ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Gun Control

731 Words3 Pages

Gun control is used as a vote getter for many left-wing politicians, is it really as simple as they make it seem? Well as it may not surprise you, many if not close to 100% of voters who vote libertarian, republican, conservative, and other middle to right-wing groups vote against gun control. How can such a vast majority of people be so short-sighted or just plain dumb, or should their argument be looked into and valued? Only the numbers will reveal the truth.

America as a whole is very political, are gun rights simply a way for politicians to appeal to their conservative base, or do they have a positive impact? According to a study from Harvard, [1] “Nations with stringent anti-gun laws generally have substantially higher murder rates than those that do not… European nations with the lowest rates of gun ownership, (5000 or fewer guns per 100,000 ) population have a combined murder …show more content…

Politicians often debate this cause along their partisan views. In recent court cases such as District of Columbia Vs. Hellen and Mc.Donald vs Chicago courts ruled in favor of the an individual’s right to bear arms. Because of the amendment’s wording that is written as “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” Some people believe this only applies to military. In response Anthony Scalia said [6] , ”The Second Amendment is naturally divided into two parts: its prefatory clause and its operative clause. The former does not limit the latter grammatically, but rather announces a purpose. The Amendment could be rephrased,’Because a well regulated Militia is necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.’” after the District of Columbia vs. Hellen ruling. The argument came to a

Open Document