ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of The Iranian Nuclear Agreement

803 Words4 Pages

“If the world is to be spared even worse turmoil, the U.S. must develop a strategic doctrine for the region.” That was former Secretaries of State Henry Kissinger and George Shultz warning us about the consequences of the Iran nuclear agreement this spring.

While the White House negotiated with Iranian political leaders, the United States stumbled through the Middle East. The missteps include failure to support the green revolution in Iran in 2009, red lines in Syria that didn’t really exist in 2012, a small effort to defeat ISIS in 2014 and continuing today and strained relations with Israel for six years. That is not a strategy. The winners and losers of the Iranian nuclear deal, however, are clear and help us understand what is at stake. …show more content…

Iran currently has shorter-range missiles that reach Israel and now there is money to buy more. And with the agreement lifting restrictions on international trade with Iran, Russia will soon be selling advanced anti-aircraft system to Tehran which military experts believe can defeat the latest American and Israeli aircraft.

Another potential loser in this agreement is the region itself. This agreement almost guarantees a nuclear-arms race in the Middle East. There is no way that Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Jordan, and Turkey will stand idly by while Iran is free to lay the groundwork for developing nuclear capacity. Saudi Arabia has already stated their intention to obtain a nuclear-weapon capability. Jordan, our most reliable Arab ally, is considering nuclear energy and has stated a desire to enrich Uranium.

The United States will also lose unless it assesses its own security posture in the deal’s aftermath. The agreement allows Iran to continue development of Inter-Continental Ballistic Missiles which have one purpose: the delivery of nuclear warheads. Once they have ICBMs they will be able to reach the United States and this strike capability will be ten years or less from

Show More
Related

President Reagan Military Strategy Essay

537 Words | 3 Pages

There is a great deal of risk in the strategy spoken by President Reagan because of the imbalance between ends, ways and means. Lykke provides a conceptual framework and vocabulary for describing risk in strategy in his “three-legged stool” model. His main point is that a balanced strategy is solid, but if ends, ways, or means are not aligned, the strategy incurs risk (Reading C203 D, p. 4). In the spoken strategy there is especially an imbalance between the ends, ways and means to the desired end of a unified and free Europe. The ways in the strategy is only directed towards the city of Berlin.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Treaty 6

433 Words | 2 Pages

Treaty 6 was signed on August 23,1876 at Fort Carlton and less than a month later on September 9, 1876 in Fort Pitt. Some Chief’s had expressed concern regarding being able to sustain this new way of life. They did not want to potentially lose touch with their way of living and the resources their lands possessed. The First Nations people had requested that the government aide their people with agricultural assistance, as well as help during times of famine, and pestilence. The Canadian Government was also asked if they could assist them with modern medicines.

Read More

Ap Us Foreign Policy Dbq Essay

1094 Words | 5 Pages

In the aftermath of WWII, the US stood as one of the few powers relatively unharmed, as well as the sole nation in possession of nuclear weapons. This afforded the US a great degree of power and leadership in the world. However the USSR was another great power that managed to avoid much destruction from the war, and besides being ideologically opposed, matters were complicated after the USSR developed nuclear weapons for itself. This prompted the formulation of a new foreign policy. Document 7 states that the US “must organize and enlist the energies and resources of the free world in a positive program for peace which will frustrate the Kremlin design for world domination.”

Read More

Ronald Wyden Biography

808 Words | 4 Pages

This gives Iran the opportunity to immediately resume it’s nuclear activity after the fifteen year timeline comes

Read More

Essay On What Principles Did Ronald Reagan Draw On For The Cold War

311 Words | 2 Pages

To accomplish all these goals Reagan had to carefully construct a plan that's end goal was the Soviet Union's negotiated surrender. Of all the major political figures Ronald Reagan held the most unique position

Read More

How Did Ww2 Impact The Working Environment In The 1940s

1577 Words | 7 Pages

Currently, America and other countries had a deal with Iran called the Iran Nuclear Deal in which Iran need to limit nuclear activities. This is one example that shows that America knows the power of new technology bombs can

Read More

Pearl Harbor Research Paper

830 Words | 4 Pages

The day ended with the heavy scent of oily smoke instead of the cool tropical breezes usual to Hawaiian weather. The hard wails of ambulances and clamor of emergency crews replaced the soft crash of waves against serene beaches and calming music of a ukulele. Deep colorful sunsets of paradise vistas were replaced with the dark crimson of make-shift hospitals to treat the multitudes of wounded and dying. On 7 December 1941, The Imperial Japanese Navy (IJN) attacked Pearl Harbor. President Roosevelt accurately captured the sentiment of The United States when he addressed Congress, “Yesterday, December 7, 1941—a date which will live in infamy—the United States of America was suddenly and deliberately attacked by naval and air forces of the

Read More

Summary: Military Aggression And Homeland Security

933 Words | 4 Pages

Consequently, it must soon decide whether it goes to war, or accepts a significant decline in its self-appointed role and adopts power-sharing. As the United States edges ever closer to Iran, it appears that an eventual armed conflict remains the likely result. "We’re going to take out seven countries in 5 years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran" General Wesley Clark, former Supreme Allied Commander of

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis

1304 Words | 6 Pages

Since entering office, President Donald Trump has taken a hostile stance towards Iran, and now threatens to end the era of rapprochement that prevailed during the Obama Administration. This would be a significant mistake that would bode ill for both the United States and Iran. While detractors of President Obama’s policy towards Iran argue that it strengthens the oppressive regime of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, the opposite is actually true. Friendly relations between the United States and Iran undermine the fear mongering rhetoric of Khamenei and his hardliner allies and strengthen the arguments of the reformist coalition in Iran. The success of this more moderate faction of Iranians serves United States’ interests in that it eliminates an

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Atomic Bombing

472 Words | 2 Pages

An airstrike probably only destroy a few of their weapons not enough to make them stop fighting in the war. If the United States wants real damage they would have to drop a number of airstrikes to make real damage, that is a waste of weapons. Why not just drop the atomic bomb and have a greater impact than releasing a big quantity of airstrikes? The atomic bomb will get the work done in a few seconds and will be more efficient than shooting bunch of

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Pakistan's Nuclear Jimmy Carter

177 Words | 1 Pages

Pakistan’s nuclear Jimmy Carter's agenda when he became president in early 1977 because he brought a significant commitment to reducing nuclear armaments and to checking nuclear proliferation. As the U.S. seeks to deter the possibility of terrorists gaining access to nuclear weapons, it must consider carefully its policies toward Pakistan. Despite Pakistan's arguments that its nuclear weapons are safely guarded, the U.S. must construct and implement policies that proactively thwart the unwelcome possibility of Pakistan's nuclear weapons falling into the wrong hands. The best chance for success will lie within a framework premised on a robust U.S.-Pakistan partnership based on trust and mutual understanding.

Read More

Political Satire

1155 Words | 5 Pages

Iran is going to take over the Middle East. Iran -- and somebody else -- will get the oil." We spent $2 trillion in Iraq. We lost thousands of lives. We have thousands and thousands of wounded soldiers.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Iranian Embargo

900 Words | 4 Pages

According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, Iran has the world's fourth-largest proven crude oil reserves. “Oil is key for Iran, and it has gotten around the sanctions by using the black market” (Eggan). Accepting the agreement would lower oil costs even

Read More

Adolf Hitler's Revisionism In World War II

709 Words | 3 Pages

The critical moment has probably passed” 2. In withdrawing from the League of Nations and the Disarmament conference,

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Banning The Atomic Bomb

862 Words | 4 Pages

Proliferation groups are trying to get the US to lead the way and destroying and disarming their atomic bombs in hopes that other countries will follow. Forster proposes these ideas in his own words. "The goal of the treaty is to "prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and weapons technology, to promote co-operation in the peaceful uses of nuclear energy and to further the goal of achieving nuclear disarmament and general and complete disarmament."(Forster). The US cannot just say disarm your weapons and not do the same themselves. The US needs to take charge and start things themselves.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of The Iranian Nuclear Agreement

Related Topics

Open Document