How Would You Compare And Contrast George Orwell's Freedom?

1093 Words5 Pages

Niyazi Nabiyev Reading and Writing IV Compare Contrast Essay – Final Draft 20.05.2014 Totally freedom can be described as: “The right, given to people by God, to create their own choices.” You freedom cannot be damaged by any power other than God. Humans can always work out their freedom when selection. However, when their choices come incompatible with the rules set by a greater energy, they might experience repercussions depending on how they select to use their freedom. The more limitations enforced upon someone’s freedom the more limited their capability to create choices become. The level to which someone may work out their freedom can be described as their “freedom.” Therefore, the more rules enforced upon …show more content…

Whenever you want during this dangerous occasion Orwell could have created the decision to do as opposed to what the mob of Burmans desired. When he was experienced with the choice of whether or not to capture the elephant he could of created the decision to not to capture it. In reality, that is exactly what he desired to do: “I did not want to kill the elephant.” Actually, his choice to pay attention to the mob and not to his own moral sense was, in itself, an act of freedom. Totally freedom is unbreakable and existing in all choices. Freedom is very essential to humanity. Conflicts have been battled to protect independence. Why? Because independence can be taken away and damaged by man. Sometimes to be able to protect our independence man must battle for it and take it returning from the man who has taken it away. However, freedom has always been an got high top quality of humanity. We need not battle for it for it cannot be taken away or damaged. Totally freedom is unbreakable. George Orwell explains his anti-imperialist views when he states, “I perceived in this moment