ipl-logo

St. Thomas Aquinas Argument For The Existence Of God

661 Words3 Pages

St. Thomas Aquinas is the author of a piece called the The Five Ways which discusses five ways to prove the existence of God. Aquinas’ second way to prove the existence of God is through the concept of efficient causation, the belief of an object that brings a thing into being or initiates a change. In this paper, I will argue that Aquinas’ argument for efficient causation is consistent; however, his belief that there is one first cause, God, is not entirely supported.
Aquinas begins his argument by proposing that everything that is known to exist has been caused to exist. By the same token, nothing that exists can be the cause of its own existence. Therefore, any natural object in existence has been caused to exist by something other than itself. This suggests that every efficient cause would need its own efficient cause, hence, an infinite chain of efficient causes would have to exist. However, the existence of objects that cannot cause themselves implies that there must be a first cause. This first cause must then be supernatural since natural objects cannot cause themselves. This supernatural first cause is believed to be God. …show more content…

Still, Aquinas does a great job of staying consistent in his argument for efficient causation and not straying into fighting for his belief in God. Aquinas simply holds the position that everything has a cause, while also claiming that there is something that has no cause which people believe to be God. It is my personal belief that objects that come into existence need a cause and because of my faith and religion I choose to believe that God is that first cause. For this reason, I choose to support and argue for Aquinas’ argument of efficient

Show More
Related
347 Words | 2 Pages

The knowledge that there is a disease with the potential to not only match butpossibly eclipse the detrimental nature of HIV is mortifying to say the least. The articleSex Superbug Could Be’ Worse Than Aids’ written by Mark Koba states that in 2009 adiscovery was made in japan while screening a women for sexually transmitted diseases. What was discovered was a strain of Gonorrhea resistant to antibiotics known as HO41.This strain of Gonorrhea has been categorized as a superbug grouped among diseasessuch as HIV. However the implications of this disease are far worse than HIV for severalreasons. The article Sex Superbug Could Be’ Worse Than Aids’ written by Mark Koba informsyou about the typical ailments that Gonorrhea can typically cause if not

Read More
1022 Words | 5 Pages

In William Craig’s ‘kalam’ version of the cosmological argument he argues that “the universe has a cause of its existence.” His argument relies on two crucial premises which state that “whatever begins to exist has a cause of its existence” and “the universe began to exist” (Craig). In this paper, I will begin by breaking down Craig’s take on the cosmological argument. I will then propose an objection to his argument that questions why there must be a cause of the beginning of the universe, and furthermore, why this cause must be God. I will conclude with a response Craig would give to this objection.

Read More
1168 Words | 5 Pages

As being a theist, I find Aquinas 's fifth argument significant because the universe is in a perfect order: the cycles of life and death, the seasons of the year, and the mysteries of the human body can 't be just simply explained by science. This order and balance is not unplanned or random. The world and everything in it has been created with a perfect plan by all knowing and all powerful "God". Despite of Aquinas 's fifth argument being one of the most prominent argument for the existence of God, there are some limitations to the fifth argument. The expected limitations especially from the atheists can be applied to this argument due to its nature in the fact that it’s inductive, meaning we can never be 100% certain of its correctness.

Read More
1648 Words | 7 Pages

Therefore, this paper is in response to McCloskey’s arguments with a theistic view, in support of God’s existence. McCloskey (1968) suggests that the arguments given are why theists believe in God but states that these arguments do not support a belief in God (p. 65). We cannot “prove” with absolute certainty that God exists. God, and His sovereignty are far greater than what our minds could ever comprehend.

Read More
871 Words | 4 Pages

The objection addressed the validity of the argument which had the premise 1, nothing is the efficient cause of itself except God and premise 2, a chain of causes cannot be infinite. The argument thus concludes there must be a first cause. This conclusion agrees with my thesis that Saint Thomas Aquinas’s argument formulated in the second way leads to a valid argument, which concludes that there must be a first cause and that God

Read More
988 Words | 4 Pages

All other natural causes are just occasional causes. Malebranche gives many different arguments in favor of his idea. Most importantly, the argument from ‘no necessary connection’ which states, “there are no necessary connections between events involving only creatures. Therefore, there are no true causes in events involving only creatures.” He uses this argument heavily in favor

Read More
569 Words | 3 Pages

Since the beginning of the earliest civilizations, humanity, not just philosophers, has faced the ongoing debate of whether or not such a thing as God truly exists. Among one of the many renown philosophers in history, Thomas Aquinas, a medieval thinker, proposes an argument in favor of God’s existence, developing five different proofs of what he considers solid evidence. Aquinas’ five ways serves as the most efficient and convincing argument to prove the existence of God not only because of its incorporation of universal objective truths, but also through its application of common human experiences to develop logos and pathos, respectively. Aquinas’ first three proofs greatly hinge on consistent and undebatable concepts that logically flow and thus appeal to the mind’s need for rationality. For example, his Argument from Motion and Argument from

Read More
492 Words | 2 Pages

Fong-Wei Ting Mr. Mahoney Apologetics November 24 2014 Key Arguments for and against the existence of God God is defined as the perfect and all-powerful spirit or being that is worshiped especially by the Christian, Jews and Muslims as the One who created and rules the universe.1 There are many people who do not believe in a God, and with a lack of faith, they argue against the existence of God and are proving something that is completely false or unrelated. There are a large number of reasons proving God to be real. This essay is to prove the existence of God, and within this essay are twelve reasons that prove God does exist.

Read More
1797 Words | 8 Pages

In this essay, I will set out to prove that Thomas Aquinas’ First Cause Argument does not show that God exists and the conclusion that God exists does not follow from the premises of the first cause argument. I do think that the conclusion is valid and could be sound/or has the potential to be, but the premises fail to provide the basis upon which to reach such a conclusion. Hence, I will be raising some objections to the premises and will try to disprove any counter-arguments that could be raised in its defense. This would be done by examining Aquinas’ First Cause Argument and trying to disprove it whilst countering arguments in its defense.

Read More
688 Words | 3 Pages

In his writings, Thomas Aquinas’ formulates arguments and objections against certain topics. This paper will mainly target his beliefs and objections on God and philosophy. Elaborations will be made on his views on God’s existence and whether or not there can be an infinite regress. This will be covered as well as explaining what evil is and how God and evil are related.

Read More
1444 Words | 6 Pages

There have been an innumerable amount of arguments for the existence of God for hundreds of years. Some have become much more popular due to their merit, and their ability to stay relevant through changing times. Two arguments in particular that have been discussed for a very long time are the ontological and cosmological arguments. Each were proposed in the period of the high middle ages by members of the Roman Catholic Church. They each have been used extensively by many since their introduction.

Read More
82 Words | 1 Pages

Saint Thomas Aquinas’ following cosmological argument states the notion that there is a divine being that is the uncaused first cause. Cosmological arguments follow the belief that a divine being that acts independently of all rules therefore is the exception to all rules and is responsible for the creation of the time. The following argument has to have both true premises and a true conclusion to be considered sound and the first step to figure that out is to write a

Read More
945 Words | 4 Pages

St. Anselm and Descartes are known for presenting the first ontological arguments on the existence of God. The word ontological is a compound word derived from ‘ont’ which means exists or being and ‘–ology’ which means the study of. Even though Anselm and Descartes’ arguments differ slightly, they both stem from the same reasoning. Unlike the other two arguments on God’s existence (teleological and cosmological), the ontological argument does not seek to use any empirical evidence but rather concentrates on pure reason. The rationale behind this school of thought

Read More
1784 Words | 8 Pages

The traditional claim of all Cosmological Arguments is defined as “something outside the universe is responsible to explain the existence of the universe” (PowerPoint 380). In the “causal argument,” or the First Cause Argument on the cosmological argument, “something” outside of the universe that is supposed to inform us about the existence of the universe is argued to be explained as God. As the first cause argument goes into depth and with the help of Thomas Aquinas, it is easy to see how God is responsible for explaining the existence of the universe around us. Within the first cause argument on the cosmological argument the following premises and conclusions are discussed: Premise 1: There exists things that are caused. Meaning that

Read More
915 Words | 4 Pages

Dominican philosopher and theologian, St. Thomas Aquinas, created the “Five Ways” of God’s existence – motion, causation, contingency, gradations, intelligence of design – in which the first two are cosmological arguments. Aquinas’s argument from motion states that it’s obvious some things in the universe are moving, and if they’re moving, something else must have caused them to move, and something else must have caused that to move… and so on. However, the pattern of movements can’t go on forever since there wouldn’t be that one thing that started the whole series. Therefore, there must be an “initial mover, an extraordinary being that started the universe moving but is not itself moved by anything else – and this being we call God,” (Vaughn, Lewis. Pg. 65).

Read More

More about St. Thomas Aquinas Argument For The Existence Of God

Related Topics

Open Document