ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Gun Control

442 Words2 Pages

Nowadays, there are a lot of the extensively arguments, especially in the United states, whether the policies should carry guns. Recently, this argument is widely raised due to news of the police shooting the innocent people extremely effects the negative opinion to them. Someone opines that if the policies are allowed to carry guns, they will have a high tendency to make more crimes. On the other hand, the police having a gun will decrease crimes. However, in my opinion, the polices should have or carry guns while they are on duty with the limitation of the power of using guns
As I mentioned above, the guns is still extremely needed for the police on their duty. Without the guns, if there are crimes or unremindable situations occurring, the police could not give the security to innocent people including themself from those situations on time. The guns will be used as a weapon for the polices to protect themselves and people while they are attacked by the attacker on the duty. Therefore, the polices with guns is still substantially requested for the people’s security in case of the happening of the situations as mentioned above.
In my country, Thailand, the death …show more content…

These situations reflect to a lack of inspection and carefulness before committing any actions of the polices. Therefore, in term of my view, there should be an imposition of the laws or regulations to limit the police’s power in using guns. There must be a highest punishment for the impropriate and wrong committing of polices in using guns. This step will take effective on the police’s action, they will increase more awareness on their action in every time whether it is reasonable or actual need to use guns. This way may reduce the number of crimes occurring from the police’s action with the

Show More
Related
687 Words | 3 Pages

(22) This question forced an answer on everyone even those who support gun control due to the demanding need of self-protection against violent crime. While the midst

Read More
1544 Words | 7 Pages

If the population understands that there is no longer a risk of dying while non-lethal weapons are in play, felons may be braver to commit a crime or threaten bystanders without the fear of dying. Secondly, if an officer is stuck using non-lethal weapons, and a situation calls for lethal force, the officer may be restrained by the reduced force of his or her weapon. Subsequently, knowing that their weapons are non lethal, some “corrupted” officers abusing their power may take advantage of their weapon’s reduced force to take advantage of citizens through police

Read More
762 Words | 4 Pages

Having guns will increase crime rate and violence. Many bad things can go wrong with carrying a gun on

Read More
1129 Words | 5 Pages

This example shows that gun control laws need to be strengthened, and that does not necessarily mean guns need to be taken away. One last argument that people have is that it would reduce the deaths of police officers. Police personnel are often targeted by criminals because they enforce the laws, giving criminals guns to fuel their anger can put police and civilians at risk, reducing the number of powerful firearms could reduce the loss of lives, especially police lives ("Gun Control Laws"). This shows that strengthening gun laws could save the lives of police and civilians. Strengthening gun laws could prove to be very useful and save countless lives, but there are two sides to this

Read More
1336 Words | 6 Pages

My personal belief on guns is that they are there to protect us as a society. Whether it be a police officer or a soldier or even your mom, guns can be used for good. I was brought up around guns and I learned how to safely handle them, but others do not have the experience I do and therefore misuse their weapon. We are protected under the second amendment right –the right to bear arms for all citizens—(US constitution) but all citizens includes criminals and mentally insane. Most crimes involving guns, the person is to later be found out to be insane, such as the movie theater killer, he obviously wasn’t in any frame of mind to own a gun.

Read More
1151 Words | 5 Pages

Hence, in order to stop gun smuggling, the government should set up a better strategies of enforcement in the armed forces to combat illegal possession and carrying of firearms. This application have been applied in America and Colombia cities. They enforce gun detection patrols in high-crime areas, enhanced surveillance of probationers and parolees, weapon reporting hotlines, consent searches, and other similar tactics. As a result, it produce a positive outcome as gun carrying have reduce firearm homicides from 10% to 15% in Colombian studies while American studies

Read More
800 Words | 4 Pages

Currently gun violence and crime is rare throughout the UK. Giving all police firearms may increase the perceived need for civilians to have access to the guns. This could increase the amount of gun violence and violent crime committed in the UK. This would cause extra pressure on police resources and arguably increase the risk of serious incident. There is evidence to support that providing Police Firearms could increase ‘Gang mentality’ in certain areas of UK.

Read More
659 Words | 3 Pages

“Are police officers going too far?” is the question that has recently sparked a lot of controversies over the issue whether police should be disarmed. In the belief that too many innocent were killed by armed police, most philosophers, including Dr. Luke Maring, have argued that police forces should not be issued firearms under all circumstances. In the article “Police Violence: A Right-Based Argument for Gun Control,” Dr. Maring states three premises in which first, citizens have a right against wrongful death, injury, and intimidation; second, the police violate that right because they use firearms and therefore third, we should disarm the police. This leads to a conclusion that if the police ought to be disarmed, then citizens should be disarmed as well. In this

Read More
713 Words | 3 Pages

Some people might say that we need a gun to protect ourselves in the United States, but there are actually various ways to protect ourselves instead of using a gun according to the article, “How Americans Protect Themselves from Crime.” Transition to Conclusion: before the government legislates about the gun control law, we need to be the spearhead that is awake to this problem deeply and carefully. Restate Thesis: I am convinced that the entire civilian should not own guns to prevent the gun violence, and only government officers must be able to own guns. Review Main Points: we realize that erroneous gun possession contributes to horrible gun accidents.

Read More
816 Words | 4 Pages

Gun control problems Nowadays, we can hear the crimes related to guns from time to time, and each of them is scarified and influential. For example, the accident happened in Sandy Hook Elementary School leads to 20 deaths for primacy school students and 6 deaths for staffs. It is hard to imagine what degree of sadness in their family may suffer. In this way, many people think the government should have stronger gun control regulations.

Read More
1004 Words | 5 Pages

These deaths have sparked protests, riots, and distrust towards law enforcement. The police should not carry guns or guns with deadly ammunition while they are on daily patrol because shootings by police are increasing, the tension between police and citizens is causing feelings of unrest across the nation, and not carrying guns has helped other nations. The first reason police should not carry guns is because the

Read More
691 Words | 3 Pages

When we examine how guns are used in today culture is not for a force a good anymore. When you turn on the news you always see some innocent teen murder by a coward law enforcement officer. Studies already show that police officers responsible for the deaths were neither charged with any crime, nor taken to trial (). Police are supposed to make us feel safe, but instead we have fear for life because we do know if it's going to taking away from us. This fear also happen to us when we go out places because now security checks are not enforce everywhere.

Read More
1169 Words | 5 Pages

Alexis Clarke Professor Frank English 110 29 October 2015 Gun Control Will Not Eliminate Crime The big issue of gun control in the United States, is that many people believe that it takes away the 2nd Amendment rights, which is the right to bear arms. Citizens of the United States are promised the the right to bear arms in the Constitution, and by applying gun control laws takes away that same right. Crime is high enough in cities with very few laws pertaining to gun control, but taking guns away from people who are registered with license will not solve the problem either. Placing more limitations on gun owners, particularly responsible gun owners, will not reduce gun violence.

Read More
214 Words | 1 Pages

Police officers should be armed because it helps reduce crime, can handle more dangerous threats, and save more lives. Armed police officers is a deterrent to crimes. Cops not armed with a gun would be more vulnerable because criminals will know that they won 't be shot and the criminal could be Carrying a gun. If criminals know that cops are carrying guns, they won 't be as likely to

Read More
1390 Words | 6 Pages

Moreover, guns are ineffective for self-defense in many situations. In other words, the risks outweigh the potential advantages by far. Moreover, what is right should not be abandoned, only because it is difficult to implement. It is time that the ownership of guns is restricted to those who need them for professional reasons. The result would be a safer and better

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Gun Control

Related Topics

Open Document