ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Human Experimentation

3876 Words16 Pages

Human experimentation has been and always will be a debate to whether it should be considered immoral or moral. To many, human experimentation is what has brought all of the medical and science advancements we know and use today, to others it's one of the most inhumane ideas we have actively participated in. But for some it's a question that can't be answered as a yes or no. Either way you look at it though, it can be easily seen that the way we have done human experimentation and for most, the reasons for doing them are immoral and definitely should be considered one of the worst ideas used in history. Human experimentation is definitely a topic worth understanding. Not from just one side but both, the more informed you are, the more you'll …show more content…

This question is where the debate between whether or not human experimentation should be considered immoral can get intense. For each side of the argument, it depends on the type of person you are and your beliefs. More than usual if you are a scientist, doctor or have a biased opinion towards a field like it, more than likely you would go towards the human experimentation side, that human experimentation was worth the things that have happened and has saved more lives than were killed. To people that may have had friends and/or family members that were part of experiments, or just has the opinion that it is wrong to experiment not only on our species but any species when conducting experiments to harm or that could potentially harm they see it as not only immoral but wrong. A quote from a respected source known as (Health) gives a great quote on the ideas that human experimentation is necessary but gets a bad misjudgement, for reasons that are understood. “Despite the compelling need for tests on human subjects and the resulting benefits for mankind, human experimentation has drawn considerable criticism. Particularly controversial has been the use of human subjects for research that does not specifically entail the benefit of the subject. This is termed non-therapeutic experimentation. Its most grotesque form occurred during the World War II in the well-documented “experiments” conducted by the Nazis on prisoners in concentration camps. At least 26 different types of experiments were conducted for the explicit purpose of gaining medical and scientific information, with the larger goal of benefiting the German people and race. The Nazis “experimentation” was in fact torture--it was characterized by coercion and lack of consent; the use of men, women, and children in blatant disregard of their health and

Open Document