ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Genetically Modified Foods

646 Words3 Pages

Where is your thesis statement? Would someone go into the store and purchase something that they know isn’t good for them? Or something that will trigger a reaction that threatens their own health or wellbeing? Of course not; that sounds like something an incompetent person would do; in other words it isn’t very smart...the only probable reasoning or excuse for such an action would be that the buyer just wasn’t aware of what was in that product. How could something like this happen? It all starts with the absence of a label saying “produced with GMOs” or “Not made with any hormones” Labels like this would make things way more efficient during purchases.The only concern is that some companies and the government wish not to participate in the labeling …show more content…

All foods raised or processed with gmos should be labeled. Genetic engineering is something that is beginning to take a toll in the world of agriculture and needs to be identified.“The genetic engineering of plants and animals is booming as one of the greatest & most intractable environmental challenges of the 21st century.” ( centerforfoodsafety.org) As of 2017, up to 75% of processed foods are on supermarket shelves ready to be consumed in an american citizen's diet. November 2015, the FDA approved the first genetically engineered salmon to be fit and available for consumption by humans;highlighting the pavement for other gmo’s to squeeze into the communities daily diet.Out of that percentage; how many genetically modified foods are actually labeled on the product to make consumers aware of the purchase being made? Not that many, for over 4 years now there has been a huge national epidemic debate on “Should GMOs be labeled on the market or continue to allow the constituents inside remain confidential?” The answer is

Show More
Related
184 Words | 1 Pages

Ever wonder what 's getting put into the food that you are eating everyday without thinking about the harm that you might be doing direct toward yourself just by consuming food that is supposed to be satisfying for you ? Dan charles in the article ‘ congress just passed GMO labelling bill, nobody 's super happy about it’. States that food companies will include to reveal weather products contain GMO ingredients although they won 't possess via print it on the package label. Dan uses epiploce and dinumeration to support his claim. The author 's purpose is to aware people advanced laws that are taking action in order to show how people feel about it the author addresses GMO foods won 't include to revelled in a formal tone.

Read More
1447 Words | 6 Pages

They fought not to label genetically modified foods; and now 70% of processed food in the supermarket has some genetically modified ingredient.” (Food Inc.). Eric Schlosser is depicting a strong, heavy fight against food labeling in the food production industry. He states that companies fight, “tooth and nail,” against food labeling. Companies don’t want the consumers to know what they are ingesting, and they are going to the greatest of extents to achieve that goal.

Read More
1034 Words | 5 Pages

Disobedience can be defined as failure or refusal to obey rules or someone in authority. Disobedience can also be defined as causing a disarray within society and causing a shift in social normals to more perfectly suit the conditions of a community at a given time, in the sense that it promotes the questions of poor social norms, and the change in our mortal standards and by the progressive though of one’s own mind. Oscar Wilde argues that it can allow society to progress and to allow science about different or certain topics to be broken or misplaced, and the way that it counter our social norms instead of disobedience leading to be a negative human and societal trait in our very way of life. He also argues about how disobedience can lead

Read More
1121 Words | 5 Pages

The Non-GMO talk passionately about the effects GMOs have on human bodies and the environment. They do have valid statements such as, “In the absence of credible independent long-term feeding studies, the safety of GMOs is unknown” (Non-GMO Project). This is completely true. There have been no long-term studies on what GMOs can do to humans which can be a caution people can take when deciding of they want to consume products that have been genetically modified. However, the other of this argument, the people against GMOs, have created such a panic within the rest of the country that many decide to get GMO free products just in case there are negative effects.

Read More
799 Words | 4 Pages

“Today in the United States, by the simple acts of feeding ourselves, we are unwittingly participating in the largest experiment ever conducted on human beings.” Jeremy Seifert certainly knows how to get viewers’ attention, as exemplified by the film blurb describing his 2013 documentary, GMO OMG. The frightening depiction of the food industry is one of many efforts to expose consumers of the twenty-first century to the powerful organizations that profit from national ignorance and lack of critical inquiry and involvement. Seifert effectively harnesses the elements of rhetoric throughout his phenomenal argument against remaining complacent about the food industry’s act of withholding of information about genetically modified organisms from

Read More
1053 Words | 5 Pages

Monsanto and other companies such as those that own Larabar, Silk and Kashi do not want consumers to know the truth about GMOs in the foods they have purchased. They are also spending huge sums of money to try to defeat Proposition 37. “The Proposition dictates that labeling is required on raw and processed food if it has been made using Genetically Modified material. ”(Rodale)(No on Proposition 37)

Read More
1826 Words | 8 Pages

Genetic modification is the alteration of an organism's genes to acquire desired characteristics (Kracht para 1). Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are in over 70% of products produced in the United States, especially since most contain traces of corn, soybean, rice or canola, which are some of the popularly grown genetically modified crops. (Steinhauer and Strom para 20). Currently, companies are not required to label GMO-containing products, however, some people are pushing to make it a requirement (para 3). Products containing GMOs should not be labeled because products manufactured in the United States have been modified in one way or another, therefore, the FDA should not require GMO labeling.

Read More
1096 Words | 5 Pages

GMOs increase the use of dangerous chemicals, GMOs are not labeled, and we do not need GMOs to feed everyone. It is time that we stop consuming and producing these harmful crops. Imagine being an organic food, then all of a sudden an evil food scientist injects a needle into you, filled with genes of other organisms. How would you feel? Think about it, why would we trust something that has been around for only 30 years and has not been proven safe when we can trust something that has been around for 1000s of years and has been proven

Read More
573 Words | 3 Pages

Everyday people are eating genetically modified organisms and don’t even realize it! There are many people that have absolutely no knowledge of what GMO’s are. The United States needs to pass a federal law requiring the labeling of all genetically modified foods in the country. There are over 60 countries around the world that require the labeling of GMO’s, so why isn’t America doing the same? As consumers, we have the right to know what we’re eating and feeding our families.

Read More
802 Words | 4 Pages

A label is not that important in the eyes of a farmer and manufacturer, simply because of the amount of customers they would get challenging the ‘naturalness’ of their products. But is there really any point in slapping a simple label on GM food to gratify a segment of the population involved. At the end of the day, manufacturers are deciding whether they will even continue to develop an enormously beneficial technology or avoid it based on unsubstantiated

Read More
488 Words | 2 Pages

This incredibly similar to the situation we had a few years back with the organic foods. Without the term being officially defined and a standard set for what would quality as this kind of food, companies are free to do whatever they want and charge big bucks for something that might be no different from anything else you eat. That's not right and the American people deserve better. When this happened with organic foods, the FDA stepped it, created a process to verify the claim, and awarded honest companies with an FDA certified organic label. All I want is to see the same thing with GMO-related products.

Read More
811 Words | 4 Pages

If labeling all the times is too much then we could label products similar to an organic or GMO Free

Read More
948 Words | 4 Pages

Why are genetically modified products harmful? Though genetically modifying crops may increase crop output, there are several health risks that outweigh this positive point. There is currently no requirement by the FDA for GMOs to be labeled. This is a negative, because if you do not want to purchase GMOs, you cannot know for sure what you are purchasing. You must look for foods with a seal stating the food is “Non-GMO Project Verified,” otherwise you may consume genetically modified foods.

Read More
966 Words | 4 Pages

Genetically modified foods have been receiving a lot of unjustified hate from the media recently. This is unjustified because GM foods are superior for three main reasons; They produce far more food than un-altered crops, the negative environmental impact is decreased, and the overall quality of GM foods is increased. This should be far more than enough to debunk the myths of GM foods being bad. The consumer, being anyone from an industrial farmer to a small family, can rest assured buying, eating or growing

Read More
3775 Words | 16 Pages

Had he gone further into the report he would have found that organic fruits and vegetables are significantly closer in price to conventionally grown ones. We are all paying extra for the fallout from GMOs. This case indeed shows that food labeling issues are not only vital and extremely important today, but also that there is very hard to come to a solution. It would be very easy to label everything, require companies to let consumers know every single ingredient and in turn, hope to increase global health levels. However, it seems that opposing side has very strong arguments and companies are reluctant to sacrifice their profits in order to improve consumers health, which, very interestingly, is sometimes argued would not be achieved by doing so

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Genetically Modified Foods

Related Topics

Open Document