ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Human Experimentation

3876 Words16 Pages

Human experimentation has been and always will be a debate to whether it should be considered immoral or moral. To many, human experimentation is what has brought all of the medical and science advancements we know and use today, to others it's one of the most inhumane ideas we have actively participated in. But for some it's a question that can't be answered as a yes or no. Either way you look at it though, it can be easily seen that the way we have done human experimentation and for most, the reasons for doing them are immoral and definitely should be considered one of the worst ideas used in history. Human experimentation is definitely a topic worth understanding. Not from just one side but both, the more informed you are, the more you'll …show more content…

This question is where the debate between whether or not human experimentation should be considered immoral can get intense. For each side of the argument, it depends on the type of person you are and your beliefs. More than usual if you are a scientist, doctor or have a biased opinion towards a field like it, more than likely you would go towards the human experimentation side, that human experimentation was worth the things that have happened and has saved more lives than were killed. To people that may have had friends and/or family members that were part of experiments, or just has the opinion that it is wrong to experiment not only on our species but any species when conducting experiments to harm or that could potentially harm they see it as not only immoral but wrong. A quote from a respected source known as (Health) gives a great quote on the ideas that human experimentation is necessary but gets a bad misjudgement, for reasons that are understood. “Despite the compelling need for tests on human subjects and the resulting benefits for mankind, human experimentation has drawn considerable criticism. Particularly controversial has been the use of human subjects for research that does not specifically entail the benefit of the subject. This is termed non-therapeutic experimentation. Its most grotesque form occurred during the World War II in the well-documented “experiments” conducted by the Nazis on prisoners in concentration camps. At least 26 different types of experiments were conducted for the explicit purpose of gaining medical and scientific information, with the larger goal of benefiting the German people and race. The Nazis “experimentation” was in fact torture--it was characterized by coercion and lack of consent; the use of men, women, and children in blatant disregard of their health and

Show More
Related
429 Words | 2 Pages

Did you know that some prisoners in concentration camps during WWII were subjected to serious, and sometimes fatal medical experiments done on them? There are three different categories of medical experiments. These experiments were only done to help the Nazis survive during that time. Hitler was originally the one who gave the german physicians permission to do these horrific experiments on innocent people.

Read More
1741 Words | 7 Pages

A large part of Major Problems in American History since 1945 involves the struggle for human rights, whether based on race, religion, creed, or sexual orientation. However, one group of human subjects, those participating in medical experimentation, was lacking any protection of basic human rights until gaining attention in the 1940’s. This struggle persisted well into the late 1970’s and is still an important area of debate today. A primary-source supplement should be added to Major Problems to discuss the battle for the protection of human subjects in medical experimentation. Although the topic lacked significant national coverage like other human rights movements, unethical practices in medical research affected many people and has been

Read More
1193 Words | 5 Pages

During World War II there were a series of experiments conducted by the Nazi’s on all people besides those of the “Aryan Race”. There is much controversy surrounding this topic due to the specific motives of these experiments and whether or not it would ethically and morally fit to use such data collected. These experiments included seawater injections to figure out a safe way to desalinate salt water to make it drinkable, hypothermia tests and the period of time humans can withstand these conditions without becoming unconscious, and starving subjects to see how long it would take them to die. On the opposite side of the common opinion of this topic, there is the idea that the cruel experiments done by the Nazis were for learning purposes and should be used to help the medical field.

Read More
2216 Words | 9 Pages

One of the most horrible features of this time period was the Nazis' medical experiments on prisoners in concentration camps. The atrocities performed by the Nazi dictatorship during World War Two have left a lasting impression on history. Due to their eugenics and racial ideologies, the Nazis subjected people they judged "unworthy of life" to cruel and horrific experiments, such as forced sterilization and twin research. These experiments constituted a grave violation of medical ethics and human rights due to the absence of informed permission and the contempt for the humanity of its test participants. Although these studies added to our understanding of science, the price was much too high, and they continue to serve as a warning about the

Read More
727 Words | 3 Pages

This perverted experiment occurred with some success. However it was not as successful as the Warm Bath.” - The Holocaust History - A People's and

Read More
886 Words | 4 Pages

Human experimentation can be extensively characterized as anything done to a person to figure out how it will influence him. Its principle target is the procurement of new exploratory information instead of treatment. In the event that a trial is at last advantageous to others or even to the subject himself, this doesn't imply that treatment filled a critical need. Humans have long been used as subjects for a variety of experiments.

Read More
1161 Words | 5 Pages

The twin experiments at Auschwitz were pioneered by Dr. Josef Mengele, who arrived at Auschwitz in May of 1943, and he chose to perform his twin experiments on the Jewish children (Rees, 2005). The children called him “Good Uncle,” because Mengele would bring sweets, toys, and new clothes for his “guinea pigs” every morning (Rees, 2005). This was a manipulative tactic used by Mengele that caused the innocent, yet ignorant, children to trust and cooperate with their, “Good Uncle,” Dr. Mengele. During the experiments, some children would have their arms tied up up to three times a week to restrict blood flow and then blood would be drawn, at times enough blood would be drawn that the children would lose consciousness (Rees, 2005). As they were

Read More
789 Words | 4 Pages

The focus of this book was narrower than the title suggests. It should have been entitled: Arianism among the Germanic Tribes. The book seeks to explain the Germanic (barbarian) acceptance of Trinitarian Christianity within their own world views and time line. Marilyn Dunn notes that the Germanic tribes had a concept of one god, or one supreme "being" or "spirit." This correlates with God the Father who is revealed by his Son, Jesus Christ.

Read More
477 Words | 2 Pages

Why the government should not have 100% control of human experimentation. The government would have too much control over human experimentation. They could possibly abuse their power. Human experimentation is not safe and should not use human experimentation because it's not safe.

Read More
1027 Words | 5 Pages

Introduction: Human experimentation has been a contentious issue for a long time, and philosophers have been engaged in a debate on its moral permissibility. Some argue that it can be morally right if appropriate changes can be made, while others claim that it is inherently wrong and, therefore, will always be morally impermissible. This paper aims to explore the debate between two philosophers, Beecher and Hellman, who hold different views on human experimentation. Beecher's Argument Beecher's argument is that human experimentation can be morally right if it is carried out in a way that minimizes harm to participants. He argues that experiments should be designed to benefit humanity, and the risks involved should be outweighed by the potential

Read More
221 Words | 1 Pages

Using Nazi data is unethical, the era abused human subjects in various ways. The experiments were done without informed consent will make a research unethical and therefore, using data of unethical experiment is also the same. Moreover, we should keep in mind how the use of data will bring an effect to all the people. If scientists started using this data, there is a possibility that in future such experiments will become common and humans might be exploited in various ways. In addition, appropriate data was not collected in many experiments, they did not had any intention of progressing in scientific knowledge coupled with, imposing suffering on those they considered minor.

Read More
1066 Words | 5 Pages

Animal experimentation is unacceptable because it is unethical. The article “Animal Experimentation” it states, “many people object to the use of animals in scientific studies because the animals are denied their freedom and often suffer serious injury and discomfort.” People disagree with animal experimentation because the animals do not have the freedom to choose. Animals cannot speak for themselves to tell whether or not they want to get tested on, because of this then the animals that are tested on suffer a lot of discomfort and injuries. Another reason why animal experimentation is unethical because it is unreliable.

Read More
1111 Words | 5 Pages

Although the experimentation of animals has furthered medical knowledge, it should not be allowed because it is brutal and animals are unable to give their approval. In order to do a study on humans it must be authorized by them, where animals are unable to give consent, which strikes questions in the world of science on whether this is morally acceptable. Although animal experimentation can result in saving the lives of millions, many find it to be cruel and unjust. Seeing as animals are unable to speak for themselves, they are still able to express their emotions through their behavior.

Read More
922 Words | 4 Pages

Medical Research has the potential to advance society and make life better for everyone in it. However, the ends cannot justify the means; the rights of the subjects of research cannot be violated no matter the possible benefit to mankind. Despite this, time and time again, it has been very easy for, at least allegedly well-meaning scientists to violate the rights of their research subjects because they wanted to help society as a whole. Such experiments were not performed in secret by a minority of scientists; they were often done “by respected investigators at leading medical institutions and were published in medical journals (Scandals and Tragedies 3). " It is vital that we understand the circumstances of these experiments and why they happened so

Read More
944 Words | 4 Pages

If someone searches human experimentation online it will tell you that human experimentation can be broadly defined as anything done to an individual to learn how it will affect him or her afterwards. Experimentation on a human being is the experimentation of humans to help find cures and to help fight off things like illnesses or diseases. It can also help provide us with the medicine and knowledge of what medication should be used to treat the injury or illness medication treats things. Like headaches, sore muscles, injuries, and many more things. There is a lot of debate over human experimentation and whether it is right, if it works, or if it is needed at all.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Human Experimentation

Related Topics

Open Document