ipl-logo

Government Invasion Of Privacy Essay

719 Words3 Pages

"In America today, the spread of ideas and content has increased in volume, speed, and impact. This can largely be attributed to the advent of the internet. This ability to instantly interact with people anywhere in the world has allowed for immense progress, but can also pose a moral and legal quandary about its use and presence. Should our government be able to monitor our actions for the ""common good""? Or should Americans ' Constitutional rights remain protected from government encroachment? I believe in the latter.

A government functioning within the norms of democracy does not have the obligation to monitor the internet, or at least any more than it already does. The internet serves as everything from an outlet for creative expression to an information accessing tool for millions. Although it can and is used to promote or perform illegal activities, we cannot choke the liberties of the American people in order to weed out the few wrongdoers. Observing internet activity is akin to the function of a police state, disrespecting the fundamental rights of Americans. If the internet is a reflection of our real lives, isn 't it obvious government monitoring is an invasion of our privacy? Although the Constitution does not explicitly state our right to privacy, the legal precedent (through several Supreme …show more content…

As the internet becomes a crucial entity in our everyday lives, it should remain free of intrusion and censorship from the state to safeguard our liberties. Independence of thought and action has been a hallmark of the American way, an example to other countries for nearly 250 years. Keeping track of internet use is contrary to the spirit of our government and Constitution. Whether it be the practicality, legality, or principle of watching the digital actions of the American people, our entitlement to liberty should extend to protect us as private

Show More
Related
2313 Words | 10 Pages

Because technology is continually growing, new laws are being passed regarding technology and confidentiality. This article questions the “invasive” internet searches and looks for a constitutional answer. As of now, no electronic device can be confiscated and searched without a warrant. This could prove to be beneficial for Arnie. If he was to report Mr. Bowen’s suspicious data to the police, they would be able to obtain a warrant to officially search Mr. Bowen’s computer.

Read More
1180 Words | 5 Pages

American’s rights over government protection Are Americans being blindingly controlled by our own government? Today, there is a controversy to whether or not government should be allowed to monitor phone calls, emails, and internet searches for the purpose of investigating terrorist organizations and plans. Although it’s important to remain protected, giving up our rights to our government isn’t an acceptable proposition. Due to our government’s suppressing amount of power and secrecy, it is eccentric for us citizens to allow the government to violate our fourth amendment by breaching our privacy. We have one right that protects us Americans from unreasonable searches and that is the fourth amendment of the United States.

Read More
520 Words | 3 Pages

One Constitutional principle that would be threatened by regulation of the government would be popular sovereignty. Democracy was a government founded for and by the people, and those people would have to vote in their respective states to have this law be implemented. This isn’t really a problem, since Congress or the mayor would have to propose a law that would satisfy the people enough for them to pass it. The government should have sufficient involvement in the internet to ascertain security threats, address security threats, eliminate security threats to the American people. We live

Read More
594 Words | 3 Pages

With the world population being 7,259,902,243 people, a grossly huge amount of people use the Internet, the number being 3,366,261,156 people worldwide. That ends up being almost half of the population, the percentage being 46.4% I one hundred percent disagree with the “decision” of the government ridding of the Internet entirely, as if that isn't clear enough already. Though the government might find the termination of the Internet useful in some circumstances, I have no doubt that it may result in riots, violence, protests, and more in order to get it

Read More
1277 Words | 6 Pages

The U.S follows a different school of surveillance. Despite the fundamental right to be held “innocent until proven guilty”, it monitors everyone until proven innocent. The status quo could of course damage America’s long known liberties granted by the Constitution. Recent revelations by whistleblower Edward Snowden, have confirmed that the government is more likely to cross some constitutional lines in the name of national security. “The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (FISA) regulates the government’s acquisition of any electronic surveillance within the country for foreign intelligence use.

Read More
952 Words | 4 Pages

On one side people believe that the NSA’s surveillance of American citizens was constitutional since the internet is not physical property and that the internet is public and everyone can use it that it. The Fourth Amendment also only protects the physical belonging of the citizens within their homes, and since the internet is not a tangible item that the actions of the NSA did not violate anyone’s rights as an American. Another piece to the argument is that the internet is not technically in anyone’s home or a physical piece of property. This supports the previous argument that the NSA is not taking anything from anyone or physically disrupting anyone’s peace by looking through people’s whereabouts online. Some also argue that is a safety issue as a reason to excuse the NSA’s action.

Read More
1189 Words | 5 Pages

In 2008, President Bush signed into law The FISA Amendment Act, an act which allowed the government to monitor Americans’ electronic devices. Bush claimed that this Act could help save lives, as mentioned before, but what he did not mention is that this allows the government to conduct surveillance without probable cause. (“How the NSA’s Surveillance Procedures Threaten Americans’ Privacy.”) When people heard about this, they became concerned, and many began to question if the NSA would abuse this power.

Read More
546 Words | 3 Pages

Though it does not say that the states, nor do local government has the luxury of this right. So a federal agency such as the FBI, or the CIA will, and should have access to what us Americans have been doing via the internet.

Read More
1016 Words | 5 Pages

This completely takes away a person’s right to privacy. The government has access search anyone’s internet or library records. Taking away someone’s right to read what they please also takes away the freedom of writing about controversial topics since anyone who reads it is intimidated by the government (Jacobs and

Read More
119 Words | 1 Pages

To further support this, information that is collected is used to protect the Nation from "threats.” (2.1)Since this information is used to protect the Nation from “threats,” not to intrude on everyday citizen’s privacy, it is not an invasion of their right to privacy. Correspondingly, part of protecting citizen’s privacy is requiring a probable cause for

Read More
515 Words | 3 Pages

I believe that they are violating our rights by tracking us digitally. If their reason is to track terrorist threats, it’s a bit ironic to do that since we are taking oil from the Middle East, which is a country full of terrorism. The National Security Agency can access everything we do online and monitor text messages that we send. They collect every single thing we do digitally to track any terrorist threats.

Read More
747 Words | 3 Pages

Whether it is taking our freedom of speech away to some extent; to being able to go through our mail looking for possible harmful things. They are doing it to protect us; not to hurt

Read More
946 Words | 4 Pages

Many people might say that the privacy of modern day American citizens is being violated, that to similar to the world of 1984. The novel 1984 written by George Orwell is about a totalitarian government who oppresses its people and controls all aspects of their lives. The government is symbolized by Big Brother, people are monitored their entire day for flaws in their thinking towards Big Brother. I believe that privacy of American citizens is being violated and that people should not give up aspects of their personal privacy for greater good of society.

Read More
796 Words | 4 Pages

I think that the government should have very little jurisdiction to monitor people’s behavior on the internet. People should indefinitely be innocent until proven guilty. Getting even further into the matter, local government should have little to no say in what people put online. The local government is in charge of rent, safety and zoning. The local government should not be interested in what people choose to have online, unless the person is

Read More
734 Words | 3 Pages

Gun control in the US Guns in the United States is a very big problem, due to the fact that almost everyone in the United States can buy guns, which is a problem if the wrong people gets hold of a gun. Because everyone can buy guns, is it a matter of time before the wrong person gets a hold of a weapon. Also there’s as many guns as people in the United States. An example on that is school shootings, because to some who are not so mentally stable and therefore they go crazy with a gun at a school, witch is a problem Obama wants to solve quickly.

Read More

More about Government Invasion Of Privacy Essay

Related Topics

Open Document