I was also able to provide evidence of how the author are able to support their claim. I used the fact that Rifkin supported his argument by using facts on animal health. This activity also shows
The only major problem with the article is being outdated but most of the information and findings are relevant
Since the beginning of his campaign, President Trump has often portrayed himself as the victim of the liberal media and “fake news.” While every person should make a habit of checking their sources, it is my assertion that the media’s attitudes towards Trump have benefited him greatly. A common comparison somewhat alike to the chicken and the egg, is whether the media accurately represents events or creates them in their depiction. In my view both instances are present and valid in one’s attempt to analyse the media.
”1 This statement is just an assumption the writer makes in order to sway the readers to agree with is opinion. In order to verify this assumption the writer should provide some type of facts rather than his
Both “Donald Trump’s Sad, Lonely Life” by David Brooks and “The Art Of the Comeback: Donald Trump’ Debate W Propels Him Toward White House” by Matthew Boyle highlight the very intense presidential debates going on and illustrate how divided this country is. This election season has been one like no other so far with Donald Trump surprisingly winning the republican nominee even though he lacks much needed experience; versus Hillary Clinton whom most people expected to be the Democratic nominee and also has previous experience as the secretary of state. Both of these sources contain great favoritism and also contain a different purpose. This can be shown by the way that they describe the debate and how it reflects the media’s biased role by constantly presenting propaganda. Both of these articles are clearly biased and should not be used to decide on who to vote for; this is shown through their uses of rhetorical strategies such as tone, diction and audience.
I found this source to be credible because it is peer reviewed and well written. I intend on using this source as part of my research paper because it has good content and information related to my
Maureen Dowd’s article, “Game of Trump” (July 15, 2017), examines the “chaos” that consumes the current situation in American Politics, in which Dowd argues that the “chaos” results from Donald Trump becoming the president. Dowd uses a play on words to compare Washington to the fictional tv show, Game of Thrones. Dowd points out the critical flaws made by the president and his family in order to show Americans that if they pay close attention to the White House, they will see that Trump’s presidency is not beneficial to the country. Because the article’s content goes into politics and current events, in this case, criticizing Donald Trump’s presidency, Dowd writes for an educated audience that has a similar political bias. This article is significant
Which examples from the text represent weak evidence? Why is the evidence weak or strong? Explain your reasoning. (Remember the scoring guide asks you to analyze and evaluate three examples of evidence. You will need to remember how to quote, paraphrase, and cite your sources within the
Both Herbert’s and Staples’ articles have examples of claims with great supportive evidence and claims that are lacking evidence. An excellent example of a claim followed by supportive
What are the weaknesses of the author’s argument? For example, do you see any unstated assumptions or biases in the article? Is this a limitation to the author’s credibility? Why or why not?
By quoting many other professionals and studies, the author’s argument is simple, easily understood, and exceptionally
Society expect to be constantly entertained; they have become so concerned with things such as who the latest star is dating, scandals, or dumb people doing rather idiotic things. Much of society have been consumed in their personal instant gratification and what makes them “happy”. When on an off chance that news does show things that are serious and impactful(not necessarily positive things that is happening in the world) people have become so numb that the best they could do is feel sympathetic and at worst continue on with their day. The other part of the problem is that those behind what is being published and shown on the news media have been absorbed in their avarice nature, whatever allows them to make as much profit they do. “Writing thousands of hours of coverage from what could have been summarized in a couple of minutes every few weeks, a new rhetorical strategy was developed, or-let’s be generous-evolved”(6), Saunders describes the new formula formed by mass news firms that would yield the most profit.
However, the author used one anecdote to build up his theory and then continued searching deeper till he was able to find two more examples to anchor his point of view. With the lack of ethos as a rhetorical appeal or credible statistics, the author chooses to present the topic from a very personal perspective. In addition, an argument is normally discussed from different point of views. The author should have considered including counter-arguments and refuting them to make his article more
Climate change is increasingly recognized as a major challenge. It is widely accepted that the greenhouse gas emissions caused by humans are having a negative impact on the environment. The most important greenhouse gas, arising from human activity, is carbon dioxide (CO2). Virtually all human activities cause the CO2 emissions that lead to climate change. By using electricity generated from fossil fuel power stations, burning gas for heating or driving a petrol or diesel car, every person is responsible for CO2 emissions.
