Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Diversity in the us military
Strategies in managing diversity
Effective communication across cultures
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Northrop Grumman has published a Corporate Responsibility Report on an annual basis since 2007, highlighting its goals and accomplishments in diversity and inclusion. Their 2015 goals included creating an inclusive environment through awareness and leadership training and increasing women and people of color in leadership roles. In response to their goals, Northrop Grumman redeveloped their employee survey used to measure Northrop Grumman’s efforts at creating an engaging and inclusive environment. The results provided managers insight into more effective ways to address diversity and inclusion among their immediate reports. Future generations have not been overlooked in Northrop Grumman’s diversity goals.
The Spartans believed that the youngest men in the army should defend the older and more experienced military men especially well. Although their “knees are no longer nimble” , it is apparent that the Spartans valued the wisdom and experience that seniors brought to the battle field nearly as much as their fighting ability. Through rank structure, this notion holds true today in nearly every armed forces organization. The longer a member devotes his life to the organization, along with the achievement of certain qualifications, the higher rank he achieves. Each rank has fewer members than the last, presenting seniors with a sense of reverence from the junior personnel.
Human Resources Sergeant in the Profession of Arms Commanding General, General Martin Dempsey asked a central question that frames the major challenges the Army’s leaders’ face. He asked, “How do we create the specific conditions for, and achieve those key attributes that ensure that the Army is a profession – one in which all Army professionals recommit to a culture of service and the responsibilities and behaviors of our profession as articulated in the Army Ethic?”. As Professional Soldiers, we exhibit traits that reflect that of what it means to be a Profession of Arms. It wasn’t until post-Vietnam when the Noncommissioned Officer Corps was truly recognized as professionals. Throughout the years with post-wars, the traits of being a professional has exhibited more so in today’s operating forces after nine years of war.
The United States military was the first organization to end segregation and integrate, with the U.S. Army and the U.S. Marine Corps being the first two to fully integrate they became the shining example that the American population should have followed. What caused the Army and Marine Corps to become the first to integrate is because of the way there are both structured and controlled. The military is an organization that if rules are not followed then people are either kicked out, put in jail, or possibly even killed. When joining the military one gives up a certain amount of freedoms that allow the machine to work properly, and with the loss of freedoms comes a command structure that demands orders be followed with no questions asked. With
The military is diverse now, but there was a time when it wasn’t and the people had to fight for it. In 1948 that had changed because of President Harry Truman. President Truman and others had written a document that changed the military diversity.
As a military training instructor, I had the privilege to train young men and women from all over the world. According to Kinicki, Fugate (2016), diversity pertains to our individual differences that make us unique. Generally, the airman I trained put aside their differences and start working together immediately if they wanted to graduate from basic military training. Furthermore, I told them why it was important to work together, I rarely had a problem in my dorm. “There are, it may be, so many kinds of voices in the world, and none of them is without signification” (1 Corinthians 14:10, KJV).
A shift in balance during war times will cause a shortfall in necessary needs of the Army. Another way an HR Sergeant can affect the balance of the Army is by keeping the “Army’s culture, climate and institutional practices” and passing them on to future Human Resource leaders. A good leader leads by example and teaches their subordinate the correct way to keep the Army a professional
Organizational diversity is a concept where an institution upholds diverse values owing to the differences in race, experiences and religion, among others. The composition of people from different backgrounds constitutes diversity. In the contemporary society, institutions are required to respect and nurture diversity. Diversity helps in bringing exchanges between people with varying experiences and backgrounds. As such, it results in positive benefits that enable the society to live harmoniously.
The Army as an institution has historically comprised primarily of men. Soldiering was a traditional male role. Some issues discussed over whether diversity and gender integration is that women’s inclusion in the service will change the Army culture. The Army belief system disrupts by the new women inclusion policies established by the Department of Defense. Gender integration is an important factor of influence in terms of opportunities and career progression for women.
Influential leaders balance the long-term needs of the Army, the near-term and career needs of their subordinates, and the immediate needs of their unit's mission (1). The Army Leader Development Strategy states that "successful leaders recognize that continually developing their subordinate leaders is the key to the long-term health of the Army" (5). [1] The Army intends to develop its soldiers in the operational, institutional, and personal domains (2). These domains allow individual soldiers to control their career development with the guidance of their chain of command and the Army progressively and sequentially. The fundamental truth is that soldiers accomplish tasks because they do not want to let each other down (1).
This means we must communicate clearly and consistently with each other, train together, trust each other, and allow for Soldiers to be human every so often. As leaders, we often forget the challenges we faced as junior professionals, and we also don’t always know what is going on with the commands or Soldiers we support that may be making mission accomplishment challenging. The culture we instill within our Human Resources operations can either contribute to a climate of teamwork and taking care of Soldiers, or it can contribute to toxic leadership. It is up to us, as Human Resources Sergeants, to embody the Army Ethic, which consists of “the moral values, principles and martial virtues embedded in its culture that inspire and regulate ethical behavior by both Soldiers and the U.S. Army in the application of land combat in defense of and service to the Nation.” (The Profession of Arms, 2010) We must be the example for and instill confidence in our leadership, our peers, our subordinates, and our customers, the Soldiers.
This paper aims to explain why diversity is essential within the Army and the many benefits that stem from having a diverse Army. Diversity is an important asset in the military because it allows for a greater range of perspectives and ideas from various backgrounds. In the Army, diversity helps to create an environment of mutual respect and understanding that enhances the military's effectiveness and efficiency. Diversity also promotes a positive work culture that is inclusive and equitable for all military members. Many changes have been implemented to help modernize many different aspects of the Army.
The knowledge that I gained through cross culture in the class is being able to contemplate all the culture with different aspect of life from different country in the world. I will be able to understand why cross culture is important to military operation and will be able to use them in a daily basis in my military career. The Army are in a diverse culture that every soldier bring something that will enable us to work together. It will help us to understand the situation and be able to work one another with the same aspect and result. Being able to work with different branches will enhance my ability to work better in a Joint Operation.
Studies have been conducted to determine the effects of diversity in healthcare administration. Diverse leadership is associated with improved patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes, reaching strategic goals, and successful decision making. The individuals who responded believed that minority leadership gaps could be closed with positive diversity gaps and giving equal consideration for leadership positions to all applicants. In addition, although diverse candidates for healthcare leadership have grown over the past few years, respondents did not see the same growth in their respective organizations. (Witt/Kieffer, 2011) Diversity leadership is important in healthcare organizations as it will lead to numerous benefits.
If Shell decided to keep the no diversity policy in the TMT despite all the efforts to encourage diversity mindset of the managers, to promote supportive environments and to provide guidelines for hiring and promotions, minority employees would start to lose confidence in the D&I initiatives seeing that there was still a barrier between them and positions in the upper echelon. Voser, however, might be able to defend his choice of the composition of TMT that there were not enough qualified managers with minority status at the senior level (Sucher & Corsi, 2012, p. 11). Nonetheless, since Shell had been promoting the D&I projects for quite a long time, in the long run, the employees’ confidence would depend on the composition of the TMT, which theoretically should reflect the more diverse pool of the TMT