ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Gun Control

1087 Words5 Pages

There is a very heated and divided debate going on in America. This debate would be over gun control and more specifically the Second Amendment. The Second Amendment protects the individual's rights to bear arms. It comes down to whether or not gun control regulations should be tightened and if they should then they would most likely interfere with an individual's right to bear arms. Many people believe there should be stricter gun laws, however it would interfere with people's existing rights. There are many reasons why the laws should not be tightened such as it infringes upon the Second Amendment, it would also interfere with the process of purchasing a gun and finally it would change a law that has been in place for almost 250 years. …show more content…

There are restrictions on buying firearms, regulations and background checks required before purchasing a weapon. Many people say it needs to be more tedious process and have stricter laws about this but gun control will not work. ¨What gun control law would have stopped the killer? Limiting ammunition magazines to 10 rounds? Restricting sales of semiautomatic rifles to one a month? Per year? Banning "assault rifles"?¨ (Farago, 1). The laws put in place will not stop a criminal if the want to shoot a place up murder is already illegal but that is not stopping them. If a person is not afraid to murder someone then what is a gun control law going to do to keep guns out of their hands, the answer is nothing. People will get hands on guns if the want to get them. A prime example that gun control does not work is Chicago. They have some of the strictest gun control laws in the nation and it has an extremely high gun related crimes. They have laws but criminals are disobeying them. If it does not work in Chicago then it will not work for the rest of the country. There is no reason to take guns away from law abiding

Show More
Related
226 Words | 1 Pages

stricter gun laws are not needed in the united states. One argument is , if guns were outlawed criminals would still find ways to arm themselves. Gun control laws won’t stop mass shootings. Most shootings are from criminals that want to kill people like gangs kill people because they don't give them the drugs.

Read More
930 Words | 4 Pages

Strict regulations and limitations have been pursued already and clearly do not suffice. Statics brought to attention by gun control opponents, show that gun control laws have done little to reduce crime rates. Several restrictions have been made on certain guns, considered as overly dangerous, though in the hands of an unstable criminal even a legal hunting gun can be deadly. Countless restrictions have been made, however people have still found ways around them. If people are unstable and determined enough, they will find a gun, regardless of the restrictions or regulations.

Read More
822 Words | 4 Pages

Therefore, the law needs to improve. In the present time, gun control laws are the much crime, the laws have to be changed so that it will be much easier for everyone to live without being afraid. Keeping guns away from people will reduce the amount of death each year. My first reason on why gun control should be strict is because there are massive shooting going on around the world these days. Few months back there is a terrorist attack in Paris, many people were harm and some innocent citizen were even killed by the attack.

Read More
193 Words | 1 Pages

With all three of these reasons, it's safe to say that the law for gun control shouldn't exist. The law will end up disputing the Second Amendment and the protection of citizens who are in dangerous situations. This would also give the government much power. No matter what, if a person has high intentions to murder a person with a gun, they’ll do whatever it takes to get one in their position and they will be able to obtain the firearm. Also, when planning to commit a crime, when has the criminal ever in history taken the law into consideration before planning and further committing the crime?

Read More
329 Words | 2 Pages

Gun control laws have become too much. There are too many gun control laws in the United States. Laws are not going to scare criminals who have a past record or are set on hurting people. Firearms can protect people that have valuable items on them or in their house. There is becoming less criminal with the more purchases or weapons.

Read More
1155 Words | 5 Pages

Gun control laws restrict law abiding citizens from exercising their constitutional rights while doing little to keep the criminals from obeying the law. “The Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States reads: ‘A well- regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.’” (Bernards 41). The Second Amendment directly states that citizens have to right to “keep and bear arms” without their rights being

Read More
800 Words | 4 Pages

In the United States, a single violent crime takes place every 26.3 seconds (FBI National Data). Many people have their own ways of thinking to help stop these crimes from happening. These ideas vary from harsher penalties for crimes to banning our weapons. Gun control laws will not help prevent crimes from taking place. The criminals will still obtain the weapons, it will only lead to more victims, and people will still find other ways to kill each other.

Read More
703 Words | 3 Pages

Insecurity The first and perhaps the most obvious reason stricter gun control laws are unnecessary is stricter gun control has proven to be ineffective. Chicago, the city with the strictest gun control laws in the United States of America just had a shooting. This shooting, a regular

Read More
715 Words | 3 Pages

Gun Control is Not the Answer Increasing gun control will not decrease crime, but changing the ways in which we punish the crimes will. When you think about crime the first thing that comes to mind is gun control. However, there are already numerous laws on the books that are not being followed. Criminals do not follow the laws and that is the problem. The punishments for crimes do not fit the bill and criminals figure even if they get caught the punishment really is not that bad so they may as well do the crime.

Read More
1389 Words | 6 Pages

Gun control has decreases the amount of gun violence in the United States. But if you think about it, if there is gun control or not criminals will always find a way to get a gun. The problem is that criminals can get guns. Everyone else can have gun and be fine as long as they know to use it properly and safely. All it takes is a little knowledge in firearms and then people will be smarter about everything.

Read More
708 Words | 3 Pages

The ban was ineffective. In fact, the U.S. Supreme Court made Chicago repeal its handgun ban in 2010, because they deemed it unconstitutional. Jumping over to Florida, who unlike Chicago, enacted a right-to-carry law. When the law was implemented in 1987, the murder rates went down and stayed down. This is proof that gun control is ineffective at reducing crime on its

Read More
753 Words | 4 Pages

Overall gun control was started to give people the feeling of being safe and that they will be safe not harmed. It needs to be thought harder, and longer of so that it will have that base to start from. Gun control may help but it will also need some adjusting to it that will not invade people of their privacy and there life. It is meant for the safety of people not the harm. The law intends on keeping the gun owner’s safe, and keeping everyone in good hands not just the pro-gun

Read More
810 Words | 4 Pages

The key factor is that guns don’t shoot themselves. People with bad intentions, mental minds, bad behaviors are the ones who hide behind a gun for violence. A lot of people have guns illegally, which is a major issue because it leads to more violence,murders, and deaths. The laws shouldn’t be focused as much on the gun control, but into the reasons why people are killing. The biggest countries with the highest gun control are the ones who have the most deaths from guns.

Read More
707 Words | 3 Pages

Gun laws give too much power to the government and way less from the people, which will lead to government corruption. And, stated by ClearPictureOnline.com,”Guns don 't kill people, people do. We need to concentrate on the values and morals of our citizens and at the role the media plays in glorifying violence and the lack of respect for law.” (Shootout: Do We Need More Gun Control Regulations?) What people don 't understand is that they are taking away their own freedoms with Gun Control.

Read More
1044 Words | 5 Pages

First of all, gun control laws would reduce gun deaths. Many deaths in the United States are caused by guns. For example, “There were 464, 033 total gun deaths between 1999 and 2013[.] 270, 237 suicides (58.2% of total deaths); 174,

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Gun Control

Related Topics

Open Document