ipl-logo

What Are The Arguments Against Darwin's Theory Of Evolution

501 Words3 Pages

According to 98% of AAAS scientists, evolution is a fact, not a theory. Darwin’s theory of evolution is a theory that states that all beings on earth evolved from a single cell that adapted to different climates to survive. It also states that the earth was created, by chance. I believe that the world is awfully complicated to have happened by chance. For that reason, I am against Darwin’s theory of evolution and that we should teach it in schools.
One of my reasons is that evolution is a THEORY which by definition is a supposition. A supposition is an uncertain belief. For example, let’s say I pay the Acme Rainbow Marble Company to create marbles of every color of the rainbow. So I put it to my test group and I tell them to take out one marble each the first one pulls out a green …show more content…

But there are no red marbles. So I call the company and ask “Where are all the red marbles?” they reply by saying “Don't worry they're in there just keep looking,” so we do. We pull out marble after marble but still no red marbles. And I keep calling the marble company and they keep on promising that the red marbles will show up, but they don't. It's kind of like evolution. Scientist keep promising but the missing gaps in the fossil record will show up, but they don't. You could pull out millions of marbles each year for 150 years, and not find a single red marble. This is the same as evolution because millions of fossils have been found each year, and never have we found a partially evolved being. This proves that evolution should not be taught as a fact because there are so many gaps that no

Open Document