The Pros and Cons of Banning Books There are two sides to the book banning: those for it and those against it. These sources will show why books get banned. First, there is the author Macey France she makes her point of saying why books should be banned by showing the bad parts of banned books. The next author, Jenni White has a similar approach and even uses a quote from France. This next author, Emma Greguska writes her point about how we should not ban books, saying these books prepare the students for the future and teaches them how to deal with real-life problems in a safe space.
In my attempt to answer my research question, “Why are books banned?” , I have used three main sources to conduct my research on this topic, two online articles, and one book. From my two online articles, “10 Reasons for Banning Books, and 5 Much Better Reasons Not To” and “Banned Books: Reasons for Banning Books”, I have learned that books are most commonly banned because of religious views, political views, sexual dialog, racial themes, violence, and profanity. In the article “10 Reasons for Banning Books, and 5 Much Better Reasons Not To” Jamie Leigh writes: “Notice that not a single one of them referred to “statistics” or “research”. This highlights the fact that people are merely banning these books because they are offended by the content
Books can show kids the struggles of real people and can teach them empathy and sympathy for these people. When you take away these books children have a narrow view on life and won’t be able to look through other people’s perspectives. In the article, ‘The Negative Effects of Book Banning in the Classroom’, the author, Chiesa says, “When individuals restrict their children from reading certain books, they can't enforce those beliefs onto other children and families. Banning books has the potential to create gaps in knowledge for young learners.” Children will learn less if they are restricted from reading certain books and these restrictions can also affect children in the same classroom.
Would you want anyone to ban books so you couldn’t further your education? School Board members should not ban certain books because students can get more of a challenge from certain books, you also can get many life lessons from a more mature book, and students also get more of a choice which means more books to read. One reason I believe school board members should not ban books is because it gives students more of a challenge. For example, teachers like to challenge kids to read above their grade level and reading more mature books will get them there. However, how will they get assigned harder or more challenging books if those kinds of books are banned from the school library.
Books can create portals to different life experiences and encourage reading. A few schools and libraries have challenged the educational value of some books, however, therefore leading them to eventually be prohibited in a particular place. Each reason may be different depending on the book and the location of the exclusions. Books are icons of literature and their value should outshine the occasionally offensive topic. Be that as it may, there are multiple reasons why books should be taught and included in a curriculum.
Weapons and Tactics: World War I and World War II Comparing the weapons and tactics of World War I and World War II is a very interesting topic. There were a lot of advancements in weapon technology and tactics after the First World War. In World War I, the British commonly used the rifle.
“Let readers be leaders” is the motto of Martha Hickinson, a school librarian who after hearing completely compelling and false statements about books at a school board meeting rallied and gathered around four hundred other people against the ban to speak out. There were speeches by adults and even students, and the fight dragged on where Hickinson received an immense amount of hate but in the end, the book was restored. This is a demonstration of how one person can change a lot. Overall, book banning is an ongoing issue happening right now. It is not only happening in schools, but at a national level.
Books should not be banned from schools and libraries, everyone should be allowed to be informed on what’s happening in the world and learn about diversity, despite a book having unpopular views. Opponents claim that all books should be monitored and banned if they give off unpopular opinion or can possibly hurt the public. 1.) One
“American citizens who care about the improvement of education are urged to join students, teachers, librarians, administrators, boards of education, and professional and scholarly organizations in support of the students’ right to read” (The Students Right to Read). Citizens should be allowed to stand up if they believe books should not be banned. It is important that writers should be able to have their books out to the public without getting banned. “Challengers often employ a definition that maintains that banning materials is the only true form of censorship,”(Knox 740). Censorship of books is common and a real problem.
First, this text states, “Children should not be exposed to sex, violence, drug use, or other inappropriate topics” (Procon.org). To explain, parents are banning books from schools because they do not want their children to be exposed to these inappropriate topics. Moreover, banning these inappropriate topic books would be a great deal for parents and their children. Furthermore, the same text states that “Keeping books with an inappropriate content out of libraries protects kids, but does not stop people from
1- Sometimes government doesn't want people to know what is going on in the world, or what happened in the past. Some of the government wants people to follow their agenda and make people blind and not seeing the truth. In my opinion, in some cases, bane some books are good. For example, before we had a government that is banned many books. The reason why I agree with the previous government for this point, it was for people benefit and to protect them.
Banned Books Should school administrators be able to ban books? Recently schools have been trying to ban books in schools like the “Adventures of Huckleberry Finn” and “To Kill a Mockingbird” both these books were written more than 50 years ago. But what I think people should understand is these books were written in 1885 and 1960 so the events in the books were recent in US history. The reason schools want to ban the book is because it has a few bad words in the books.
The banning books: Praised or Disapproved. Many books have been banned all around the world despite that people still think that books should not be banned because of the content inside even if the book has a good message. Books such as Harry Potter have been banned for it use of magic and witchcraft. But still others think that the lesson is more important. Banning books have pros and cons and can be seen either way.
If we are to ban book forever it would create a bad effect on the kids and maybe even destroy morals of life lessons for students going through life. Many people choose to do what they think is best for the safety of their kids even though sometimes it harms them in more way than helps them. When you keep parts of a books in, kids gain knowledge of what they should not do and what they can do or act. Books are some people’s way to escape reality for just a moment in their daily lives. Books shouldn’t be banned this would be taking away rights of citizens through the First Amendment.
There are pros and cons about if books should or should not be banned. They are being banned in schools libraries What do you think? Should books be banned? Some people think books should not be banned because some books are not that bad and some of the book that are being banned help people.
