Back in the early days of independant America there had been an ethical dilemma on whether or not they should ratify The U.S constitution. The main two arguments were whether citizens chose to maintain the status quo, or switch to a more centralized government. The two debates were backed up by James madison who wrote the Federalist No.10 for ratification and Patrick Henry who gave a speech against it. In the document James warns about how “there is nothing to check the inducements to sacrifice the weaker party, or an obnoxious individual.” referring to someone or a group of people who could possibly create unique factions between on another and disrupt a potential republic.
At the time that the Constitutional Convention took place, the North was industrialized and produced many finished goods. The South, however, still had an agricultural economy. Therefore, the South imported many finished goods from Britain. The North wanted the government to be able to impose import tariffs or taxes on finished products. They wanted this to help protect against foreign competition and encourage the South to buy goods made in the North.
1. Personally, I believe the constitution was the better document because it had more power. The articles of confederation gave the states more power than congress had, and because of this states either did was it said or did not. Because of the states having more power over Congress, the states did not focus on the needs of the whole country but only cared for their own state and what is best for their people. The constitution is better because it was easier to make changes and amendments to it.
Before ratifying the Constitution, a constitutional convention was called in 1787 to change the Articles of Confederation. This meant that each state had only one vote in Congress, and the size didn’t matter. The debate was between the federalists and Anti-Federalist, one side wanted to ratify the constitution and the other side didn’t. It was not easy because there were documents and articles both supporting and going against it. Who are the federalists?
1. The Constitution originally lacked a Bill of Rights. George Mason from Virginia presented a proposal to add a bill of rights to the document. But his offer was voted down.
The young nation, barely three years old, was dying. Ten years after the Declaration of Independence, America was struggling to hold itself together. The Articles of Confederation, designed during the Revolution, demolished even the inkling of monarchy by forcing the national government to abide by the whim of the states. During the Revolutionary War the states held together out of necessity, but after the war, the states became hostile to their neighbors. It quickly became evident that a serious crisis has settled upon the United States.
The Constitutional Convention met in Philadelphia, on May 25, 1787. Most of the delegates were from the upper classes of American society. The most famous delegate, George Washington, was “unanimously elected president” of the Convention (Cassel, 1994. P. 119). Originally, the delegates intended to revise the Articles, however their debates resulted in a whole new constitution.
The new constitution couldn’t please everyone. Some people liked it but some didn't. The two sides were the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The Federalists were in favor of ratifying the Constitution, whereas the Anti-Federalists were opposed to it. They would have debates about ratifying the Constitution.
I feel that the US Constitution is somewhat outdated, and is in need of a revision. As everybody knows, the world has changed a lot in the past 250 years. These changes are things like transportation, total number of people in the world, and major things like the internet and technology. The events and problems that the Constitution solved years ago are a lot different than the problems that we face today. However, some of the more universal and basic rules of the constitution should not be subject to change because they still apply to today.
It states that the United States Constitution is the highest law of the country and that all states must uphold the Constitution and all of its rules (“Sixth article”). This is important in modern time because we don’t want our leaders and higher officials to be against the very Constitution that makes our country the United States. If state and federal officers are bashing the very rules that make our country work how can it work at all. The sixth article wants all higher officials that have a part in any governmental sayings to uphold and respect the Constitution that is our
art VI) ; This basically says that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land. If a state law conflicts with federal law or is even unconstitutional then it cannot be enforced. The federal laws will always triumph the state
I believe the constitution created a just government, threes pieces of reasons for my claim are Impeachment, Congress has power to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises, Ability to amend the constitution. To begin, the Senate has the sole power of impeachment to remove the President, Vice President, and all civil officers of the united states for treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors (Article 2, Section 4). The importance of impeachment is to remove the corrupt and wrong doers from positions of power. With this you can make sure that no one is above the law, no matter the position you hold.
World War One, a global war, was the beginning of changing of how wars would be fought. Many changes in both military and civilian technology began a result of "The Great War". When Archduke Frany Ferdinand of Austria was assassinated by a Serbian nationalist in Sarajivo, Bosnia, in June 1914, threats escalated and mobilization orders followed. The central powers, Germany, Austria-Hungary and the Ottoman Empire,was pitiful against the Allied Powers, Great Britain, France, Russia, Italy, and Japan. In 1917 the United States joined the Allies.
wer is distributed between the nation, state, and local governments evenly through a system called federalism. In the United States, both the national government and the state have a large measure of sovereignty. In addition to the expressed powers of the government, the “necessary and proper” clause provided an avenue for expansion into the realm of “implied powers.” Federalism is involved with complicated relationships among the many states. The “full faith and credit clause” makes the states honor the public acts and judicial decisions of other states, and the “privileges and immunities clause” states that states cannot discriminate against someone from another state.
When presidents today confront challenges, the office grants them incredible powers. It is with great trust that the president must use these powers with care and in the best interest of the nation. “Expressed powers are those powers specifically granted to the president in Article II, Sections 2 and 3, of the Constitution.” The Constitution list powers granted to the national government known as expressed powers. For example, Article II gives the president the power to command the armed forces Article II states that “the executive power shall be vested in a President of the United States,” and includes the President as “Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States” and has the power to “take care that the laws be faithfully executed.”
