Nowadays, there are a lot of the extensively arguments, especially in the United states, whether the policies should carry guns. Recently, this argument is widely raised due to news of the police shooting the innocent people extremely effects the negative opinion to them. Someone opines that if the policies are allowed to carry guns, they will have a high tendency to make more crimes. On the other hand, the police having a gun will decrease crimes. However, in my opinion, the polices should have or carry guns while they are on duty with the limitation of the power of using guns
As I mentioned above, the guns is still extremely needed for the police on their duty. Without the guns, if there are crimes or unremindable situations occurring, the police could not give the security to innocent people including themself from those situations on time. The guns will be used as a weapon for the polices to protect themselves and people while they are attacked by the attacker on the duty. Therefore, the polices with guns is still substantially requested for the people’s security in case of the happening of the situations as mentioned above.
In my country, Thailand, the death
…show more content…
These situations reflect to a lack of inspection and carefulness before committing any actions of the polices. Therefore, in term of my view, there should be an imposition of the laws or regulations to limit the police’s power in using guns. There must be a highest punishment for the impropriate and wrong committing of polices in using guns. This step will take effective on the police’s action, they will increase more awareness on their action in every time whether it is reasonable or actual need to use guns. This way may reduce the number of crimes occurring from the police’s action with the