The author of “ColoradoCare: [sci] Universal healthcare plan has democrats divided” is Josiah Hesse on Friday, May 20, 2016. The article “ColoradoCare” [sci] is slanted towards the supporting side of universal healthcare. The author only mentions democrats by name and hardly says anything about the republicans. However, you can also tell that the article is bias in the sense that he only talks about all of the politicians who are against the universal healthcare. The author of this article is just trying to make everyone that doesn’t support ColoradoCare [sci] look bad.
The article could have been a little better as in terms of word choice. The article is really just trying to make your decisions for you. They are essentially just shoving it down our throats. The article is informing you about
…show more content…
He successfully does this by giving you statistics instead of just summarizing what would happen if ColoradoCare [sci] passed.
The article is slanted towards voting yes on Colorado care. You can tell this by the way the author only mentions people who support universal health care.
The author gives you statistics and actual statements from interviews.
No I don't agree with the author because from what I understand he is for Colorado care and I am against it because I know that it would skyrocket taxes.
The author wrapped up the article with a satisfactory ending. He made a valid point saying, just because politicians vote no doesn't mean that it won't pass. I thought the author wrapped it up nicely.
My overall response to the article is that there is an overwhelming bias for voting yes. I found that the author was informative but once again bias. There wasn't really a thesis statement, but his overall thesis is that you should vote for ColoradoCare [sci]. All in all the author could have stated his thesis. If he had the article would have been a little bit