ipl-logo

What Are The Arguments For Gun Control Pros And Cons

540 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Argumentative statement for gun control

Keirstyn Liddle Mod 1
Participation in Government Gun Control

The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution is very often misunderstood. It directly reads “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” This amendment has brought about two theories: the “individual right theory” and the “collective rights theory.” The first says that individuals have a right to own a gun, while the second theory states that only the local, state and federal legislatures have the right. Much controversy has been brought about because of these two theories(Second). It is unclear in the amendment whether individuals have …show more content…

In fact, each state has different laws for gun control. Some states such as New York and South Carolina have prohibited open carry for handguns while other states have zero restrictions for handguns. Anyone can walk around carrying a gun and this is not right. Everyone should not have the right to walk around with a deadly weapon in their back pocket. It simply is not needed. Many states do not even require background checks for private sales. It seems that if a state requires background checks and considers mental illnesses, they have a higher “Gun Control Grade(Kirk).” In all, I believe that the use of guns need to be limited. Specifically in my community, guns do not seem to be a problem. Although just a few cities away in Syracuse there are shootings you hear about everyday with 15 year old kids just because they are trying to have fun. It is ridiculous. We will never be able to keep every single gun and person under control, but if we take more steps into making it our laws in the country more unified, I think the violence rate in the United States will dramatically

Show More
Related
1485 Words | 6 Pages

One of the most debatable issues in the U.S. today is the issue of gun control and how people should go about modernizing the forces surrounding citizens ' power to have and employ firearms. The Second Amendment of the US Constitution ensures that people have the ability to own and carry weapons. Others contend that this provision should be kept in place, despite numerous individuals saying it should be amended or removed. There are several reasons why the Second Amendment should be amended or abolished, according to those who make this argument.

Read More
930 Words | 4 Pages

Strict regulations and limitations have been pursued already and clearly do not suffice. Statics brought to attention by gun control opponents, show that gun control laws have done little to reduce crime rates. Several restrictions have been made on certain guns, considered as overly dangerous, though in the hands of an unstable criminal even a legal hunting gun can be deadly. Countless restrictions have been made, however people have still found ways around them. If people are unstable and determined enough, they will find a gun, regardless of the restrictions or regulations.

Read More
915 Words | 4 Pages

Gun control is what restricts people from buying and using guns, but these laws are not strengthened at the extent they need to be strengthened. This leads to many people getting these guns and using them to cause mass shootings all over the U.S. For example, according to the Council on Foreign Relationship, a news article that covers major world issues, in 2017, mass shootings at a music festival in Las Vegas and at a church near San Antonio have rekindled the gun control debate (“U.S. Gun Policy: Global Comparisons”). The fact that gun control is still not tightened is a huge margin and error, and still causes mass shootings as we just covered. Many people have said that we should not allow guns to be purchased, which would seem like the logical option. However, according to the same source, Council on Foreign Relationship, some states, such as Idaho, Alaska, and Kansas, have passed various laws attempting to nullify

Read More
620 Words | 3 Pages

Gun laws are different in each state. For example in some states, background checks are not mandatory to own a firearm and vice versa. States that do require background checks for all types of guns include California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Nevada, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, and Washington. As stated by Giffords Law Center, they state “Though more than 90% of the American public supports background checks for all gun sales, a dangerous and deadly loophole in federal gun laws still exempts unlicensed sellers from having to perform any background check whatsoever before selling a firearm. With this loophole, guns easily find their way into the hands of illegal buyers and gun traffickers, dramatically increasing the likelihood of gun murders and

Read More
1673 Words | 7 Pages

The precise meaning and purpose of the Second Amendment has been a subject of frequent debate. Gun control advocates argue that when the newly founded country adopted the Second Amendment in 1791, each state maintained a militia composed of ordinary citizens who served as part-time soldiers’’ (‘’Gun Control’’). Even though states aren 't supposed to limit laws of the bill of rights in the past states had their own military groups so states should still have control over their own laws with guns like states did back then when the second amendment was

Read More
1549 Words | 7 Pages

Debates about the Second Amendment have focused on its parameter to protect private rights of individual people to possess firearms, and the ability to be apart of militia organizations. The world has seen a drastic change since the implementation of the amendment in 1791. Civilian ran militias are almost obsolete, and most militias are now ran and regulated by state governments. The military of the United states has also seen a dramatic increase, and is undoubtedly more powerful. For the most part, civilians are no longer expected or desire to be apart of a militia, however firearms are still essential for self defence, hunting, and

Read More
1599 Words | 7 Pages

There is no point to passing more laws on gun control if people do not obey the ones we already have. For example, Pj Cook and Jens Ludwig wrote that ever since the Brady Handgun violence prevention act, the number of homicides and suicides did not really change (A10). If someone is wanting to commit a mass shooting or school shooting, the last thing on their minds are the gun control laws. It would cost the government more money and workers than they have to try to implement them. Implementing mental health screenings in schools would be easier because it is easier to set up and follow up on.

Read More
550 Words | 3 Pages

If a background check does stop a criminal or an irresponsible gun owner from getting a gun, they can easily purchase one illegally, which gun control cannot prevent. Guns are also used by many for self defense. Furthermore, gun control cannot prevent gun related accidents. First and foremost, guns are safe if they are used correctly and responsibly but are made dangerous if the wrong people get them, and it is easy for this to happen when it is so easy to purchase them illegally. One place where illegal purchases are made regularly are gun shows.

Read More
987 Words | 4 Pages

Places like Nevada and West Virginia were it is very country and wide open makes owning guns almost normal. Living in places like Long Beach, California or New York makes owning guns very rare because there is really no use for them recreationally. I honestly feel that having more restrictive

Read More
1991 Words | 8 Pages

The Ethical Debate of Gun Control Introduction The debate of gun control presents an ethical dilemma in deciding which rights afforded by the US Constitution are more important. The ethical debate places the rights afforded in the Second Amendment to bear arms against the rights afforded in the First Amendment to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

Read More
610 Words | 3 Pages

Some states require permits to purchase guns, while others don’t. Some states also restrict the ability of a person to purchase an assault weapon, which has shown to be the weapon of choice for most mass shootings. The law should be the same in each state to facilitate enforcement while protecting the rights of citizens who legally have guns to move unrestricted across state lines. People who purchase guns should also have to go through 100% background checks. Guns should not be given to people who are unstable or could be a possible danger to civilian’s

Read More
359 Words | 2 Pages

Gun control laws should keep guns from going into the wrong hands. However, the United States should not ban guns completely because its ones right to own one. Americans have a tendency to think that owning a gun is a necessary because American society has embedded guns to be part of our culture. Media makes it seem that we must own a gun for our safety. Guns are always displayed on television shows, movies, and video games where masses of people or “monsters” are killed.

Read More
1108 Words | 5 Pages

One of the most controversial issues our nation faces today is gun control laws. This controversy has been created due to the different interpretations of the 2nd Amendment of the Constitution which states the right of citizens to bear arms; “a well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” (Cornell Law School). Anti-gun control laws believe that the amendment guarantees the right to bear any kind of firearms. On the other hand, we have does that believe that more controls laws should be implemented since the 2nd amendment was for the right of States to have an armed militia during wartime. Both sides have strong point, however, the safety of our children comes first, and a firearm means death in the wrong hands.

Read More
702 Words | 3 Pages

If the United States would regulate the amount of guns that one person is allowed to have the gun control issue would decrease, which will also decrease all the violence that takes place. More than one gun is held in every household and that is not counting the amount of guns that a person could have in storage. “Studies have suggested that reduced access to guns would result in less crime” (“Gun Violence in America: The 13 Key Questions”). The amount of guns in The United States is a crucial amount of three hundred and ten million guns. Though guns can be used self-defense that is not the only thing that they are used for with the about of cruel people out in the world.

Read More
1432 Words | 6 Pages

Guns are just a tool, like knives and hammers and it completely depends on the people on how they use it. People who support guns and arms say that the Second Amendment secures individual’s right to carry guns with them and that gun rights is needed for self-protection, and was intended for military to have peace and defend the country if needed (Spitzer, 70). Most of the Americans use guns as a source to protect themselves and they believe that gun ownership prevents crime. A study conducted on November 26, 2013 showed that bans on weapons did not significantly affect murder rates at the state level (Lane, 5). Moreover, even if the rules and regulations are executed on gun control, not all criminals obey the law.

Read More

More about What Are The Arguments For Gun Control Pros And Cons

Related Topics

Open Document