ipl-logo

What Caused The Russian Revolution Essay

812 Words4 Pages

Causes of the Russian Revolution Thomas S
In July 1917, Tsar Nicolas II was assassinated. This started the Russian revolution that industrialized Russia. But what led up to this and why? Nicolas II became ruler in 1894. He was unprepared and untrained as a ruler. As well as this, Alexander III left him with his failed industrialization. At the start of WWI, Nicolas decided to take control of the army, leaving for the front lines. Because of this, many farmers and in land workers lost their food and supplies to the army. Some minor changes of him are the ban of Vodka and the renaming of the capitol city.
Alexandria was the wife of Nicolas II. She is a German peasant and so disliked by the colonists. With the leaving of Nicolas, she was in full …show more content…

‘it is so dull without you’ Another interesting point this brings up, is that it shows how Rasputin managed to get the royal family to believe that he can let God do anything he wants. This shows that Rasputin was able to control the royal family and therefore Russia because of the way he manipulates the family to need him as a friend. An example of this is the phrase ‘I kiss your holy hand’. This phrase shows that to the royal family, Rasputin is of higher rank than them. This may be because of the way they think that the tsar was chosen by god and Rasputin has a strong connection to him.

Another source, talks about the Russians on the front line. It talks about the lack of supplies at the front. The interesting thing it brings up is that the Russian army was underequipped and therefore not prepared for battle. This would be because Russia mobilized quickly giving it no time to prepare carefully and the tsar took over the army without knowledge and skills on that territory. In the country itself, the peasants had to give away everything to the army which will eventually get them to support the government because of hunger and loss of

Show More
Related
727 Words | 3 Pages

Clearly, Revolution broke out on the streets of Petrograd (now St. Petersburg) and Nicholas was forced to abdicate his throne later that month in March 1917. Late on the night of July 16; Nicholas,

Read More
1271 Words | 6 Pages

With no signs of the czar’s attempt to solve the complications, Russia banded together and filled the streets with strikes and riots. A revolution was peaking among the peasants. The uprising brought Nicholas ll no choice but to abdicate his throne. This was an opportunity

Read More
1224 Words | 5 Pages

Furthermore, Nicholas allowed his country to enter two wars, the Russo-Japanese war and WWI, Russia being ill-prepared for the wars both times. The battles did not go well in either of the wars and his actions dealt great suffering to the people of Russia, especially the minority, or lower class. Although his country was in peril and he knew it, he refused to implement reforms. Tsar Nicholas II truly wanted to aid his country although his inexperience did not allow him to do so. Hence, this led to the murder of his family and the end of 3 centuries of Romanov ruling when the Bolsheviks took power of Russia.

Read More
736 Words | 3 Pages

Although Russia was once again in a terrible position for war the fought in the first World War and their country and its people faced further hardships. The people began to revolt and took over the government and then assassinated Nicholas II’s entire

Read More
1052 Words | 5 Pages

Maybe he thought that by copying other successful tsars he could be one too. He much preferred spending time with his wife and children, a devoted ‘family man’, as shown in source 7, a royal portrait. The Russian economy was also declining and crumbling because of factors out of his control such as a series of failed crop seasons, which caused a lack of food sources, leading to inflation. There were also some political factors which may have led to the end of the dynasty, like the faulty legal system, which had no formal court of appeals who could look at and assess the Tsar’s laws. I also find it hard to believe that one person alone could cause such a downfall of a long established line of rulers, after all there were plenty equally, if not more, incompetent Romanov tsars who didn’t cause the collapse of the family.

Read More
152 Words | 1 Pages

Based on the principles of rights ethics, individuals have certain privileged rights and one of them is privacy and protection against invasion of personal rights and property. Individual rights can be moral, legal or ethical in nature and have to be respected by everyone, be it the person next door or the government. Thus, NSA’s interference into the personal lives of U.S citizens and foreign nationals, by collecting data without their knowledge, is nowhere near ethical or moral. If they had to do so based on so called reasons of “national security”, NSA should have disclosed their actions to the public and justified their mode of operation. Overall, national security is important so safeguard the nation, but at the same time, individual

Read More
657 Words | 3 Pages

In this essay, I will go more in depth with Alexander’s other accomplishments throughout his life, including ones from his early life, to later, once he got involved in politics. Early Life In Alexander Hamilton, the author talks

Read More
904 Words | 4 Pages

The Russian people were more than disappointed when Nicholas and his wife attend the balls hours after the horrific deaths pretending that nothing happened. The Russian people believed the new Tsar only cared for his family and for the people in his gilded circle due to his response of the event that occurred. The Russian Ruler History testified that the lack of leadership on Tsar Nicholas II behalf was blamed on Alexander III. Alexander III frequently reused to train and lead Nicholas for the position because Alexander III didn’t believe that Nicholas was ever going to take the throne. Many Russian people had many doubts about the Tsar regime but held much hope that the Tsar was going to lead Russia to greatness.

Read More
462 Words | 2 Pages

Although many will argue that Lenin’s good leadership, that led to his exile, was the reason the Russian Revolution started, Nicholas II made so many crucial mistakes that outweigh the decisions of Lenin. Having more of a positive impact, “Lenin began skillfully growing his power within the Bolsheviks. He was so successful in doing this that the government grew afraid of him, and he was exiled two years later” (“The”). The passage shows that Lenin did more good than bad, and on the other hand Nicholas II was never headed in a good

Read More
580 Words | 3 Pages

Nicholas II was a bad leader because troubles started almost as soon as he became a leader. There was the revolution of 1905 where there were strikes and revolts. He also promised freedoms like when he started the duma, but then the duma was shortly dissolved because just like Louis, Nichols did not want to listen to anyone else because he was leader, and that led to issues with the government. These similar actions of being selfish and absolute leaders make Louis XIV and Nicholas II bad leaders because when these leaders only had their interest in mind and did not take the country into

Read More
1440 Words | 6 Pages

His successor, Alexander III, made czarist control more strict over the country. He encouraged industrialization to expand Russia's power. Nationalism was a major force behind the drive for industrial expansion. Alexander II died because of his reforms, that was the main consequence he

Read More
1235 Words | 5 Pages

Czar forced Russia to grow industrially overstraining the workers. With the development of industrialization, there was an increase in taxes, land payments, and an increase in population. This caused workers to flee to the countryside to find work because the cities were flooded with mass loads of people and all jobs were quickly swallowed. “The number of workers rose to 1179000 in 1879 and in 1900 amounted to 2208000- tripling the amount of workers” (McGuinness, n.d., p.3). With abandonments and rebellion at the front, Nicholas decided to travel to the front to inspire the troops.

Read More
251 Words | 2 Pages

The author gives a lot of good arguments regarding his position of the Russian Revolution. Figes first shows that, whatever the hypotheses of counterfactual history might be, practically speaking the tsarist framework was bound by its defects. The disappointment of the 1905 Revolution did not pick up tsarism much time, and regardless Nicholas II attacked his most able pastor, Stolypin; and even his reforms; also how the 1914 war might at first have put off such an upheaval, yet from there it quickened it. The thought that tsarist Russia was making a course for a thriving liberal free enterprise, and was redirected just by the war, is a dream as the author well mentions. The author also, has made a critical contribution to our comprehension

Read More
1360 Words | 6 Pages

The most important causes of the Democratic Revolution of the 1770s and 1810s were the economic and social causes because taxation wasn’t equal and people who were in the bottom classes were treated unfairly. One reason that economics was one of the most important causes of the Democratic Revolutions was because taxation was unequal. Before the French Revolution, the French society was split into three groups called estates. The first estate was the church which made up 1% of the French population. They owned 10-15% of the land.

Read More
921 Words | 4 Pages

The Outbreak of Revolution "I have a dream" is one of the most influential sentences in history, said by Martin Luther King, the famous revolutionary who called for justice and equality. Revolution is a historical process and the main reason for a new world appearing. Politically, revolution means changing or overthrowing the old regime to make a complete change in society and fundamental institutions. In other words, changing the current oppressive system to a new, fair, and impartial political system to provide all rights, freedom, and renaissance society. However, revolution sometimes has a negative effects on the country and the citizens.

Read More

More about What Caused The Russian Revolution Essay

Related Topics

Open Document