ipl-logo

Was The Detonation Of The Nuclear Bomb Justified?

1630 Words7 Pages

The use of the Nuclear Bomb to bring an end to WWII stands as one of the most controversial and significant decisions in modern history raising the question, Was the detonation of the Nuclear Bomb Justified? The Nuclear Bomb was developed as part of the Manhattan project by Robert Oppenheimer. Its purpose was to force a Japanese surrender, with the subsequent ending of the war. The bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August of 1945, marked the first and only use of nuclear weapons in warfare.This raised ethical and moral questions about the human and environmental consequences of their deployment, fuelling debates on disarmament, non-proliferation as well as the concept of mutually assured destruction. This cardinal decision on how to end the war plagued leaders of the …show more content…

Some believe that the bomb was the most efficient and ‘least abhorrent’ way to end WWII, while others believe the nuclear bomb was a tool used to influence the post-war world order and was completely unjustifiable. Central to the discourse surrounding the Nuclear Bombings are the contrasting viewpoints of traditionalists and revisionists, each offering distinct interpretations of the bomb's necessity and justifiability. The detonation of the nuclear bomb is a historical topic of debate. The traditionalist position is that the bomb was necessary to end the war. This is epitomised by President Harry Truman and his quote that “The atom bomb was no “great decision.” It was merely another powerful weapon in the arsenal of righteousness.” This reflects the prevailing view among military officials and policymakers at the time. Truman's opinion conveys the belief that the use of nuclear weapons was a justifiable tool to end the war, serving as a conclusive tool, forcing a Japanese surrender and bringing an end to

Show More
Related
582 Words | 3 Pages

Wilson D. Miscamble offers a clear and concise argument in favor of the use of the atomic bombs in The Most Controversial Decision: Truman, the Atomic Bombs and the Defeat of Japan. The title itself suggests at his main argument that the use of the atomic was necessary as a tool to defeat Japan. This argument will be reiterated many times throughout the book, with much evidence borrowed from other scholars who are on his side in this very popular debate. Miscamble takes much of the book to defend not only the bombings but also Truman’s role in them. By painting him as a passive politician who inherited the decisions that were to be made, the blame on Truman is lessened.

Read More
1085 Words | 5 Pages

Throughout the development of the atomic bomb and World War II, countries were forced to pick sides, and the bomb was seen as either a benefit or a detriment. However, In the book Trinity the author Jonathan Fetter-Vorm maneuvers through this by going into detail about the making and reasoning behind the production of the atomic bomb. He shows the effects and aftermath of the bomb and helps clarify some aspects of this war-stopping development. Directly targeting civilians was not a common move in previous wars. This, combined with the worldwide unease about the war are all discussed to create an understanding of why the United States made these major decisions.

Read More
780 Words | 4 Pages

Leahy's perspective raises important questions about the necessity and morality of using such destructive weapons. In conclusion, the decision by President Harry S. Truman to drop the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki at the end of World War II remains a topic of intense debate and controversy. While some argue that the use of atomic weapons was necessary to end the war quickly and save lives, others believe that the bombings were unnecessary and morally

Read More
676 Words | 3 Pages

Was America right to use atomic weapons against Japan? The dropping of the atomic bomb in Japan at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, was the end of WWII. However, there has been much conflict considering the use of the bomb. In this essay, I will discuss reasons from both sides of the argument and justify my opinion.

Read More
574 Words | 3 Pages

WWII was a significant event in the U.S. history, and killed many people with new inventions and a numerous amount of weapons. This event was one of the most important factors in Japan’s surrender and America’s victory. In my opinion, I think that the atomic bomb should have been dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan, for many reasons. In this paper, I will share how Japan made the U.S. enter the war, how the loss of Americans increased, and how the U.S. was not the only one trying to make the bomb. The first reason that I think that the atomic bomb should have been dropped was that Japan made the U.S. enter the war and start fighting.

Read More
1723 Words | 7 Pages

In the sixty years since World War 2, President Truman 's decision to drop the atomic bombs on Japan has been questioned by many people. The bombing caused many deaths but also clearly marked the end of the long drawn-out war. The justifications for the bombing are still however a widely discussed debate. Arguments supporting the justification of the bombing involve the President 's stern belief that the Japanese had brought it on themselves, and that the bombing would end the war and save many American lives. The counter-arguments were that the Japanese were already defeated and so ‘why was it necessary to drop the bomb?”.

Read More
239 Words | 1 Pages

On 6 August 1945, the first ever atomic bomb to be dropped on foreign soil was released from Enola Gay on Hiroshima in Japan. The nuclear bomb ‘Little Boy’ was dropped as a disastrous attack in an attempt to make the Japanese surrender to America, and destroyed Hiroshima where over 70,000 people were killed instantaneously. When the Emperor of Japan refused to acquire the United States' (U.S./USA) terms of surrender, the U.S. Dropped their second atomic bomb, 'Fat Man' over Nagasaki on August 9th, 1945. Many people despise the use of the atomic bombs, including myself, as the mass murder of civilians is a cruel, uncalled for, sadistic act. The point of this investigation is to determine whether America's decision to drop the Atomic Bombs

Read More
3183 Words | 13 Pages

The decision to use nuclear bombs at the end of World War II was a watershed moment in history that continues to inspire discussion and study. It marks a watershed moment in history, reshaping the world order and ushering in a new age defined by the great destructive force of atomic bombs. A thorough review of primary and secondary sources is required to appreciate the complexity and significance of this judgment. Official pronouncements, correspondence, and firsthand recollections are examples of primary sources, whereas secondary sources give greater historical context and scholarly interpretation. This essay examines a variety of primary and secondary sources to get a comprehensive grasp of the reasons, controversies, and repercussions

Read More
1111 Words | 5 Pages

Atomic weaponry was a foreign concept to the world in the 1940s, and when the USA unleashed its destructive power upon Japan in 1945, many questions arose about the moral connotations this bomb posed. It’s estimated that the atomic bomb saved 30 million lives Japanese and Allied alike by ending the continued fighting. However, in its wake, 200,000 deaths were caused by the impact at Hiroshima, with many more to follow via its lingering effects. Amid the devastation of WW2, the atomic bomb was seen as one of the few decisions left to end the destruction, despite this, the ethics of it are even now still under fire. Was the terror the bomb brought with it worth the victory or if it should have never been developed?

Read More
628 Words | 3 Pages

The use of the atomic bomb by the United States in 1945 was necessary to end the war quickly as well as save more lives than it took. My reasoning for the atomic bomb use being justified is it ended the war quick, Japan attacked Pearl Harbor, and it caused many deaths but saved more people in the long run. President Harry Truman made a justified decision to drop the atomic bomb considering the context

Read More
346 Words | 2 Pages

Atomic Bomb “The atom bomb was no great decision. It was merely another powerful weapon in the arsenal of righteousness”. This quote by Harry S. Truman is relevant to the fact that the U.S. did the right thing by dropping the atomic bomb. It was payback for Pearl Harbor. The war would have continued on for a long time.

Read More
596 Words | 3 Pages

Issue 1: The deployment of the atomic bomb in World War II was an unfortunate necessity for the United States. In a total war situation, using nuclear weapons was a solution that made the best of a bad situation. American leaders recognized the opportunity cost in terms of American lives versus the consequences of dropping the bomb. As Maddox writes, the Japanese “meant to fight the war to a finish” (5).

Read More
1840 Words | 8 Pages

the bomb’s code name was “Little Boy”. Three days later, on August 9th, 1945, America dropped another bomb on Nagasaki with the code name “Fat Man”. As many as 200,000 deaths were caused by “Little Boy” alone and many people would die of radiation for years to come. The dropping of the Atom bomb on Hiroshima is an extremely debatable issue with no right or wrong answer. In this essay I will describe both sides to the argument then conclude using my final opinion on whether I am for or against the dropping of the bomb on Hiroshima.

Read More
757 Words | 4 Pages

The cautious awe bombing of civilians, and the annihilation of Hiroshima and Nagasaki had drawn back clear-cut accusation of the atomic bomb as instrument of war, and accept moral legitimacy to the disciplinary use of atomic weapons under positive conditions. This leads to the agreement and policies for the future generations. The harrowed of the atomic era when it comes to values and attitudes were still in a very sensitive stage, the American leaders failed to deliver a fair and absolute no to these new instrument of mass

Read More
800 Words | 4 Pages

The United States´ President Harry S. Truman authorized the launch of the atomic bombs on the cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki, ending with the life of almost 214.000 people, civilians mostly. However, it is analyzed the necessity of those actions starting of the hypothesis of what was right; therefore, a questionable point of view emerges. USA should not have launched atomic bombs because they caused an unnecessary damage, dead people, damage to the environment and diseases to the citizens.

Read More

More about Was The Detonation Of The Nuclear Bomb Justified?

Open Document