ipl-logo

Summary Of J. Gay-Williams The Wrongfulness Of Euthanasia

576 Words3 Pages

In the reading of The Wrongfulness of Euthanasia by J. Gay-Williams, he argues why he thinks euthanasia is not morally acceptable and the possibilities of the reason behind for it to be naturally wrong to have or get euthanasia. Gay-Williams has multiple reasons on why we of a population should not have this and/or use it to our benefits or needs. As euthanasia is not actually passing away, but it can be like murdering. One of the reasons for euthanasia to be wrong is from the nature of here it all begins within the person. For humans to live their life is a natural impulse of why we endure to our living expectations that we have. Every human being is built to survive and live for what we are destined to within our life. No matter what we put our bodies go through every day, from cuts to major injuries the body goes through a system of self-healing. With the use of euthanasia, it impairs the natural ability to survive many outcomes. It works against the bodies survival ability from healing itself by taking out the mechanisms it uses. …show more content…

Death is an ultimate thing that is irreparable, as euthanasia can be a potential outcome to be used against our own means. Medication is a subtle reason that is used for the standard report of accomplishment. There can also be a simple wrong diagnosis of a sickness or illness. Passing is last and the shot of blunder excessively incredible, making it impossible to affirm the act of killing. Euthanasia would simply ensure their desires and rule out the marvelous recuperations that as often as possible happen. Also realizing that we can end our life whenever may well grade us to surrender too effectively. The will to live is solid in every last one of us, however it can be debilitated by agony and enduring and sentiments of sadness. The very nearness of the likelihood of willful extermination may shield us from surviving when we

Show More
Related
824 Words | 4 Pages

Euthanasia- Gay Williams Gay-Williams presents an opposing argument against euthanasia. This reading made me really think about my stance on euthanasia. I personally have mixed feelings on this topic. Gay-Williams states that euthanasia is “inherently wrong” and is starting to become more accepted. One comment I have is that as science is advancing and new remedies are created, this thinking might be changing for some people.

Read More
820 Words | 4 Pages

Firstly, to understand the full argument, you must understand the topic. As defined in the Merriam-Webster dictionary, Euthanasia is the act or practice of killing or permitting the death of hopelessly sick or injured individuals a relatively painless way for reasons of mercy. With that understanding it is hard to see why people who are terminally ill do not have the option of having a pain free death on their own terms. Even without a law, doctors have been aiding people to die for years.

Read More
691 Words | 3 Pages

Euthanasia comes from the Greek language and means “good death” also known as mercy killing. It a way of ending a person’s life in a painless way. There are many reasons why committing mercy killings are a horrible thing to do. There are also ways to prove that they can be something beneficial to the person that is experiencing it experiencing it. Some wise words from Lalit Kishore were, “Assisting death is no way precludes giving the best palliative care possible but rather integrates compassionate care and respect for the patients autonomy and ultimately makes death with dignity a real option”...

Read More
1491 Words | 6 Pages

Euthanasia: Ethical Dilemmas and Possible Solutions Euthanasia is defined by The Merriam-Webster dictionary as, “the act or practice of killing someone who is very sick or injured in order to prevent any more suffering (n.d.). This is a very controversial topic as ethical dilemmas are present when the possible contemplation of euthanasia exists. There are ethical dilemmas involved with a decision that involves allowing someone else to die. Ethical problems usually do not have a simple answer or often lead to an indisputable solution. Different views on the matter may provide potentially different outcomes.

Read More
537 Words | 3 Pages

Euthanasia has been one of the subjects that had been intensively debated with different views whether is right or wrong. As on the movie Sea Inside, where Ramon who was quadriplegic decided to kill himself in dignity but the government and church opposed since it is believed death should be avoided. People have the right to choose over their life, Euthanasia should be a way of supporting freedom for those who want to live and those who don’t, that have no capacity of living a fully life of their own. ‘Living’ and being ‘alive’ are two different things. Eudaimonia describes life of flourishing, a life in which a person is constantly striving for self-improvement, to be more virtuous, more wise, more thoughtful and self-aware and better (Aristotle).

Read More
1071 Words | 5 Pages

Peter Singer once said, “Of all the arguments against voluntary euthanasia, the most influential is the slippery slope: once we allow doctors to kill patients, we will not be able to limit the killing to those who want to die.” Euthanasia is the act or practice of killing or permitting the death of hopelessly sick or injured individuals (such as persons or domestic animals) in a relatively painless way for reasons of mercy (ProCon.org). In other words, it is a drug that is given to patients who have decided to take their own life to no longer be in suffering. Euthanasia should not be used because it devalues the human life, it contradicts the Hippocratic oath that is still used today, and euthanasia could be used to control health care costs.

Read More
937 Words | 4 Pages

Another issue with legalizing euthanasia would be that society would be too easily convinced to support it. "It would be hard to devise procedures that would protect people from being persuaded into giving their consent." (Foot, p. 112) There is no possible way to know if a person is giving their consent because they actually want to or maybe because they were persuaded to do

Read More
551 Words | 3 Pages

Patients who are terminally ill or those who suffer from incurable diseases can choose to get medical attention but that would be eventually futile since the person will not be saved. One would simply prolong the life of suffering and pain while spending a lot of money. There are thousands of cases involving a family has gone bankrupt to ensure medical care for a terminally ill person, or to keep up the treatment for an incurable disease. Prolonging such lives would only lead to heartache, financial challenges, and eventual futility. Instead, euthanasia allows peaceful death in a medically monitored environment.

Read More
1043 Words | 5 Pages

Some people who oppose euthanasia like to argue that euthanasia is selfish and it only benefits one person, while that is not the case, a counter argument could be made if it was. That counter argument is that at the end of the day, we live for ourselves and the decision of whether or not to go forward with it ultimately lies on the patient and no one else. Euthanasia can not only eliminate the suffering of the patient, it can also relieve the suffering of others who otherwise would only be awaiting the death of their loved one. Without the peaceful way out that euthanasia brings to patients, they could go through a lot more pain and suffering.

Read More
3125 Words | 13 Pages

Euthanasia is a highly controversial issue that entangle concerns over religious, moral, ethical and compassionate arguments. It is extremely ambiguous to draw a straight line of what is right or wrong because right to life or die is considered differently according to countries and states. There are some people who are terminally ill whether young or old, those who wish to end their lives because they suffer from unbearable pain or believe they are a burden on their family and friends. They ask for euthanasia but there are also others who condemn them that the act of euthanasia is a violation of a basic human right, a ‘right to life’. DEFINITION OF EUTHANASIA AND ITS TYPES Euthanasia can be defined as the practice of ending a life in a painless

Read More
2039 Words | 9 Pages

By definition of Oxford dictionary, euthanasia is defined as the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease or in an irreversible coma, in Greek culture, which originates from the words “eu” and “thanatos”. Together, these words mean the phrase “good death”. Euthanasia is one of the issues that has been the subject of intense debate over time. It has been a hot-button issue in human rights discourse as it also affects ethical and legal issues belonging to patients and health care providers. The ethical and legal perspectives of the concept of euthanasia are still widely under dispute in many countries of the world.

Read More
990 Words | 4 Pages

However, there can be other issue when euthanasia is legalised doctors can end up killing very ill patient without asking their consent or their families consent, in order to save money and free up hospital beds. All these situation shows how dangerous it can be if we legalise euthanasia it can lead into the legislation of involuntary euthanasia. There are religious argument against euthanasia , which is the sanctity of life. This means human life is sacred creation of God. Religious believers believe God is the only one that has the right to choose when human life should end.

Read More
652 Words | 3 Pages

Firstly, the patients themselves are not wholly willing to do it. Financial burden from health care cost and pain suffered would definitely contribute to the decision to perform it. As well as not wanting the family member to suffer with them. For those patients that are unable to decide for themselves, external pressure and low percentage of survival would lead to their unwilling death. Secondly, euthanasia will harm the family, the physician and medical staff.

Read More
1345 Words | 6 Pages

My second reason because Euthanasia can be abused. First of all, Euthanasia has already been abused in history (Griswold). One exemplification is, at the time of the Nazi’s. Nazi’s abused euthanasia to create a master race, by pretending to treat “imperfect” children but in reality killing them with Euthanasia injections, and lying that the children died during treatment (Griswold). Eliminating certain traits through killing the holders of the traits, or sterilizing them, is Eugenics.

Read More
1749 Words | 7 Pages

Imagine having to endure so much pain and suffering for a majority of your life that you would just want it all to end. Well, there is a way one can stop their own pain and suffering and it is called euthanasia. Euthanasia is the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease. The act may only be done solely to those diagnosed with terminal illnesses such as cancer, aids, and heart disease. Many people agree with the idea of euthanasia as it can help those who are suffering be stripped of all the pain they are enduring.

Read More

More about Summary Of J. Gay-Williams The Wrongfulness Of Euthanasia

Related Topics

Open Document