In "Anarchism: What It Really Stands For," Goldman points out the myth of anarchism. Anarchism is impractical, and it stands for violence and destruction, so it must be rejected as dangerous. Anarchists believe that the state is unnecessary because order and social harmony can arise naturally and spontaneously. They also view the state as evil because it goes against the principles of freedom and inequality. On the other hand, anarchists do not believe in laws because human knows what is good and bad and how to act appropriately in the society.
Jared Diamond is a professor of Geography at UCLA, a Pulitzer Prize winner, and the director of 2 environmental organizations: the World Wildlife Fund and Conservation International. Diamond is also the author 6 books, including “Collapse: How Societies Choose to Succeed or Fail” from which the chapter “The World as Polder: What Does It Mean to Us Today” is taken. In this chapter, Diamond shows us that we have a lot to learn from the ancient civilizations that failed before us. He explains how globalization has increased the risk of national breakdown, how the polder concept can help us minimize the clashing of differing interests and live together as one community, and how he practices cautious optimism when he views the now bleak future.
It is very probable that Machiavelli would view the United States as also employing multiple methods of population enhancement. The forceful methods may be to passively or quietly create wars or warlike atmospheres in other lands. Once this war has destroyed a neighboring land, the United States could possibly open their doors to the refugees from that land. In a today’s global economy, the term neighboring land is used for the purposes of this paper to encompass any place on the globe. Peaceful population acquisitions tend to be the more publically accepted ways in which population enhancement is conducted.
ompany, 1901. 89247. Print. A Social Control: A survey of the Foundations of Order i s written by Edward A. Ross, who was born on December 12, 1866 and died on July 22, 1951.
Recently, there were discussions with President Trump’s decision on cracking down which illegal immigrant is currently living in the US. And that if they have a criminal record, they will then be deport them back to where they come from. But what most would not think of the different outcomes that would intake. Through these philosophers Hannah Arendt, Mill Stuart, and Hobbes beliefs, we are able to see the connections to this current political issue.
Evaluating Arguments Around Liberal Peace Theory Democracy is the form of government most prevalent in the world today, and has been mostly unchallenged since the end of the Cold War, when Communism collapsed as an opponent. It is built upon certain shared ideals and cultural norms which, when looked at as a whole, mean that democracy is a more peaceable system of governance than any others, less likely to declare war upon other democracies. So says Liberal Peace Theory, but how accurate is that? This short paper will evaluate various arguments surrounding Liberal Peace Theory and critique them.
So the question is: The ‘Age of War’: will it end or endure? My argument is that, the ‘Age of War’ will never end and conflicts will only endure. Conflicts are changing in their nature (dynamics, conflict actors, complexity, scale, etc.) but they still will pre-vail. To support my argument, we will initially look at the types of the conflicts, their causes and intensity in the past sixty years and will explore in more details one of the dominant reasons for conflicts – fighting for natural resources.
The world is going through a change, in terms of both economic and social development and this in turn has affected the way societies have functioned. Societies are becoming increasingly aspirational because of the effects of globalisation; consumerism has increased and so has the demand for all products, the disintegration of the Soviet Union in 1991 and the end of bipolarity has brought in more markets and has expanded the global economies. People have shifted to the idea of capitalism and social democracy and have realised its benefits, while this has helped in the expansion of global wealth, it has also led to market hegemony and neo-colonialism by certain countries in search for resources. The end of bipolarity has opened up space for US hegemony that has had both its pros and cons. Where US hegemony and action has ensured restoration of Human Rights and its safekeeping along with the opening of new markets, the very same policies have turned radical and have antagonised a breed of people who have found its actions unjust.
76). Even in 1930 Dewey was “alarmed by the growth of a corporate mentality in America”, and referred to the distortion of public opinion by mass media as the “eclipse of the public” (ibid., p. 76). When examining the state of democracy, elections are not the only signifier of democratic rule. Former UN secretary general Kofi Annan, when asked if elections were giving democracy a bad name, called for a deepening of democracy and said: “democracy is not just about one day every four or five years when elections are held, but a system of government that respects the separation of powers, fundamental freedoms like the freedom of thought, religion, expression, association and assembly and the rule of law …
national politics Adam Watson’s Evolution of International Society gave a new dimension in the understanding of international relations (IR). He deeply studied comparatively the formation of international society and political community of the past which has evolved into the modern world system in his ‘Evolution of International Society’. Unlike Kenneth Waltz views of anarchy as the only system in IR, Watson says there are two systems viz. anarchy and hierarchy. In between these systems is the hegemony which defines the contemporary IR.
The world in which Carr knew and wrote this book about may have change greatly, however I think one can say the world is once again experiencing s transitional moment where answers no longer suffice, and affirming this books continued relevance. To conclude, the book shows us how Carr was convinced the realities of Global Power and not Utopians normative morality would shape a new international order. Carr’s work can be understood as a critique of Liberalism internationalism or what he referred to as
He contends that when an individual or group is denied its major requirement for identity, security, acknowledgment or equivalent investment inside of the general public, extended conflict is inescapable. To determine such conflict, it is essential that needs that are debilitated be distinguished and along these lines rebuilding of connections or the social framework happen in a way that needs of all people and groups are suited (Burton John, 1991,p82). For instance, this model can be helpful in the cases of African conflicts, for example, that of Darfur, Burundi, Dr Congo and Rwanda conflicts, where there are limitations on opportunity and support of its nationals in political and monetary
African modes of thought, cultural structure, and ways of life were impacted by changes brought about by foreign invasion. Over the last several decades, no other country has struggled so intensely to establish basic government structures. Somalia’s instability originates partially from conflicts between the state structures imposed during the colonial era and the clan structures that traditionally play a heavy role in the lives of Somalis. The 1991 ousting of Barre lead a new era of conflict and anarchy from which the region has never fully recovered. In the absence of a central government, warlords and armed factions have violently conflicted for political and economic dominance.
As competition and tension between groups rise, so does the danger of conflict impeding on food production and putting any stores of food at risk of being stolen, as has been the widespread consequences violence in the region. Tribalist politics, as Ylönen argues, are creating more divisions amongst the population following South Sudan’s independence in 2011 because “clan-based “tribalism” as one of the crucial obstacles for nation-building.” The violence becomes a perpetual cycle of periods of aggravation, armed conflict, and intermissions due to the severe divides amongst the population. People are motivated to take up arms against other tribes or clans in fear of losing their livelihoods, fighting back against forces associated with the state, obtaining resources for personal survival or enrichment, and even in fear of falling victim to the violence itself. These social divides are putting the population at risk of succumbing to mass starvation, similar to the food shortages in South Sudan during previous bouts of conflict.
Rather more, rising concepts within the field such as; human security which has been adopted by the West’s analysis of how to promote violence reduction, particularly in conflict zones and fragile states. Taking a step further and securing the population, that was by the “Modern counterinsurgency doctrine (COIN)” which is based on the idea that successfully securing a population and immunizing it against unrest requires serious and extensive strategies in the realm of governance, development, and security. of course, counterinsurgency is not the language used by the development community. The preferred labels in the development and peacebuilding lexicon is that of the so-called ‘security/development nexus’. Ending in a holistic global stability being sought is to be underpinned by justice, equality, and self-determination.
