ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Net Neutrality

1835 Words8 Pages

It is the year 2018, Apple has just created an iPhone X, YouTube is having a meltdown, and Google is one of the most popular websites to ask any questions. How could people know this? Why does this matter? For most people living in 2018, this is what they care about. The Millennials and Generation Z kids care about the internet and what happens to it more than they care about newspapers, radio, and television. Which is why it is mainly these people who are worried about the FCC dismantling the net neutrality rules. Net neutrality, for those people who do not know what the phrase means, were rules put in place during Obama’s presidential run in 2016. These rules stopped internet broadband companies from charging more for certain services, and instead let all the content on the web be treated equally, whether it was mail, video streaming, or any kind of data. By repealing these rules, the FCC is …show more content…

In simpler terms, this means that the internet service providers could potentially allow the businesses who pay more to have their websites and internet data be at faster speeds than other businesses and websites. Some will argue against this, but without net neutrality forcing the internet providers to have equal internet for anyone and everyone on both sides of the equation, it would not be too hard for these businesses to change a few minor things. In fact, in a court case, Verizon v FCC that happened in 2013, the attorney for Verizon said that the company may be interested in paid prioritization (“Will the FCC’s,” 2018). Now while this did happen in 2013, there is still the fact that a representative of Verizon stated they would not be opposed to paid prioritization. With the rules barring that line of thought gone though, who is to say that Verizon will not jump on the change to be able to allow some changes to make paid prioritization a

Show More
Related
652 Words | 3 Pages

When starting out the article, Smith begins by building up the idea and argument of net neutrality. He uses rhetorical questions, giving his audience the ability to begin building up their own opinion

Read More
961 Words | 4 Pages

Net-neutrality is the principle that providers of Internet services enable access to all contents with no prejudice or discrimination against sites or products regardless of the source. In December, the U.S. government repealed the national regulations that prevented “Internet Service Providers from blocking legal content, throttling traffic or prioritizing content on their broadband networks” in favor of a “looser set of requirements that ISPs disclose any blocking or prioritization of their own content.” In summary, the government has decided to change net-neutrality and make it easier to profit from. The government’s want, and subsequent success, to change the strict guidelines by which net-neutrality operated with is supported by the Chairman

Read More
1604 Words | 7 Pages

In our day and time, using the internet as our main source of information is very common. In Nicholas Carr’s essay on “Is Google Making Us Stupid”, he discusses how the internet is redeveloping the way each human thinks, feels, and learns. Carr feels the internet is taking over how we, as people, are transforming the way we comprehending different subjects. The internet is an essential part of this world and everyone’s lifestyle who has access to it. There has been a generous amount of reliance upon the internet doing a variety of tasks that, in the past, others had to do for themselves.

Read More
918 Words | 4 Pages

They will have fewer restrictions, can choose the speed of Internet given to customers, and can also voluntarily include details of privacy and regulation within their terms of contract. Aside from ISP’s, hundreds of companies might have their businesses be positively or negatively affected by this rule, depending on the size and revenue of the company. Smaller companies and startups with less money will most definitely struggle to keep up, and may have to reevaluate business plans in order to keep up with the new age of Internet. Larger companies and ISPs will thrive; these businesses have the money to be able to survive in a new environment that relies heavily on a firm’s ability to cover the cost of competition, and all that it entails. On the investment side, broadband investment was already down $1 billion after the announcement of the 2015 net neutrality rule.

Read More
1269 Words | 6 Pages

So naturally when looking to see what others have said about this text, it found that they were all mostly in favor of net neutrality. Gregory down talks a recent ruling by the FCC, that after research, seemed to be something he should be praising. This is what the FCC changes actually did, This decision is a major legal victory not only for the FCC, but for all internet users (including you, since you're reading this online), who will continue to benefit from the Commission's open internet rules. These rules safeguard the principle of net neutrality, by preventing internet service providers from abusing their gatekeeper role to block or interfere with the ability of users to access the content of their choosing.

Read More
1006 Words | 5 Pages

He claims that people should remain vigilant when openly accepting any computer network or technology. Carr’s viewpoint from start to finish is that the Internet is shifting the way that the present age group thinks, by changing the way we develop information.

Read More
1274 Words | 6 Pages

Top Telecom Companies and ISP’s addressed the FCC in Federal Court saying, “It will cause irreparable damage, immense burdens, causing serious and substantial harm to service providers and consumers” (Nuechterlein and Weiser 182). This idea allows the rhetoric a chance to settle and fester in the minds of consumers. Phase two, make the public think that the Federal government's meddling will hurt their bank accounts. This idea is presented to the consumer by telling them that anything the Federal Government wants to get involved in is for the purpose of taxation. Consequently, Internet Service Providers have begun releasing statements that the government’s plans are to tax them in every way imaginable for us if the internet (charging per stream, per email, per download).

Read More
1477 Words | 6 Pages

As some of us might know there has been a passionate debate on the issue of the net neutrality in which there is strong feelings on both sides of the debate. Net neutrality is the idea government should regulate the internet so that the major telecommunications companies won’t be able to turn the internet landscape into a monopoly. This paper will examine both sides of the net neutrality debate in which the content of this paper will explore both the pro and cons of net neutrality. At the end of the paper I will reveal my true thoughts about net neutrality and will discuss what I have learned about this issue in the process. Some of the pros of net neutrality include easy access to information, promotion of free speech and promoting innovation for smaller internet companies.

Read More
496 Words | 2 Pages

In the last twenty to thirty years, a vast surge of technological innovation has swept over the world. The internet is a giant collection of databases stored all over the world, allowing anyone with a computer and internet access to view virtually their heart desires. Today the internet has blown up into a juggernaut of political activism, business schemes, and freelance writing. In his 2008 article entitled, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” published writer Nicholas Carr goes to the depths of the current global debate regarding beliefs that the internet has changed the way humans think.

Read More
649 Words | 3 Pages

Some people may believe that the internet is changing the world in a bad way. In the article “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” the author, Nicholas Carr, talks about how he believes that the internet could be taking over the world. Carr believes that the world relies on the internet entirely too much. To some people, his argument could seem valid because almost everyone in today’s technological driven world look towards the internet and search engines like Google to answer their questions rather than trying to figure it out themselves and learning from their journey to find the answer.

Read More
739 Words | 3 Pages

Most people are arguing whether the internet is harmful to human’s life or not. The most representative article of this controversy topic was Nicholas Carr - < Is Google Making Us Stupid?> in 2008. In this article, Carr stated that the internet has begun to change our ways in many aspects. For example, the Internet has begun

Read More
687 Words | 3 Pages

With net neutrality these privately owned network corporations were forced to follow certain rules which strips them off their rights. The 1st Amendment protects the freedom of expression, so regulation of what providers can put on their networks is an invasion of their freedom of expression, and without net neutrality the providers finally have a say in their networks and can run them the way they want now. The New York Times gave a quote by the Trump Administration saying _ÑÒ(the net neutrality rules) were intended to safeguard free expression online_Ñù, and this is true that net neutrality removes expression from the internet, which is one of its fundamental

Read More
1148 Words | 5 Pages

Since the republicans want to get rid of net neutrality, companies can charge a lot more and can also slow down their opponents to put them out of business. These companies will also be able to form monopolies and have even more control than they do now. Five of the main republican candidates for the 2016 presidential race were very against net neutrality and wanted it gone, which again shows the conflict between the candidates and their voters (Edwards). In 2017, Ajit Pai wanted to get net neutrality repealed and put a new system in place. Although

Read More
988 Words | 4 Pages

However, in Pai’s proposal to dismantle net neutrality, it literally says that they wish to dismantle net neutrality. Another argument is that it is unfair to charge everyone the same price, which is like saying it’s unfair to charge everyone the same price for an iPhone (Todd Wasserman). Another argument is that the internet remained free before 2015, and questions why we would even need rules for it. The thing is, the FCC has tried to get Net Neutrality laws going for year. Several lawsuits were filed against Comcast during 2006 and 2007 for attempting to impose secret data caps and hidden fees for no reason on users.

Read More
1212 Words | 5 Pages

They are all connected at the same speed and you do not have to pay extra to access certain websites. << CHANGE SLIDE >> This is an example of what it could be like without net neutrality rules in place. i. While completely blocking a website would be considered a violation of the first amendment, without net neutrality, there would be nothing stopping your cable company from let’s say slowing Netflix’s connection speed down just to the point where your videos are always buffering and the only way to stream your movies in HD without issues is to buy a “premium speed package” from your ISP just for them to feed you Netflix at the speed you originally pay for. ii.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Net Neutrality

Related Topics

Open Document