What Are The Arguments Against The Separation Of Church And State

The separation of church and state is defined by law as the rule that tax exempt organizations such as church groups, other houses of worship, and their beliefs may not be involved in partisan politics. The endorsement or opposition of a candidate running for a government office is forbidden. Despite that, this law seems to be loosely enforced. The importance of the separation of church and state is crucial in order to maintain a Democratic America. Not only does it enforce a democratic state, but preserves religious freedoms. In the past, when a region or country declared it has one true, official religion, the outcome was negative. To some, America is supposedly on a path towards religious prejudice, specifically towards Christianity and Catholicism. Arguments that support these claims come from vaguely written articles that include tales of businesses refusing to provide their services to homosexual couples and laws being passed that contradict Christian beliefs. Another complaint of many religious folk is the law that homosexual couples are legally allowed to marry. Again, it is unconstitutional to restrict a homosexual couple to marry as it is simply a religious viewpoint. When it comes to businesses refusing to either sell or do something that is against their religious values, it's not an “attack” on their religion. Private

For example, past president John F. Kennedy was one of these aforementioned people. On September 12, 1960, he gave one of the most influential speeches on church and state. He addressed numerous times throughout the speech that religion is to remain only in their private affairs. President Kennedy believed in an absolute and defined separation of the two, in which no religious group imposes its beliefs and will upon the general population or government office. Even past bishops endorsed this