ipl-logo

Summary Of Why Nl Is Bad For College Sports

1544 Words7 Pages

Do you believe that college athletes should be allowed to benefit from their name, image, and likeness (N.I.L.)? The big talk of all college athletics is whether or not players should be allowed to get paid and accept sponsors for N.I.L. Giving the players the ability to receive money while still in college dates back to the early 2000s. The conversation started mostly with college video games being able to use the players and their names without their permission or any pay. Many lawsuits were filed against several different college video game companies like EA Sports. The company was no longer allowed to make video games that involved any player's name. In the article, Why is NIL bad for college sports? Written by Noa Saxton. The author lists …show more content…

In college sports, there have been multiple good arguments as to why it should be allowed and why it should not be allowed. In the article “Why NIL is bad for college sports”, Baxton lists several reasons why he believes in N.I.L. is a bad thing and what it could lead to. Firstly, he states that there is a concern that teams can become too uneven and unfair to others. I believe that it could create a more level playing field and provide better entertainment and competition. Secondly, Baxton says that there is a fear that players will have more of a focus on their sport rather than their education. Although this could happen, I don't believe this has anything to do with N.I.L. as it's been happening for years. There are many instances where players are taking easier classes just to get the grades to play sports. Lastly, he states “Another concern is that NIL could lead to a loss of team cohesion and a focus on individual success”. I can't entirely agree with this statement because I believe the main characteristic that scouts look for is their ability to get along with others and have good teamwork. Not only does this help get looked at by scouts, but it will also help teams win and everyone wants to

Show More
Related
1154 Words | 5 Pages

One person who thinks strongly about this is Steven Salzberg. Salzberg is a student at University of Maryland. He wrote an article called Get Football Out Of Our Universities. In this article, Salzberg talks about how football should be taken out of colleges. His reasoning is because, football players who get a

Read More
1740 Words | 7 Pages

The incorporation of NIL into college sports presents a chance for meaningful reform that has the potential to impact generations of student-athletes, and it is important to approach this issue with an open mind and a willingness to find common

Read More
286 Words | 2 Pages

Student athletes are being ridiculed and looked down upon by their peers. The N.C.A.A. restricts an athlete to 20 hours of practice a week; this does not include weight training or voluntary activity. Athletes do have a lower graduation rate but this does not account for transfers or players

Read More
1918 Words | 8 Pages

II. NCAA Amateurism rule and the problems with it The NCAA was established on the principles of keeping collegiate athletics on the amateur level. This meant that no one could play on programs on collegiate level with people from professional teams or other leagues. The NCAA argues that amateurism is necessary to preserve academic integrity and ensure that receiving a quality education is a top priority (Treadway, 2013).

Read More
730 Words | 3 Pages

However, others worry this might change how college sports work and whether everyone will have the chance to get treated fairly. Choosing a college isn't just about the money athletes can make from NIL deals. It's about finding a place where they feel supported and can grow as individuals and athletes. It emphasizes the importance of considering factors like their relationship with the coach, their role on the team, and how the school can help them succeed in the long run. While NIL is exciting, it shouldn't be the only thing athletes consider when picking a college.

Read More
1712 Words | 7 Pages

The article written by Jay Bilas was conveniently written a year after the NIL deal was approved for NCAA athletes. That being said it was written in a time period when you could see the impacts and changes

Read More
802 Words | 4 Pages

Branch described NCAA as unorganized conglomeration, “built of a mixture of noble and venal impulses”, claiming that it, “enshrined amateur ideals that it was helpless to enforce”. Branch describing Walter Byers, a key founding member, “He wore cowboy boots and a toupee. He shunned personal contact, obsessed over details, and proved himself a bureaucratic master of pervasive, anonymous intimidation”. This ad hominem attack of Walter Byers is not representative of what kind of values he holds and undermines his ethos as a leader. Byers was the one created the phrase “Student-Athlete”.

Read More
956 Words | 4 Pages

The controversy derives from the leading division I college basketball and football programs because they are the only ones who make enough money to pay the athletes. Small division I, division II, and division III programs do not make money; many of them

Read More
3294 Words | 14 Pages

For decades, athletes have contributed significantly to the economic success of their institutions and the NCAA without receiving a share of the profits. These athletes dedicate countless hours to training, competing, and representing their schools, often at the expense of their academic pursuits and personal time. Yet, while coaches, administrators, and the NCAA itself have benefited financially from the athletes' efforts, the athletes have been prohibited from earning any income related to their athletic achievements. This imbalance has long been a point of argument, with critics arguing that it exploits young athletes and denies them their rightful earnings. The NIL policy helps correct this imbalance by providing athletes with opportunities to earn income through endorsements, sponsorships, and other commercial ventures.

Read More
1046 Words | 5 Pages

College athletes being paid by NIL/ others creates many opportunities for everyone, including college athletes. The article “Maryville” suggests that colleges will have more money because of NIL/other money due to colleges making money from the athletes. This will then lead to more opportunities for other things. This is significant because when colleges have more money from the athletes making more money, they can put it into other things like academics and more.

Read More
949 Words | 4 Pages

NCAA problems have been around for as long as the NCAA has. College athletes do not get the education the government claims they pay for. College athletes have constant practice throughout the day, some even more than one. They travel throughout the US to other colleges, barely having time to make up work or go to class. Not only

Read More
1745 Words | 7 Pages

Also, Steve Weiberg, writes in "NCAA Stands Firm against Professionalism", that, "competitors are a necessary part of the understudy body, in this way keeping up an unmistakable line of partition between school games and expert games (Weiberg). " A reasonable detachment is required between the expert and school level. School is for learning and the expert level is work. Without school competitors being beginner it would change the business viewpoint at the expert level. It would transform it by bringing about a draft out of secondary school for universities to draft players and purchase them and afterward they would need to do it once more once they choose to leave school (Wieberg).

Read More
850 Words | 4 Pages

Furthermore "NCAA data shows that only 16.2 percent of the spending at Division 1 schools goes to student aid and the rest goes to salaries, game expenses and facilities" (Mitchell). This type of data shows how the priorities of the players have nothing to do with serving them, but more so improving services to win games that bring in revenue. Lastly, at Northern Kentucky University they couldn't afford a new house center for the nursing program, but they were able to expand to Division 1 sports.

Read More
697 Words | 3 Pages

to

Read More
806 Words | 4 Pages

They never complete their education, and this is causing colleges to question the so called “one and done”. They believe that making freshman ineligible to play would help prevent this problem of drafting players’ right out of high school. Professionals say that making freshman ineligible for playing their freshman year would help them socially, educationally, and allow them to have a normal college life. Some even believe this might convince more athletes to stay in school instead of jumping up to the pros so quickly

Read More

More about Summary Of Why Nl Is Bad For College Sports

Open Document