In the article,”What Americans Keep Ignoring About Finland’s School Success,” Anu Partanen discusses the numerous changes that were made to the Finnish education system, such as eliminating inequality between students, in order to give all students the chance to receive a proper education. While reading the article, it is understood that Finland was not always on the bridge of success. it was a country that was in need of reform, which many believed to be impossible at the time. Some of the changes that were made during this reform included several aspects, with the stress on equality being number one Partanen states, “the main driver of Finnish education policy has been the idea that every child should have exactly the same opportunity to
“And there are no private schools in Finland”. The author put this into her article because the fact that people in Finland have a way better education than the people in the United States do is truly amazing. They go to school for free in Finland. American schools compared to schools in Finland are just way different. “Finland’s success is especially intriguing because Finnish schools assign less homework and engage children in more creative play” (Partanen).
AZ Educational system The Arizona education system has been determined as ‘poor’. Many Arizonaans report saying that some districts around AZ have been a very bad educational place. People report saying that schools have put their funds unfairly to the students. Districts in cities all around Arizona have been seen as unfair and bad education to citizens. Cons
Growing away from the interests of teacher unions started with the first charter school in Minnesota. Minnesota’s charter law failed to include universal teacher certification requirements and automatic collective bargaining rights for teachers. It also failed to prevent the creation of charter schools that targeted particular ethnic and racial minority groups, therefore many charter schools were founded that aimed at a particular group such as Somali students (p.14). Furthermore, Democratic President Clinton supported the charter school movement, thus a lot of federal money was spent on founding new ones.
Many students want to go home and please their parents with a good test score. It makes them feel accepted. To a child, their parents being proud of them is the best thing that they could receive. But in middle school, many students are failing those tests, getting bad grades. The only difference between elementary school and middle school is more individual topics and recess.
Over the past years, Charter schools has gone through its ups and downs. There are different sides to charter schools. Like every other schools, charter schools have its pros and cons. Charter schools are independent schools that receives government funding. Unlike public schools, they operate privately.
Charter schools are a different type of school that is helpful to some students but not all. What a charter school is, they are privately managed, taxpayer funded schools which are made up from the community. However charter schools are not like private schools they are in fact outlined after public schools. Charter schools are for students who want to achieve a high level education. The schools are open to all children, they don’t charge tuition and there are no special requirements for them to attend.
You would not think that charter schools would replace public schools. I went to a charter school, when I was in the seventh grade and I feel that charter schools are nothing to talk about. “Charter schools are tax supported public schools.” They can be started by anyone, if the school board approves it. If the school board approves the charter, they would need to get a budget started and hire teachers and start a curriculum.
First, the charter school is funded by the local, state and the school does follow the same rules of the public school. Some of the rules include: length day for students 6 and half hours daily and five days a week; students school year days should total 180 days; teacher should be license teacher; child must be at least 5 years old to attend kindergarten; student’s attendance records must be kept on file; student’s school records and reports must keep on file, and confidently; child’s parents or legal guardians must register the child; and students must follow the school’s absence policy (Rules Of The State Board Of Education, 2008). Then I said, “one of the things that makes charter schools different from public schools is charter schools
A charter school is one that is established by charter and run by teachers, parents, and other members of the community. It uses tax money but does not have to run in adherence to the rules of a particular district, city, or state (Merriam-Webster). Recently, many states have initiated programs to create privately funded charter schools as an alternative to public education. This has created many positives and negatives amongst the educational stakeholders. Parents and students are left debating over whether to leave traditional educational options behind and become a part of the new educational trend of charter schools.
Charter schools have an effect on certain communities; unlike public schools understudies’ populace, outsized debate encompasses contract schools in numerous communities. In Pennsylvania, the leaders of NAACP bucked intense pressure from charter schools and endorsed a determination requiring a ban on the extension of the contract and for more grounded oversight of these schools. Charter schools have an effect on their communities of Urban Public schools. Philadelphia is one of the districts that charter schools pose a threat to the district’s finances. In 2003, the Philadelphia district spent 7.9% of the general funds on charters schools and by 2012, the schools are up 23.7% of the funds (WashingtonPost).
There have been many controversial discussions about whether it is a good idea to extend the school year or not. An extended school year would be beneficial for students, parents, and the schools themselves. An extended school year would be a benefit to students. If the school year was longer students would be able to learn more material, and go deeper into subjects.
Abortion: A contrast between an ethical and a legal point of view: Abortion is ending the pregnancy of the woman for different reasons, it may happen spontaneously then it is called miscarriage or could be induced and is called abortion. There are many methods abortion can be done, using pills, surgery, chemically or earlier using herbs. The way varies according to the pregnancy age, for example, the way used in the first trimester of pregnancy cannot be used in the second trimester. Abortion has been a major controversy since early ages over its ethical and legal viability because there isn’t a consensus whether a developing embryo can be counted as a human being, more explicitly if it is killing a human life or not.
Students' intelligence aren't measured at all for the first sixed years, so they can focus more on learning, collaboration, and personal needs rather than competing with other students for an "A". The difference between the "weakest" and "strongest" is the smallest in the world. About two thirds of students attend college, and that is the highest rate in all of Europe. They also have longer breaks compared with other schools, and teachers only spend four hours a day in the class room and two hours for extra help. Today, Finland's education system is proven to be most effective, and students outperform most of the world.
So, this what i find in USA's education. In fact, the education in USA has a lot of beneficial system that attract me such as it contributes to increase in production, as boys and girls are taught to respect for productive work and the belief that they can rise in economic standing through work, effort and the desire to go where opportunities exist. USA public schools apply the best quality models in education and are role models in all educational systems in the world. I am talking here about primary and secondary schools. For example, the views about my children in USA’s school and their way of assimilation of information quickly, however they are not perfect for the English language, but that did not prevent them from understanding easily.
