ipl-logo

The Framers Should Not Support The Modern-Day President

497 Words2 Pages

The Constitution that the framers desired is drastically different than what it represents within a modern-day presidency. This essay’s main focus is on why the framers would not support the modern presidency, and a real-world example, from the modern presidency, which the framers would dislike. The framers of the Constitution did not want the president to be influenced by any outside sources, which include the demands of the people. However, the modern president responds to the popular demands of the people. The modern-day president is usually influenced by majority public opinion. This is what the framers wanted to avoid. Furthermore, the media has perpetrated the intense coverage of the president. The media shapes the way the public thinks about the president and this makes it …show more content…

The framers wanted the president to almost be the leader behind closed doors. It was meant for the president to make the rational decisions instead of those based on what the media and the public thought were the correct decisions. (Miroff, 2017)The framers wanted to keep the president apart from the many institutions that make up the apparatus of the government. However, in the mind of the public, the president is supposedly the one that can unanimously make all of the decisions. These American citizens personally bestow all of their hopes and fears directly on the president. This is what the framers wanted to avoid as well. They thought of the presidency as being one of the three branches of government. Both the House and the Senate are just as important in making any substantial change. Therefore, since the president is the figurehead of the government they have to play by the rules in order to act like any real

Show More
Related

Rise Of The Plebiscitary Presidency Summary

438 Words | 2 Pages

In The Rise of the Plebiscitary Presidency, Professor Craig Rimmerman argues against the “plebiscitary presidency”, where the president governs through the direct support of the American people. Rimmerman argues that the Framers of the Constitution assumed that the legislative branch would serve as the central policymaking role. The modern plebiscitary presidency has been shaped by the tremendous amount of personal power drawn from the people through the Supreme Court and Congress. Rimmerman argues that the consequence of a presidentially-centered form of government that Neustadt and other scholars failed to recognize is that presidents will strive to meet the expectations that come with the new presidency to the extreme, where they will exert

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of President Woodrow Wilson: The Modern Presidency

578 Words | 3 Pages

president or other members of the government to have to rely on popular oratory. They did not believe the president should constantly be on trial by the court of public opinion for everything he said. They wanted to “establish institutions which could operate effectively without the immediate support of the transient opinion” (242). The modern presidency is entirely different than what the founding fathers intended it to be.

Read More

Summary Of The Federalist Paper No. 67

1289 Words | 6 Pages

Hamilton stresses the importance of balanced power, as well as the involvement of all branches in both local and national agendas (Gais). Hamilton wants to make clear that democracy is completely different than a monarchy in the fact that the president, who is chosen by the people, will never become some type of superior human. The United States is one of the first nations to practice democracy, so there was no country to look towards as a model. This made Hamilton’s job difficult because he had to encourage Americans to trust the process of building a great nation. The other part of Federalist 67 comments about the president’s ability to appoint officials to vacancies in the government.

Read More

Segal And Spaeth's Argument Analysis

1314 Words | 6 Pages

Even with certain restrictions and checks of power the president still maintain some significant areas of power over congress such the ability to veto legislation passed by congress. This ability grants the president a significant amount of power over the legislative process in the U.S as ultimately he is able to set the agenda of the country’s political schedule, and determine the direction of the country’s political schedule. Along with the ability to enact vetoes without the interference of a hostile congress uncooperative congress. The president also posses the ability to set the agenda for what legislation to recommend to congress and to what priority level each recommendation should be given. This power does come with its limits though as most situations do not give the president the ultimate authority to force congress to address his proposal and he must instead convince congress to address his issue with priority.

Read More

Checks And Balances Vs Federalist 51

529 Words | 3 Pages

In the hundreds of years since the US was founded, the role of the President has changed dramatically. From the very beginning of the country to the complexities of the modern era, unexpected changes, including those that could not be predicted by the creators of our constitution, have happened. While the founders fancied a powerful executive, they also imagined that the presidency would work within the constraints set forth in the Constitution and with cooperation with the other branches of the government. This is very clear in the US Constitution as well as Federalist 51, which are the foundations of this country. To begin with, the power of executive orders has expanded the oversight of the role of the President.

Read More

Articles Of Confederation Dbq

151 Words | 1 Pages

The A.o. C made it so that the elected president would not have too much power

Read More

Explain What Were Our Founder's Intentions For Congress And Congressional Elections

288 Words | 2 Pages

This is one of our core problem you need to fix by informing people about this more over the presidency. Is there anything new regarding the overwhelming emphasis on presidents and presidential elections

Read More

Ap Us History Dbq Essay

1106 Words | 5 Pages

In the last years of their tenures, the earliest presidents of U.S. history were either confronted with new issues or haunted by old ones which lingered throughout their presidency. The leaders of the first 50 years or so of American politics left the American people with a legacy of both effective and ineffective approaches to foreign policy, state affairs, oppositions, and economic parabolas. However, as the end of each of the presidencies neared, the “consent of the governed” went unnoticed, and Presidents George Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, and Andrew Jackson struggled to create and uphold the values and individual rights as promised under the new Constitution. Out of all four presidents mentioned above, George Washington

Read More

Essay On Theodore Roosevelt Vs Andrew Jackson

1160 Words | 5 Pages

The role of the President of the United States of America is defined by those who have held the office. The vagueness of the Constitution has allowed the power of the office to grow and shrink with the personal differences of the men who have held the position. The presidency is not just effected by those who hold the position, the institutional environment and the society of the time also take a massive role in determining the power and effectiveness of the presidency. Theodore Roosevelt and Andrew Jackson are two of the most influential presidents because they were adored by the people. Roosevelt and Jackson both stretched the power of the presidency in ways that were never envisioned by the framers of the constitution.

Read More

An Argument For The Best Decision Of President George Washington

465 Words | 2 Pages

Before he was president, George Washington crossed the Delaware in the middle of the night to attack the British army even though his troops were tired, cold, and starving. In the end, George Washington’s men won the battle because of the decision made by their virtuous, devoted General. When it came to determining who would be the leader in this new country, he George Washington was the best option because he proved himself a good leader. George Washington did not adhere to his troops wishes, but pressed on in the fight because it was what was best for the country. In other words, presidents are not obligated to follow public opinion, two reasons for this being: presidents are not directly elected by the people and doing so could be a danger to society.

Read More

Include The Basic Constitutional And Extra Constitutional Roles Of The Office

1829 Words | 8 Pages

Describe the institution of the United States presidency. Include the basic constitutional and extra constitutional roles of the office and highlight those amendments that impact the presidency. The framers of the Constitution set aside ideas of leadership by an executive council in favor of one single executive. Though some were fearful of tyranny, most postulated that concentrating power in the hands of a president would create a more unencumbered and energetic government.

Read More

Presidential Limits And Restraints

231 Words | 1 Pages

The President of the United States has many powers. However there are a few limits and restraints that are in place to keep the president from too much power over certain matters. The president requires the consent and advice of the Senate on many subjects. An example of this is the failure of the Versailles Treaty in 1919. President Woodrow Wilson didn 't have the support of the Senate to negotiate a peace treaty.

Read More

Argumentative Essay: Federalist 70

1015 Words | 5 Pages

The American president, takes all the responsibility for what he does and he is watched by the other branches so there is no way that he can conceal or make mistake. Secondly, Hamilton asserts that there is the matter of cost. Some people recommend that an executive branch should be large. Thus, it will asks for more money to maintain that large council and that money is too high for a nation to be affordable. Lastly, before the Constitution was composed, keen men concurred that single presidency was a standout amongst the most outstanding elements of state

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of The Electoral College

1422 Words | 6 Pages

As the President of the United States you have many duties to your country. In an article written by the Lone Star College in there article “Reform for Electoral College” they infer that “The Presidency is considered the nucleus of the American political system.” Which supports the main disputes and why they exist, we need to know why this affect us, and if there were change what are the advantages/disadvantages. That’s why we need to be educated in the subject before we make any changes. In the next body paragraphs I will be showing many disputes and solutions, to help you make a decision.

Read More

Essay On The Power Of An American President

642 Words | 3 Pages

This is due to the power of the media, for instance the radio, TV and the Internet. Media has made it easier for the President to communicate with the people, and the modern presidency is a kind of media invention. This power however, doesn’t seem to actually come into action. It just makes people think the President is the most powerful man on the planet. In reality the power, or influence, is divided between more than just the three branches if government.

Read More

More about The Framers Should Not Support The Modern-Day President

Related Topics

Open Document