ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Humanitarian Intervention

447 Words2 Pages

To make a valid agreement for whether to be in favor of or against human rights prosecutions and humanitarian intervention one must look at both sides. However, that will not be enough. Every country is different; ideologies, norms, culture language and the list can go on forever. It is important to look at these factors as well when one looks at these cases. The United States of Americas decision to bomb Libya in 2011, was a decision that has been justified to save lives. Before and during the Libyan conflict the Obama administration had a fear that without intervention a genocide would happen. This justification is a part of a UN-endorsed document called Humanitarian Intervention. This doctrine states that foreign military intervention is needed when nation-states do not or unwilling protect its citizens from gross human rights violations. However, this doctrine has created more problems than solutions in Libya. Human rights violations increased after the death of Gaddafi, and political turmoil has also increased. This universal jurisdiction to attack Libya created domestic unrest, …show more content…

They should have followed Kathryn Sikkink three enforcement mechanisms. These enforcement mechanisms are meant to be non-violent and used in a way that can influence other countries to do the morally right thing. The first mechanism is shaming. Shaming can help change cultural norms that in turn influence the political scene. Economic coercion is the second mechanism but it doesn’t include sanctions. Sanctions affect and hurt the average citizens the most. The third way to influence a country is by prosecuting violators of human rights. Prosecuting these people affect neighboring countries as well. By putting pressure on neighboring countries leaders to not commit human rights violations. These enforcements might be slow in action, making present atrocities worse. However, they do prevent larger atrocities from happening in the

Show More
Related

How Did The Cold War Influence Canada

1701 Words | 7 Pages

This war was fought between Muammar Gaddafi, the former leader of Libya, and his loyal forces versus those wanting to overthrow his government (Encyclopaedia Brittanica, Libya revolt of 2011). Gaddafi had refused to step down, and had been using violence against protestors and demonstrators to remain in power (Encyclopaedia Brittanica, Libya revolt of 2011). Deaths and injuries were increasing by the thousands catching the attention of the intercontinental crowd, which compelled NATO to answer the United Nations’ call to the international community to protect the Libyan people (NATO, NATO and Libya). A coalition of NATO allies and partners intervened on March 21st, 2011 with the intention of defending civilians against attacks by the government 's forces (NATO, NATO and Libya). This operation was under the command of Canada’s Lieutenant-General Charles Bouchard, who helped enforce an arms embargo and no-fly zone policy (Government of Canada, NATO operations).

Read More

Why Do We Fight For The Rights Of Others?

773 Words | 4 Pages

To many, violation of human rights is a serious issue. This shows that for every negative force, there is always someone who recognizes the wrong and seeks to correct

Read More

Summary Of A Problem From Hell: America And The Age Of Genocide

1189 Words | 5 Pages

During the events leading up to the killings in Rwanda the United States government exercised caution in becoming involved. Powers states, “The president could have deployed U.S. troops…” (154) once the killing of thousands of Rwandan citizens had begun regardless of congressional opposition, through the War Powers Act of 1973. Which states, the president has the power to send troops abroad for 60 days without congressional consent, and then after denial has 30 days to bring them back. The author feels that the president should have shown more initiative considering the country’s history of a strong presence and involvement around the world. Aside from sending military troops, the government had plenty of other options.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of US Military's Occupation Of Iraq

788 Words | 4 Pages

There is no doubt that the United States government made mistakes during the military’s occupation of Iraq. Outside of the fact that they should not have been there, the actions taken there were irresponsible and proved to be fatal. Once the nation was offended by US military presence, the society went into chaos. About 4,000 Americans died in Iraq alone. The United States proved to act on impulse during this tragic event.

Read More

Rwanda Genocide Response

635 Words | 3 Pages

The American Government 's Response to The Rwandan Genocide The United States often have an had interest in the political, social and civil crises of other countries in order to benefit themselves. American senior officials hid the truth of the Rwanda Genocide to avoid public moral obligation. The government did not give any financial or political support to the country because Rwanda did not offer minerals or political advantages and stability; the US ' government did not want to be involved in another conflict, even though it has helped other countries in the past.1 But what is truly deeper hidden, are the stories of people like Immacule, a young girl, who, unlike thousands of others, survived the catastrophic genocide in Rwanda.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of The United States Declaration Of Killing

687 Words | 3 Pages

The year begins, mass killings continue, and also the u. s. government has nevertheless to declare what's happening in Asian nation and Syria “genocide.” By now, the proof is overwhelming: ISIS is consistently eradicating Yazidis, Christians, sect Muslims and alternative ethnic and non secular minorities in territories controlled by the FTO. What’s at stake is quite an issue of semantics: A declaration of killing has important legal and ethical implications that might need the u. s. – and likeminded countries – to try to to no matter it takes to rescue the refugees and finish the killing.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of The US Invasion Of Iraq

975 Words | 4 Pages

Should the United States have attacked Iraq?       Introduction: On the 20th of March 2003, the United States commenced a war against Iraq and destroyed Saddam Hussein’s regime because they thought Iraq was a threat to the world. According to Presidents, Historians, journalists, and Politicians, it was not a necessary attack and it was a big mistake from The United States, that war was inequity and they declared war to take advantage of Iraq’s land.

Read More

Genocide Dbq Analysis

680 Words | 3 Pages

D). In Document A “study the problem of genocide and to prepare a report on the possibilities of declaring genocide an international crime.” Although this would have been a great action to protect civilians value during the Nazi crimes, which were inhumane. However, due to the “lack of adequate provisions and previous formulation of international law, the Nuremberg Tribunal had to dismiss the Nazi crimes,” (Doc. A). The international government have not payed attention to serious issues concerning their people.

Read More

Obama Hero Or Villain Essay

839 Words | 4 Pages

This was a measure put in place to trap the leaders of the legitimate Libya and also to cut off Gaddafi and his people from the outside world (including any of his allies in other governments and nations: all members of the African Union were also barred from entering Libya). Libya, had fast falling to the roving Al-Qaeda mercenaries and criminal rebels on the ground while simultaneously having its resources, infrastructure and cities bombed by NATO air-strikes, was entrapped with no way out and moreover with no way to express the truth of the situation to any outside observers. The resolution passed by the UN Security Council on 17th March authorized member states "to take all necessary measures... to protect civilians and civilian populated areas". What this really meant was 'all necessary measures... to protect rebel-held

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of The 2003 US Invasion Of Iraq

1089 Words | 5 Pages

Even after toppling Saddam Hussein, the US army found close to no evidence of Iraq possessing weapons of mass destruction (Nawaz & Sagalyn, 2023). In fact, a main US weapons inspector said, “we were almost wrong,” in 2004 talking about the weapons of mass destruction (Council on Foreign Relations, 2017). The fact that America did not find any weapons of mass destruction in Iraq automatically makes this invasion unjustified. This is because since none of these weapons were found, this means that the whole basis for this invasion was built off of lies. Millions of innocent people lost their lives or their loved ones due to a lie.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Humanitarian Intervention

840 Words | 4 Pages

This term has remained controversial regarding the motives behind it, whether the intervention was purely based on individual states’ interest, sovereignty, group of states, or by the United Nation. Several perspectives also come from the society, humanitarian intervention seen as a way to free the miserables out of the violation of human rights conducted in a state. However there are also some against this idea, humanitarian intervention could weaken a state’s sovereignty, and is potential to break the rules applied in UN charter, and it is also might threaten the international stability caused by the use of armed force in applying the humanitarian intervention itself.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Economic Sanctions

689 Words | 3 Pages

This dilemma places the sanctioning country in a precarious position of deciding between pushing their national agenda to violate human rights by depriving the target country of the means to do so, or do they withdraw their economic ‘power’ to ensure the humanity of the civilians in the target country? Another reason sanctions are not as effective as leaders hope they are is because the target country 8 can utilize backchannels in the black market or encourage other nations to subvert their agreements to ensure their needs are met. This degrades the global order because it increases illegal activities and additional violations of international law rather than effectively deterring it through the sanction. Even worse is the harmful effects sanctions can have on the sanctioning country’s own economy in the form of increasing unemployment and impeding domestic markets. If trade is cut off, industries will undoubtedly suffer as a result.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of R2P Initiatives

737 Words | 3 Pages

These Pillars are developed to ensure that States do not cause harm to their own citizens and cause these four specified crimes and violations: Genocide, War crimes, Ethnic cleansing and Crimes against humanity. However, if it becomes clear that a State is failing its

Read More

Muammar Gaddafi's Impact On Sierra Leone

1198 Words | 5 Pages

It was recently remembered by the indictment of one of the character involved in the conflict. Charles Taylor questioned the international community in the reason to why Gaddafi was not in trial as he was (FERRAN & SCHECTER, 2011). This enquiry aggravates when considering the recommendation of Sierra Leone’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission, which addressed Libya to pay reparations in the war’s aftermath (University of Notre Dame, n.d.). Gaddafi’s participation has been kept in a low profile and there are few sources that have recognized the possibility of his involvement in the matter. It is for these reasons that this essay assesses to what extent Muammar Gaddafi, Libya's leader, influenced the development of Sierra Leone’s Civil War from 1985 to

Read More

Just War Theory And Utilitarianism

1763 Words | 8 Pages

Was Iraq an unjust war? A debate on the Iraq war and reflections on Libya. International Affairs. History.com Staff. (2009).

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Humanitarian Intervention

Related Topics

Open Document