ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Animal Experimentation

1447 Words6 Pages

In the United States, more than 100 million animals are killed each year due to animal experimentation in laboratories, which is way too many. Everyday animals are burnt, sliced, poisoned with drugs, or executed during psychological testing. Animal experimentation is downright mean. Animals should not be put at risk or harmed to ensure the safety of humans.

Animal experimentation is conducted by universities, medical schools, pharmaceutical and biotechnological companies, and military defence establishments (Murnaghan). Animals are used for testing drugs, vaccines, other biologics, and medical devices to test the safety of the products (USDA). Animals are supposed to help scientists and researchers understand the human body without …show more content…

So much money is wasted each year for unreliable animal tests. The money the NIH spends every year could be going to other researches that are more cost effective and produce logical results that help us understand human body processes. Currently, there are many alternatives that are significantly cheaper and produce more accurate results. For example, a “sister chromatid exchange” animal test costs a total of $22,000. A sister chromatid exchange is the reciprocal exchange of two chromatid arms within a single chromosome (Sister). The purpose of this experiment is to find out a chemical’s ability to improve the exchange of DNA between two sister chromatids of a duplicating chromosome. Generally, young and healthy animals of any species are used for this examination. The results of this research is split right down the middle; almost half of the experiments done using this method do not work when tried on humans. This shows that these researchers have wasted money that they can never get back. On the other hand, vitro testing, which costs a total of $8,000, is used to diagnose diseases and monitor the clinical status of patients with blood, cell, or tissue samples from the patient (ProCon). “In vitro” means using the test tube method and models based on human cells and tissues (Society). Vitro testing was found to be more accurate than traditional animal tests, and it could potentially replace the need for animals in all medical science research. It would save thousands of dollars and millions of innocent animals’ lives. The amount of money spent for these researches could be going to more cost effective, reliable, and cruelty-free

Show More
Related
800 Words | 4 Pages

The Humane Society International stated, “Some animal tests take months or years to conduct and analyze (e.g., 4-5 years, in the case of rodent cancer studies), at a cost of hundreds of thousands—and sometimes millions—of dollars per substance examined (e.g., $2 to $4 million per two-species lifetime cancer study).” The New England Anti-Vivisection Society also stated, “The traditional testing of chemicals using animals can take up to five years per substance and cost millions of dollars, while non-animal alternatives can test hundreds of chemicals in a week for a fraction of the cost.” Scientists waste millions of dollars on animal studies that are not relevant to humans. There are alternative, cheaper methods that can benefit human research more than animal testing can and further the advancement of science and medicine in months instead of years. By using animals for research, scientists are putting America’s money and animals at

Read More
1132 Words | 5 Pages

Scientist have been overstepping boundaries in many parts of the scientific world, one of these being animal testing. Animal testing is when scientist test on animals and inject them or mutate their genes for a human gain, typically with no gain for the animal. The National Library of Medicine posted an article on the flaws and harms of animal experimentation, these flaws can be put in these, “...three major conditions undermine this confidence and explain why animal experimentation, regardless of the disease category studied, fails to reliably inform human health: (1) the effects of the laboratory environment and other variables on study outcomes, (2) disparities between animal models of disease and human diseases, and (3) species differences in physiology and genetics.” The first condition being the influence of laboratory procedures and environments on experimental results. The conditions in these experiments show that, “animals in laboratories are involuntarily placed in artificial environments, usually in windowless rooms, for the duration of their lives.

Read More
796 Words | 4 Pages

This research is unfair and animals in this test don’t understand anything that is going to happen to them. Furthermore, animals “suffer painful procedures and isolations”(Source A) that really impacts the way scientists are saving human lives. However if we don’t stop animal testing, we could save lives but we won’t be helping the innocent animals the could be endangered and-and almost instinct. There are also alternatives that scientist could use to see if the product they have created could impact human lives. I think that if scientist test one cell organisms they could find the result of the experiment and see what could impact the entire body of a human or an

Read More
643 Words | 3 Pages

Animal Testing has been a very controversial topic for decades. Throughout history, animal testing has played a major role in leading to many new medicines and discoveries. Most of the world participates in these experiments, with the aims of achieving the most modern technologies. Animal testing needs to be continued to advance our science and medicines, and to continue to save millions of lives.

Read More
1585 Words | 7 Pages

"The term 'animal testing' refers to procedures performed on living animals for purposes of research into basic biology and disease. Asserting the effectiveness of new medicinal products, and testing the human health and/or environmental safety of consumer and industry products such as cosmetics, household cleaners, food additives, pharmaceuticals and industrial/Argo-chemicals (“About Animal Testing”)”. 3. Till this day, animal testing is considered justified because scientists believe any type of animal is obligated to sacrifice itself in order to make new products safer for human use and consumption (“Save the Animals”).

Read More
844 Words | 4 Pages

Other ways are less expensive and they can use the money on something else important that would help everyone. We would get a lot more out of the money we had if we didn't test on animals but their tissue and get the same results but in a easier and safer method that saves government research dollars that we could use on something just as important. All in all, we dont need to be wasting money when there are other options that are less

Read More
992 Words | 4 Pages

Animal testing is not working and it is useless. The couple of many alternatives against animal testing consist of Chips relating to human cells and the Human Skin Replica. The first solution is the organs-on-chips method. This is when chips have human matter on them, they are containing human cells. This can show scientist how organs grow and form for humans.

Read More
486 Words | 2 Pages

Animal experimentation is used by most researchers in the United States, and products need to pass numerous tests on animals before they are approved by the FDA. This is why many animals are used in an experiment; Almost 12,000 animals are used in almost 50 tests for a single pesticide. Is this really necessary? Although testing on animals can protects humans from dangerous products, animal experimentation is not necessary because too many animals die, many tests animals pass fail on humans, and thousands of animals are being tortured. First, too many animals end up dying from being experimented on.

Read More
1681 Words | 7 Pages

With animal testing, it has hindered the focus of bettering the alternatives that are already out there, but it cannot rise to the surface of normality since animal testing is all that people want to believe is available. Is the amount of money, false results, and pain that an animal endures during testing worth it? When will we stop trying to re-create the past and try to move on to the newer and better alternatives that are available. We must try to use these newer medical advances, alternative research choices and find other resources to use—they are out there, we just have not given it our full attention. In order to move forward, we must stop being okay with having mediocre results that way we can use our resources and money to create something beneficial, something that can stay around for a

Read More
343 Words | 2 Pages

In the United States today, about 26 million animals are used each year for scientific and commercial testing. The topic of animal rights has been a big debate ever since medical researchers and scientists began using animals and their experiments. The main debate is whether or not it is ethical for animals be used for medical research and the rights animals have. The issue is, animals are used research for human benefit and many argue this is inhumane and cruel. In general, the proponents of using animals for medical research argue that it is necessary for improving and saving humans’ lives but are not opposed to finding an alternative that is less controversial.

Read More
1139 Words | 5 Pages

Animals in Research and Testing According to PETA, the animals who are in research and testing “shake and cower in fear whenever someone walks past their cages and their blood pressure spikes drastically. After enduring lives of pain, loneliness and terror, almost all of them will be killed,” (“Animal Testing 101”). Animal-testing is the use of non-human animals in research and development projects, especially for purposes of determining the safety of substances, such as foods, beauty products, and/or drugs. Although animal research plays a crucial role in experiments focused on disease treatments and preventions, it is cruel, inhumane, and should be stopped. This is an act that should be banned and prohibited in all states and countries

Read More
1268 Words | 6 Pages

… The problem is that [animal testing] hasn’t worked, and it’s time we stopped dancing around the problem. … We need to refocus and adapt new methodologies for use in humans to understand disease biology in humans. There are multiple others options besides having to test on animals. There are in vitro, research with human volunteers, and human patient simulators.

Read More
1866 Words | 8 Pages

Henceforth, as animal testing increased, so did the controversy surrounding it (“Animal testing,” n.d.). Moreover, with the help of animal testing, various treatments and medicines are developed for unconventional diseases. Although animal testing may seem ruthless, animals are used for experimental research that contributes to science if there are no other possible substitutes. Animal testing is a debatable topic that still continues to be one until this time. Animal experimentation should persist because it saves human’s life from diseases, ensures cosmetics’ safety, and improves medical

Read More
1172 Words | 5 Pages

Scientists have developed computer models, and have grown human cells into three dimensional structures used in the innovative ‘organ-on-chips.’ Human tissue has been donated form biopsies, cosmetic surgery and transplants to be used instead of animals (Alternatives to animal testing, crueltyfreeinternational.org) According to nsi.org, Chromosome aberration costs $30,000 to do an animal, but only $20,00 to do an in vitro test (a test in a glass dish using human cells); sister chromatid exchange is $14,000 cheaper to do an in vitro test than an animal test; a DNA synthesis done outside of a living organism would save the tester $21,000 on the $32,000 cost to complete this test on animals (Cost of Animal and Non-Animal Testing). It is not logical to waste that sum of money on a more harmful way of testing medicine and cosmetics, Laboratories would save $25,000 on just those three tests. Researchers might argue that, “without animal research, millions of dogs…would be dead from more than 200 diseases” (animal Research and Its Benefits to Both Humans and Animals).

Read More
431 Words | 2 Pages

Animal Testing is Inhumane. Multiple species are dying by normal nature happenings, such as being eaten or something like that. However, that 's just the life cycle. But even with this ongoing cycle, the deaths that happen in it don 't get anywhere close to the amount of animals killed by us humans. Each year, 100 million animals, including mice, rats, dogs, frogs, cats, and more, are all killed for scientific usage.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Animal Experimentation

Related Topics

Open Document