of the government, and also of the religion. In Egypt there are people called Viziers. They were the chief overseers of the land. They were a part of the well-organized in Egypt. Like everyone else in

Read More
1044 Words | 5 Pages

There was an unpredicted rise in new industrial and agricultural technology that would increase productivity. In the factory, the invention of the Bessemer blast furnace and Siemens-Martin open hearth process would decrease the amount of hard labor and transform the way steel was made. While in America’s offices’s, business communication would be revolutionized with typewriters, following the use of calculators. As a result of the growing industries came an influx of new cities being developed. This expanding infrastructure started sewing back a growing number of laborers and new goods to increase supply of capital.

Read More
476 Words | 2 Pages

The social life under Ramses stayed the same throughout all the pharaohs. The social structure in Egypt was extremely solid: everyone knew where they stood in society and most accepted their position. At the top of the tree was the pharaoh, an almost god-like figure who stayed apart from his people. Underneath him were Egypt's social elite, the nobles, who effectively governed Egypt for the

Read More
934 Words | 4 Pages

In Ancient Egypt and the Aztec empire, there was a social pyramid with the least wealthy people, the slaves, at the bottom. (“Aztec Social Structure”), and the ruler at the top. In Egypt, this was the Pharaoh (Gill and Troolin). And in the Aztec empire, this was the Tlatoani (“Aztec Political Structure”), similar to how the Central Registry has just one person at the top while there are many who are inferior to him (Saramago, 1).

Read More
812 Words | 4 Pages

Social Inequality in Roman History Throughout the course of Roman History we see the development of the patron/client relationships that affect both the political responsibilities of the patrician class toward those who are under their jurisdiction, along with how society interprets their roles and rights determines the actions of those who benefit. In order to understand how the systems of inequality played out into the political and social aspects or Roman life is it important to know a few definitions. In Rome there were two main categories of people.

Read More
1091 Words | 5 Pages

Big cities soon became engulfed with millions of people all wanting to find work, providing owners of factories

Read More
1043 Words | 5 Pages

In Ancient Egyptian cosmology, Amon-Ra represents natural life on earth, while Osiris is related to the social and spiritual life on earth and in the afterlife. The contrasting features of these gods demonstrates a larger theme in Ancient Egyptian cosmology -- opposite and unequal elements that unite as parts of the same whole, This idea was the foundation of Ancient Egyptian society. Under the supreme leadership of the king or pharaoh, a division of administrators and officials were selected to oversee the daily operations of the state and maintain social order. This system caused social inequalities that kept the majority of the population poor.

Read More
454 Words | 2 Pages

These aristocrats had many privileges and paid little or no taxes. Society in this time was a hierarchy or pyramid. The king was at the top of the pyramid, then the upper class or aristocracy beneath him, then the middle class or the bourgeoisie, and

Read More
1188 Words | 5 Pages

The ancient Egyptians believed that people and nature are ruled by powerful gods. As Taylor says in his book “Death and the Afterlife in Ancient Egypt”, the Egyptians believed that the universe consisted of three types of beings: the gods, the living, and the dead. Egyptians connected everything happening in their life in terms of relationship between

Read More
931 Words | 4 Pages

Ancient Egypt was the first civilization to allow people to change social class. In Egypt, one could change into another social class, most times it was by marriage, but sometimes it could be from merit. Most times, in other river valley civilizations, people from different social classes rarely interacted. Ancient Egypt being the only ancient river civilization allowing social interaction between all classes was of great importance and a major achievement for the

Read More
833 Words | 4 Pages

I have not ill-treated servants. I have not belittled a god.” From this quote alone, it is evident that people of Antiquity, such as the Egyptians, valued good character and family. It was important for a man to do what was considered just and good in accordance with their community’s given laws. Individuals were taught the importance of strong family relations.

Read More
1016 Words | 5 Pages

2. Economic and legal standing Both the Roman and Egyptian societies in the ancient world were predominately ruled by the male gender, men were the rulers and lawmakers, in ancient Egypt, however, women were their own mistress and were accorded the same legal rights as men from the same social class. When it came to property and locus standi, women in Egypt enjoyed similar freedom in performing legal acts as women do in today’s modern society. All landed property was passed down through the female line, from mother to daughter. Egyptian women, irrespective of their marital status, could inherit, buy, and sell property.

Read More

More about Social Inequality In Ancient Egypt

Related Topics

Open Document