United States Postal Service Synthesis Essay

848 Words4 Pages

Synthesis essay: It is no secret that the world's technological abilities are exponentially growing. The past 100 years have seen more fast-paced technological developments than any era that preceded it. It often seems like with how fast our society is developing, it is easy to leave things behind and stop using them just as quickly as they came. This idea really applies to the United States Postal Service (USPS). The fact of the matter is that the United States Postal Service is losing money. To combat this, USPS needs to restructure their organization to meet the needs of our ever-changing modern society. By reducing the number of workdays, increasing postage fees, and strategically restructuring some branches, the U.S. Postal Service will …show more content…

This source argues that it is ok for some branches to be closed, but only if it is done in a strategic manner, “You don’t need a full-service post office every few blocks in New York, for example. Some centers are for letters only, others for packages. That way you cut down on staff size and service required to and from each” (Source A). Source A recognizes the amount of detail that needs to be applied when implementing this strategy. By strategically consolidating and restructuring branches, the USPS would not only be able to save money and continue to cut down on the $238 billion projected loss in revenue, but also be able to become a more efficient organization (Source A). Overall, by embracing this approach, the USPS can adapt alongside and continue to ensure its place in our ever-changing society. Implementing new pricing and different schedules into USPS needs to happen quickly. The article “Postal Service Expected to Announce Significant Changes” written by Ed O’Keefe in 2010 (Source C), calls attention to this bleak reality. Source C starts by stating that “The U.S. The Postal Service will release projections Tuesday that confirm for the first time the suspicion that mail volume will never return to pre-recession [2008]