ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Gun Control

731 Words3 Pages

Gun control is used as a vote getter for many left-wing politicians, is it really as simple as they make it seem? Well as it may not surprise you, many if not close to 100% of voters who vote libertarian, republican, conservative, and other middle to right-wing groups vote against gun control. How can such a vast majority of people be so short-sighted or just plain dumb, or should their argument be looked into and valued? Only the numbers will reveal the truth.

America as a whole is very political, are gun rights simply a way for politicians to appeal to their conservative base, or do they have a positive impact? According to a study from Harvard, [1] “Nations with stringent anti-gun laws generally have substantially higher murder rates than those that do not… European nations with the lowest rates of gun ownership, (5000 or fewer guns per 100,000 ) population have a combined murder …show more content…

Politicians often debate this cause along their partisan views. In recent court cases such as District of Columbia Vs. Hellen and Mc.Donald vs Chicago courts ruled in favor of the an individual’s right to bear arms. Because of the amendment’s wording that is written as “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” Some people believe this only applies to military. In response Anthony Scalia said [6] , ”The Second Amendment is naturally divided into two parts: its prefatory clause and its operative clause. The former does not limit the latter grammatically, but rather announces a purpose. The Amendment could be rephrased,’Because a well regulated Militia is necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.’” after the District of Columbia vs. Hellen ruling. The argument came to a

Show More
Related

Pros And Cons Of Amend The Second Amendment

1721 Words | 7 Pages

The Gun Lobby and the National Rifle Association mistakenly believe that the Second Amendment not only guarantees an individual’s right to own firearms, but also limits the making and enforcement of any laws limiting the use of and ownership of guns. There is no constitutional law that prevents the government from limiting personal access to firearms through legal means. The argument over the right to bear arms should not be about whether the right belongs to the people; but rather, it should address the purpose and scope of that right. According to Dennis Henigan (2005), “Arms-bearing in the well-regulated militia was a duty owed to the government, not a personal right to be exercised against the government,” (D 21). The right to keep and bear arms is basically different from the other guarantees in the Bill of Rights.

Read More

Essay On Right To Bear Arms

1205 Words | 5 Pages

The right to bear arms has been a controversial issue ever since James Madison established it as the second amendment of the constitution. The second amendment states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” (US Const. amend. II). Those in favor of the second amendment, believe that arms are used for protection, dangerous situations, and sports.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Stricter Gun Control Policy

578 Words | 3 Pages

Kleck, Kovandzic, and Bellows (2016) in a study targeting more than 1000 cities that had a population of about 25,000 people in 1990 confirm this assertion when they conclude that there in deed was no tangible evidence supporting the notion that gun ownership has an impact on crime rates. If I am to believe this premise, I am likely to notice that the various mass shootings witnessed in the U.S. in the recent years were likely to have been caused by other factors such as the lack of stringent laws to ensure background checks before one can buy a gun. Even so, this argument can only be true if the number of deaths caused by the guns is relatively low compared to other major causes of

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Gun Control

553 Words | 3 Pages

Most peopl who want to get rid of our right to bear arms are blind to the fact that the constituition actually states that we have the right to bear arms. Tbe 2nd amendment staes “A well regulated miltia being nescicary to the security of a state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed”(Gunrights pro con). Our nation was found on these ideals and this documents gives us the rights that we cannot be taken away. So if its in the constituion we should not change it, since it is obviously our right to have a concealed weapon. So to conclude we have rights as we the people and you can not take them

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Gun Control

1087 Words | 5 Pages

There is a very heated and divided debate going on in America. This debate would be over gun control and more specifically the Second Amendment. The Second Amendment protects the individual's rights to bear arms. It comes down to whether or not gun control regulations should be tightened and if they should then they would most likely interfere with an individual's right to bear arms. Many people believe there should be stricter gun laws, however it would interfere with people's existing rights.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Gun Control

828 Words | 4 Pages

Another reason why gun control is barely talked about is because political people do not want to approach the topic, they could potentially lose supporters. If a political campaigner is for gun control some of their supporters could be against gun control and vice versa. It was not until 1992 when politicians openly showed they were for gun control. In the book "Shots in the Dark”, it stated that Bill Clinton was the first politician to be for gun control. Bill Clinton openly endorsed the death penalty as a result of gun control.

Read More

Gun Control Vs California

417 Words | 2 Pages

Gun control has been and is a very hot political topic. Trying to make changes in gun control goes back and changes some of the core beliefs our country was founded on. What does the Constitution say? “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”. I will explain what has been changed and what people are trying to change.

Read More

A Rhetorical Analysis Of Mom's Demand Action

1092 Words | 5 Pages

Majority of the people who oppose gun control believe that it violates the Second Amendment. The Revere Journal says that “In terms of the substance of the Second Amendment, the notion of a militia has no practical meaning today relative to what that term meant in the late 18th century. We are long past the days when farmers left the fields to become de facto soldiers, or when posses were rounded up to chase outlaws, or when settlers were on their own in a hostile environment. Some pretend that a lifestyle that no longer exists still has meaning in the America of the 21st century.” The people that agree on needing strict gun control laws will find a stronger connection to this image compared to the people who oppose

Read More

Gun Politics Pros And Cons

1640 Words | 7 Pages

Through examining both sides of the argument,

Read More

Persuasive Essay On Right To Bear Arms

1297 Words | 6 Pages

The right to bear arms has been a controversial issue ever since James Madison established it as the second amendment of the constitution. The second amendment states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” (US Const. amend. II). Those in favor of the second amendment, believe that arms are used for protection, dangerous situations, and sports.

Read More

The Ethical Debate Of Gun Control

1991 Words | 8 Pages

The Second Amendment says, “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” Gun rights has become the subject of intense political, social, and cultural battles for much of the last century. The pro-gun right side has asserted that the right to arms was absolute, and that any gun control laws infringed that right (Kopel, 2013). This right has been supported by the Supreme Court who has reinforced what has become the American consensus that the Second Amendment allows the right to keep and bear arms, especially for self-defense, and that it is a fundamental individual

Read More

Argumentative Essay On Gun Control

1430 Words | 6 Pages

The right to keep and bear weapons is protected by the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution, which is a part of the country's Bill of Rights. According to the amendment, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be violated since the security of a free state depends on a well-regulated militia. This means that Americans have the right to carry guns when doing so is reasonable and necessary for their safety. Over the years, the Second Amendment has been debated and has grown to be quite contentious for a variety of reasons. It is regarded as one of the most significant articles in the Constitution since it gives American individuals a way to defend themselves.

Read More

Persuasive Essay Against Gun Control

1386 Words | 6 Pages

According to the Second Amendment, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” The Second Amendment specifically states that “the right of the people to keep

Read More

Arguments Against Gun Control

1141 Words | 5 Pages

This is a frequent argument that is used. The conclusion of the argument is that there should not be new laws for gun control, based on the premise that we need guns because we have the right to own them and that we need them to protect ourselves in times of need. People also use the Second Amendment to defend their argument. The second amendment states, “...the right of the people to keep and bear arms will not be infringed” (Lund, Winkler).

Read More

Gun Control Causes And Effects Essay

489 Words | 2 Pages

The majority of Americans that are against stringent gun laws in the U.S. say guns are more widely used in self-defense and that they discourage criminals from committing violent crimes (Celinska, 234). There are two main purposes for owning guns, defense and recreation. Hunters for example would be against gun laws because they use guns for recreational shooting and hunting. Also people that might have grown up in a gun free environment or an antigun culture maybe through higher education would see gun control as more achievable. “Guns don’t kill, people do” according to the NRA and criminals don’t obey laws (Gregg, 68).

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Gun Control

Related Topics

Open Document