followers can achieve maximum performance through the process of shared vision, clarify mission and organizational goals and objectives, encouragement, and positive motivation (Butler, 1999); transformational leadership embraces the idea of maximizing the followers’ full potential to optimize their performance (Bass & Avolio, 1990); transformational has a positive impact on both organizational and followers’ performance (Diaz-Saenz, 2011); autonomous, encouragement, and motivation enhances work performance in more complex and arduous tasks (McCleskey, 2014); it is more predictive of individual or organizational performance (Bass, 1985). There are suggestions in offering the advantageous reasons of the transformational approach such as the style …show more content…
Nevertheless, both styles are not limiting to certain deficiencies as well as advantageous. According to Northouse, the followings are the strengths or advantages of the transformational style: (a) widely researched – the style had been studied and analyzed for over three decades; there are a plethora of evidence this approach does work in certain circumstances, (b) intuitive appeal- it is an instinctive admiration without resorting to in-depth persuasion, (c) process between leaders and followers – continuum of interactions between the leader and the individual, (d) broader view of leadership – paradigm-shift with converging in the “out-of-the-box” thinking, and (e) emphasis on employees’ needs, values, and norms- individualized attention and accentuate on personal development and growth (Northouse,