ipl-logo

Argumentative Essay On Animal Testing

1172 Words5 Pages

Gavage tubes, or tubes used to pump food or medicine, are inserted into primates’ mouths and noses even through the U.S Food and Drug Administration reported that animal tests have a 92% failure rate in predicting the efficiency and/or safety of pharmaceuticals. This means 2% of rats, mice, and primates that go through years of expensive and painful testing are suffering for no one. According to Rachel Hajar, M. D., Animals have been used repeatedly throughout the history of biomedical research. Early Greek physician-scientists, such as Aristotle, (384 – 322 BC) and Erasistratus, (304 – 258 BC), performed experiments on living animals (Animal Testing and Medicine). Animal testing is a practice used throughout the world (and is required in …show more content…

Scientists have developed computer models, and have grown human cells into three dimensional structures used in the innovative ‘organ-on-chips.’ Human tissue has been donated form biopsies, cosmetic surgery and transplants to be used instead of animals (Alternatives to animal testing, crueltyfreeinternational.org) According to nsi.org, Chromosome aberration costs $30,000 to do an animal, but only $20,00 to do an in vitro test (a test in a glass dish using human cells); sister chromatid exchange is $14,000 cheaper to do an in vitro test than an animal test; a DNA synthesis done outside of a living organism would save the tester $21,000 on the $32,000 cost to complete this test on animals (Cost of Animal and Non-Animal Testing). It is not logical to waste that sum of money on a more harmful way of testing medicine and cosmetics, Laboratories would save $25,000 on just those three tests. Researchers might argue that, “without animal research, millions of dogs…would be dead from more than 200 diseases” (animal Research and Its Benefits to Both Humans and Animals). The money saved from alternative testing methods, can be used towards research to help find cures to these diseases using alternative methods. Also, the money can be used to make scientific advances in discovering new ways to test products that don’t involve animals. In short, although …show more content…

Using donated human cells rather than stolen animals to test human cosmetics and medicine will produce more accurate test results.
“A recent study which compared the activity of human genes important for sepsis, trauma and burns with the equivalent mouse genes revealed that human and mice use very different sets of genes to cope with these insults”( failure of the Animal Model, NSA.org)
The mouse and human genome are desperate; they won’t produce the same results. The different cells used to heal will produce a false result that won’t compare to what would happen in the human body. This renders the mouse genome useless for testing human reactions. Scientist might opine that animals were a beneficial part in the creating vaccinations to measles, tetanus, diphtheria, mumps, and small pox. (Animal research and its Benefits to both Humans and Animals, news-medical.com) However, in 2015,
“Scientist in the U.S. use approximately 11-25 million animals in research of which only less than 1 million are not rats, mice, birds or fish” (USDA Annual reports on Animal Usage in

Show More
Related
800 Words | 4 Pages

The Humane Society International stated, “Some animal tests take months or years to conduct and analyze (e.g., 4-5 years, in the case of rodent cancer studies), at a cost of hundreds of thousands—and sometimes millions—of dollars per substance examined (e.g., $2 to $4 million per two-species lifetime cancer study).” The New England Anti-Vivisection Society also stated, “The traditional testing of chemicals using animals can take up to five years per substance and cost millions of dollars, while non-animal alternatives can test hundreds of chemicals in a week for a fraction of the cost.” Scientists waste millions of dollars on animal studies that are not relevant to humans. There are alternative, cheaper methods that can benefit human research more than animal testing can and further the advancement of science and medicine in months instead of years. By using animals for research, scientists are putting America’s money and animals at

Read More
796 Words | 4 Pages

Every year several million animals die due to animal testing in for medical, psychological, and products research. Moreover, animal testing is something that shouldn’t be continued and for it is completely wrong and cruel. Animal testing started in the late 300’s BC. Aristotle and Erasistratus performed many experiments that involved living animals. Similarly, Galen, a greek physician, conducted animals research to explore the field of anatomy, physiology, and pharmacology.

Read More
625 Words | 3 Pages

Animal testing costs a large amount of money, as the animals must be fed, housed and treated with various kinds of drugs. Based on the National Institutes of Health (NIH)’s 2014 budget in the United States, more than $12 billion was spent to support animal experiments. Five hundred thousand and 1.7 million dollar were used to experiment on dogs and monkeys, respectively. However, non-animal testing is generally more reliable, less costly and more humane than animal-based tests. Technology and innovation have taken medical research way pass the point where animal testing is the only alternative.

Read More
488 Words | 2 Pages

Those who supervise and conduct the experiments may have faster results with more animals, but it is not necessarily cost effective. Animal testing is by-far more expensive than alternative methods scientists and labs could be using to reach their medical goals. The Humane Society International compared many methods of animal testing research with alternative non-animal ideas and experiments. It is stated, “An ‘unscheduled DNA synthesis’ animal test costs $32,000, while the in vitro alternative costs $11,000,” ("Animal Testing -

Read More
882 Words | 4 Pages

Technology is advancing, and the need for animal testing has vanished. There are several alternate methods that are much more effective than using rats or monkeys, not to mention cheaper. Studying cell structures in a petri-dish, micro-dosing, artificial human skin, and computer models have all done away with the need for animal testing. These methods have proved to be more successful, due to the fact that actual human cells are used rather than that of a difference species. These methods ensure safety for all animals, find cures and treatments, and save our country loads of

Read More
536 Words | 3 Pages

Millions of animals die every year for animal testing. Animals and humans are two different species, there are products that are very harmful for animals that are good for humans and vis versa. There are alternatives to animal testing yet we still are hurting animals every day for it. There is human based micro dosing, human- patent simulations, and sophistical computer modeling that are very accurate alternatives from animal testing that are cheaper and

Read More
1173 Words | 5 Pages

Animal Experimentation Experimentation upon animals has been around ever since mankind began to dive into their curiosity about the functions of the body. The Greeks were one of the first to detail the cardiopulmonary system, through the use of dissecting and observing animals, and Ibn Zuhr, an Arab scientist during the 10th century, tested and founded specific surgical procedures from the use of performing them first on animals before proceeding to do them on humans (Scutti 1). Centuries after the early Greeks and Arabs, the 20th century saw a major increase of the use of animals. As the popularity and demand of over-the-counter pharmaceutical drugs, many drugs were in need to be tested on animals before being distributed to stores worldwide,

Read More
437 Words | 2 Pages

Many would argue that animal testing is important, and that it is better to do tests on animals than to people. While it may be true that people are more important, there are other alternatives. Some alternatives include growing human cells in labs, which can be done with just about any cell, human tissue donations, computer models, and volunteer microdosing, which is examining how a miniscule dose affects the body. These alternatives are much safer, much more reliable, and not to mention, much more

Read More
1387 Words | 6 Pages

Many of the opinions for medical experimentations are supportive due to the benefit it can give us as a human race to end diseases and illnesses that are fatal. But as for the opinions on commercial product experimentation, such as make-up and beauty products, are often against the idea due to the fact that the products are for a want and not a need, and are putting animal lives at risk for no real benefit. Institutions, such as the California Biomedical Research Association, explain why animals are necessary in biomedical research. The DNA codes of many of the animals we use match so directly that

Read More
557 Words | 3 Pages

Animal testing has improved the lives of millions of people over its years of operation but should not be thought of as a permanent solution. The act of physical animal testing is a dated way to improve human welfare. Modern day technology can be used to replicate the genetic makeup of humans and animals by eliminating harm and death completely. The continued developments in technology have the potential to replace immoral animal testing with virtual lab experiments.

Read More
1111 Words | 5 Pages

Those are includes computer simulators and imaging techniques, clinical research in vitro research that is in a test tube and others (Embar, W 2008). Many new technologies already available that can predict subtle risk that animal tests cannot and could be saving lives. Also it is a better way to promote human and animal health and safety than the cruel, outdated, and ineffective use of animals in research and testing (Animals in Research, 2014). To use the most reliably proved methods available, Governments should replace mandatory animal testing laws with an obligation. Government health services would save billions, patients would benefit, animals would be spared and free and pharmaceutical companies could develop safer medicines (Using animals to test drugs is out dated and unreliable, 2014).

Read More
590 Words | 3 Pages

Some people say that animal testing should be used for more times because people desire to have new medicines. However, not only it would take many years, but also cost too much money. Although it seems that the materials and facilities for animal experimentation are not expensive, research shows that the cost of an animal experiment is extremely high. McDaniel said, “The scientific community has wasted $20 million taxpayer dollars exposing animals to drugs for a variety of arbitrary and pointless tests (2010, “The High Cost”). From the data, we can see that the animal test is failed, although the community put a great amount of money on it.

Read More
881 Words | 4 Pages

According to the Humane International Society, “The term ‘animal testing’ refers to procedures performed on living animals for purposes of research into basic biology and diseases, assessing the effectiveness of new medical products, and testing human health and/or environmental safety of consumer and industry products such as cosmetics, household cleaners, food additives, pharmaceuticals and industrial/agro-chemicals.” (“About Animal Testing”). Animals are forced to live in harsh conditions, while undergoing painful procedures. However, it is not new, as animal testing dates back all the way to 384 BC when Aristotle was using them for experiments. As stated by the Humane Society International, the most common experimental test subjects are:

Read More
859 Words | 4 Pages

It is true that animal testing requires a lot of investment. Not only that money is spent on advanced technologies, it is also spent to pay for scientists’ expertise on this particular field. In order for the scientists to do their research, they need suitable equipment and substances. Every year, the National institutes of Health finances between $12 billion to $14.5 billion on animal testing as indicated in a study done by the government (Bastach, 2013). Besides, scientists need to consider the fact that animals need to be sheltered, fed and cared for to keep them alive.

Read More
1115 Words | 5 Pages

In a research it is shown that such animal tests are more expensive than alternative methods and are waste of dollars. For example: “An unscheduled DNA synthesis” test cost $32,000 while the alternative costs around, $11,000. A “rat phototoxity test” costs around $11,500 whereas a non-animal one costs only $1,300. (Kath (Placeholder2)leen Conlee,2013). Since the majority of animals are killed during or after the testing, the lives of animals are sacrificed for poor research that ends up to be flawed with a wastage of

Read More

More about Argumentative Essay On Animal Testing

Related Topics

Open Document