An article in the Slate magazine, “A Conservative Case for Marriage”, concern debate between the author and the public in Alabama. The Author William Saletan, discuss about the existence of Homosexual couples in public because all this time the existence of homosexuality couples looked bad by public. The author says that homosexuality isn’t a sin because it occurs since they born. The author also says Homosexuality isn’t harmful because it’s not like paedophilia or sexual abuse. The author says if the sterile Couples can be accepted in public, why the homosexual couples not. The sterile couples and homosexual couples together can’t produce child. Probably the author only see in one side, the article is not completely can be accepted. Not only based on Conservative tradition but also Modern era.
According to Author Saletan, we as the public must accept the homosexual couples because they are likely sterile couples which can’t produce child. They aren’t choosing their destiny as Homosexual, but their mind about interesting to same sex is occurs when they are born.
…show more content…
It can’t be, because it isn’t a choice. It’s not like promiscuity or premarital sex or cheating on your spouse. It’s just the way some people are born”. Actually not all homosexuality people’s mind occurs since they were born. There are many cases that the homosexual people were born as heterosexuality mind. But in development stage, there is social influence which changed their social orientation. For instance, a child who was born as heterosexual gets the education pro homosexual, sexual tolerance, and legal tolerance of homosexual