ipl-logo

The Persuasive Essay Of Banning Books

500 Words2 Pages

Books contain profanity that children cannot and might not be able to handle. Profanity: blasphemous or obscene language. Banning books violates our 1st amendment, but some books contain graphic materials such as sexual content and various types of profanity that explains why books should be banned. Sexual content is one thing that should make the banning books topic way more in depth than it is. The use of sexual content in books might make children ask their parents or even teachers and friends that question which is what is sex? Or content used in books to make the book very sexual. If the child were to tell their parents about what they read it would may lead to grounding or more severe punishment. Kids should not learn the use of “Sex” …show more content…

Violence at school is banned kids might use them from some violence in books to use in reality and get in trouble or more. Fighting children could cause mighty the damage or the children might break something and go to the hospital and pay mass amounts of money for a book antagonizing him to use violence. Books could even cause children to hurt themselves if its say a dark book and could cause kids to change their appearance and mothers and fathers might take that a bad feeling because of just a book. Language used in books is a huge offence and very bad for younger kids and premature teenagers. No one would want a report home telling your parents that your son cursed from profanity in a book. Books with profanity cause children to use words that aren’t allowed in schools and many other places of the world. Cursing in books could change a kid’s whole appearance. In conclusion my opinion on book banning is that books should be banned based on their sexual content profanity cursing violence and more. Book banning is a necessity schools need to keep their children from cursing violence and many other things some books could contain that could cause a scene. Banning books stops unnecessary violence and vulgar language from out breaking in many areas of the

Show More
Related
717 Words | 3 Pages

There is at least 300 books banned a year for foul language, but don’t you think that an invasion of the authors freedom of press and an invasion of children 's first amendment as well? So I think that books should not be banned. I have three main idea the first on is that the books can be about history and they have some language back then that was fine but is not fine today. The second reason is that libraries should be able to hold all types of books but have an age restricted area. The last reason is that it will get rid of children’s first amendment, and the authors first right as well.

Read More
1002 Words | 5 Pages

In the 21st century, many books are challenged and banned for their content, some of these include The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, Animal Farm, and Fahrenheit 451. Many of the reasons given for banning are the same. The reasons include violence, language, symbols, and religion. This makes it very difficult for educational professionals; which books should be taught and which ones should be banned, when does protection become unnecessary censorship? Although Fahrenheit 451 shows some dark themes such as banning books, disregard for human life, and suicide, it should be included in the school curriculum because it shows the dystopian future that awaits the world if the events in the book become a reality.

Read More
652 Words | 3 Pages

Books are an essential way to gain knowledge whether they are controversial or not. Thousands of books have been banned from public libraries and schools due to being deemed ‘inappropriate’ by parents, administrators, or religious leaders. Whether Americans should ban books in public libraries and schools is an often debated topic. This censorship of books is dangerous, as it restricts the American people's’ ability to access information, leaving Americans ignorant. Historically, banning books is not a new practice.

Read More
2114 Words | 9 Pages

Every child deserves a proper education. Banned books are depriving students of a well rounded, culturally aware, literary education because of the culture that is discarded, the history that is being withheld, and the education that young people could get through these banned books. The point of history is to learn from it and learn from others mistakes, but how can we do that if we are not allowed to learn it. As teachers shouldn’t you be teaching us how to make judgment calls like understanding that Mark Twain was a racist, but a man of his time and that doesn’t change him being an amazing writer. We cannot learn things such as that if we cannot even read most of Mark Twain’s books.

Read More
232 Words | 1 Pages

Censorship in America is often debated. Erin Manning, texas-based writer explains that the American Library Association chooses to censor certain books because of “inappropriate content” and “second rate writing”(Manning 1). Parents attempt to protect their children from the outside world, by limiting their exposure to age appropriate language. When parents do this, their children’s knowledge of the outside world may be limited to what parents let their child view. Although some parents may feel that their child needs filtered information and entertainment, others believe that children and teens need to be shown uncensored content.

Read More
1750 Words | 7 Pages

Books can create portals to different life experiences and encourage reading. A few schools and libraries have challenged the educational value of some books, however, therefore leading them to eventually be prohibited in a particular place. Each reason may be different depending on the book and the location of the exclusions. Books are icons of literature and their value should outshine the occasionally offensive topic. Be that as it may, there are multiple reasons why books should be taught and included in a curriculum.

Read More
969 Words | 4 Pages

Although, not all books and novels belong in the school environment, the great, historic novels such as, Lord of the Flies by William Golding that are banned frequently should not be censored by school officials, board members, etc. Most of the novels that appear on ALA’s banned book list are historic novels with very deep, emotional themes behind them that students should learn to read and recognize. No one in today’s world is living in a fairy land, and historic novels with offensive content with good meanings should be taught to kids. Lord of the Flies has been banned by districts across the country mainly because of the excessive violence and lack of morality of the boys. Although there is a lot of offensive violence in the novel, the main outline of the story is that all men possess the capability of evil doing.

Read More
1119 Words | 5 Pages

Either way those are all to teach us something. When you ban and censor books inside those books are the fears you hold and that you don’t want to see. It is because of that reason why today there are so many social problems in our world. Not banning books wouldn’t solve all the social problems in the world but it would take us into the right direction. Keep people from the truth of banned books is the same as lying to them.

Read More
419 Words | 2 Pages

Author Kurt Vonnegut admits that “some of the characters speak coarsely, but that is because people speak coarsely in real life” (Vonnegut). Letting children read uncomfortable literature prepares them for what's really to come in the future. Vonnegut also mentions that allowing children to read painful pieces of literature helps ensure they are “better equipped to decide, and to survive” (Vonnegut). Getting rid of books only gives children a disadvantage in the big

Read More
666 Words | 3 Pages

Censorship Censorship in schools may not be the best choice for enriching the future minds of the United States of America. Children of the United States of America should have the right to learn about anything for it is there amended right. Taking knowledge away from them and censoring it should not be the answer to keeping our Children pure it should be what we teach our kids. We need to teach them right and wrong that is what will keep our child’s mind pure. Many books are being taken off shelves every day in student libraries because a couple people do not think that the book is suitable for children.

Read More
1366 Words | 6 Pages

Course language such as slurs or other insulting speech should be removed from the curriculum if those issues take place, in “Derby District Removes Novel form Class Materials and Middle School Library After Anonymous Complaint'' by KMUW it claims, “‘However, the frequency of (obscene) language in there made it a challenge as a class read,’ Putnam-Jackson said'' (Perez 3). The use of slurs and profanity in required reading can be insulting and offensive to people of color, different sexuality, people who struggle with a disability, and many more. If a student feels comfortable reading books that introduce profanity, slurs, and other insulting speech it is possible for that student to read those books on their own time, as it is agreed by the Derby Informer: “In any case, parents are free to provide controversial books to their children as they see fit” (“OPINION: There’s a middle ground on school book issues'' 3). Students have the liberties and freedom to discuss with their parents what is suitable for them to read and if a parent decides that a child is unable or allowed to read a select book then it is up to the child to read said book.

Read More
880 Words | 4 Pages

Books, Should We Ban Them Or Not: Banned books are books that have been taken out of public environments because of many different reasons. Books should not be banned simply because we have the rights to any books. Banned Books can teach important things about our history. Books that have been banned teach great morals/lesson even with the negative content. Banning Books infringes on people 's personal rights.

Read More
709 Words | 3 Pages

Also, some say that you should not be exposing bad behavior or language to students but in reality they hear and see these things everyday, and by banning a book, that is not protecting them. Writers have the freedom to write whatever they want and that is a part of the First Amendment, so why banned their book? “The First Amendment allows individuals to speak, publish, read and view what they wish, worship (or not worship) as they wish, associate with

Read More
609 Words | 3 Pages

A parent or the student should be the one who decided whether or not the book is appropriate. Also, when a child is sheltered from the world, a book with just a bit of adult material could help them understand what really happens. It could prepare them so when they do become older and get a job, the world doesn’t put them into complete shock. Taken from Common Reasons for Banning Books, “…it is important that the reader makes his/her judgments on the book.” To elaborate on this, another person shouldn’t tell a student what and what not to read.

Read More
1617 Words | 7 Pages

Moreover, it takes away a citizen 's first amendment and the right to free speech. Lastly, the series, Harry Potter has inappropriate topics that led it to being banned like magic, sorcery, and witchcraft. Some books are frequently banned in schools because they contain profanity/slurs, and explicit content; however, some people argue that these precisely same books are worth reading because they teach extremely crucial life lessons, and defends the First Amendment. There are multiple reasons why parents are banning books.

Read More

More about The Persuasive Essay Of Banning Books

Open Document