ipl-logo

Trophy Hunting Persuasive Essay

1142 Words5 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Essay pros and cons of trophy hunting

ShouShould the world regulate trophy hunting given the issues the world ecosystem is facing right now? Trophy hunting is a “sport” in which people pay money to hunt animals and take a part of the animal as a trophy back home. The controversy around trophy hunting is split in the middle where one side says that trophy hunting has its benefits, while the other side argues that it’s cruel and should be stopped. Trophy hunting should be regulated because it destroys the ecosystem and will make animal species in that ecosystem go extinct. With the regulations passed the earth ecosystem could heal from human exploitations. Therefore, regulating trophy hunting is necessary in order to stop the destruction of the earth’s ecosystem, end destruction …show more content…

Trophy hunting is over hunting predators thus leading to a sharp decline in their population. The drawbacks of trophy hunting are visible in the ecosystem where they are being hunted. In “Wolf Restoration” by the National Park Service, it states, “Also in the 1960s and 1970s, national awareness of environmental issues and consequences led to the passage of many laws designed to correct the mistakes of the past and help prevent similar mistakes in the future” this was the consequence of removing a top predator from the food chain. When a top predator is removed from the food chain, the ecosystem suffers a prey population explosion and eventual collapse of the ecosystem. The predators keep prey in check and prey keeps vegetation and insects in check. If the predator or prey population is overhunted, then it’s the other population that suffers because it destroys the natural balance, so one population cannot live without the other. An example is the wolves of Yellowstone National Park, where the farmers nearly hunted them to extinction to stop them from eating all their livestock. Soon the farmers saw what happens when they remove a predator from the food chain. This leads to the other reason trophy hunting should be …show more content…

Some trophy hunters' main weapon of choice is a bowhunter with 50 percent of the animals being wounded but not dead. In “Hunting” Peta addresses the pain and suffering animals endure when being hunted: “A study of 80 radio-collared white-tailed deer found that of the 22 deer who had been shot with “traditional archery equipment,” 11 were wounded but not recovered by hunters” in other words trophy hunters would shoot the animal with a arrow but intentionally let the animal escape, so they could chase it down. This causes a lot of suffering to the animal before dying, which is unnecessary and cruel. While most of the reasons why trophy hunting should be regulated are valid, there is critic that argue for the

Show More
Related
1217 Words | 5 Pages

This also shows how hunting doesn’t just cause extinction, but also makes an area less protective. The protaganists made sure that people such as Drake McBride and Jimmy Lee Bayless should always be avoided in the wilderness. Even though some of the animals are dangerous, they taught us that anyone should have some type of shelter no matter what the cause

Read More
634 Words | 3 Pages

To some people rifle hunting isn’t fair for the animals, because it’s a high-powered weapon and can kill them

Read More
490 Words | 2 Pages

Although it is a big part of life, it is easy to see the other side of the coin, how bad it is and why it should not be allowed. “Why i hunt” is an essay by Rick Bass that describes why he loves to hunt, and the reasons behind. He says the experience is almost euphoric, that it is not the death of the prey that is enticing, it is the hunt itself. It is the tracking

Read More
842 Words | 4 Pages

This matters because when there is too much of one animal it throws off the whole ecosystem. People are trying to ban hunting because of poachers but there's more to hunting than some poachers. For example, in the text “FROM THE EDITOR: Gone hunting.”

Read More
797 Words | 4 Pages

Sadly, many Americans believe that losing the wolves would not be a bad thing for the prey’s sake, but in all reality losing the wolves would be devastating. One major thing that is present in all ecosystems, the place in which animals live, is a trophic cascade. A trophic cascade is explained in the essay as a “sequence of impacts down the food chain” (578). Hannibal gives the reader this example: “…In Wyoming’s Yellowstone National Park … wolves were virtually wiped out in the 1920’s and reintroduced in the ‘90s. Since the wolves have come back, scientists have noted an unexpected improvement in many of the park’s degraded stream areas”

Read More
313 Words | 2 Pages

The biggest threat of big game hunting is killing these animals and using them

Read More
555 Words | 3 Pages

On page 3 of the article they say that if hunting were to be abolished animals such as deer will become a problem because of overpopulation. This means that deer could create problems for farmland as they could eat and stomp on the crops. Hunting is what keeps the deer population from growing too large since the population of the deer’s natural predators are too small to keep the population of the deer stabilize. Deer are not the only animals that are stopped from creating problems with the ecosystem. Animals such as warthogs and the Springboks are also hunted to stop problems such as destruction of

Read More
1555 Words | 7 Pages

Every year hundreds of wild, exotic animals are killed, primarily in Africa, for money, bragging rights, and even decoration. Big game trophy hunting is a booming business, but has sparked a worldwide debate, especially after the killing of Cecil the Lion. Trophy hunters claim they are helping conservation efforts, but in reality, they are harming them. This sport is damaging the overall population of a species, especially lions, rhinos, and elephants. Also, the overall revenue from big game hunting is a small amount, and only a small percent of that goes to help the community.

Read More
520 Words | 3 Pages

Hunting permits cost money. The money raises depending on the size of the game and location. People will bid thousand close to millions just to go hunt a trophy animal as stated on The Rhino Hunter, “paid $350,000 for a hunting trip to Namibia to shoot and kill an endangered species”. Yes sometimes they do go hunt endangered species but what people don’t know is they go hunt the older animals, the animals that bring danger to the rest of the species. These bids all the money that

Read More
543 Words | 3 Pages

Looking at the outrage with Cecil the lion would make it logical to make poaching and general violence against animals illegal. That's a bit moral of a debate, and as someone who eats meat I feel a bit uncomfortable talking about ethics with animals, but I think killing animals for sport is wrong regardless of what goes on at

Read More
1171 Words | 5 Pages

There are a lot of hunters and very few lives of animals taken. Only one percent of hunters actually get game. At a price of only sixty dollars a tag, there 's only sixty dollars worth of game killed for every six thousand dollars in tag sales which goes to the government. Hunters also buy equipment which helps private businesses and retailers. Hunting is a massive business that doesn 't just benefit the hunter, but many

Read More
754 Words | 4 Pages

Some may disagree that hunting’s purpose is to hunt the animals only and not to destroy their ecosystem which is true sometimes. They agree

Read More
973 Words | 4 Pages

Poaching and illegal hunting can cause an off set in the ecosystem by overhunting animals. When one animal population decline drastically, other organisms are affected too. The decline in native predators is the main cause for overpopulation of animals like deer. Deer overpopulation has led to rapid decrease vegetation life causing other animals to be put at risk. Removing predators from the food web disrupts the entire balance of an

Read More
723 Words | 3 Pages

In conclusion, hunting benefits the environment in many ways including population issues and starvation that our ecosystems face yearly. In many countries, hunters are required to use every usable piece of the animal. Many people around the globe depend on the hunted game for nutrition and economic uses by balancing predator-to-prey relationships. Hunting is a natural, ethical sport that has existed for a very long time, reaching back into pre-history. We should support hunters because they benefit the environment, communities, and ecosystems across the

Read More
793 Words | 4 Pages

B. Still, trophy hunters kill roughly 600 of these animals every year, compounding lions ' to other threats, like habitat loss and retaliatory killing as an endangered species. ( Pimm. Pg 2 ) II. Hunting is clearly not the same as is was in the good old days.

Read More

More about Trophy Hunting Persuasive Essay

Related Topics

Open Document