Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis of alexander the great
Analysis of alexander the great
Analysis of alexander the great
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis of alexander the great
Analysis of alexander the great
Analysis of alexander the great
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analysis of alexander the great
Alexander the Great was born in 356 BCE. He was born into royalty. A hired philosopher (Aristotle) taught Alexander about academic subjects, politics, sports, and warfare. Alexander the Great also made the Macedonian army into a deadly fighting machine. Alexander was not great for these reasons, his disrespect to others, how hungry he was for power, and his fearfulness of the world and people in it.
His parents hired the philosopher Aristotle to educate Alexander in subjects such as politics, sports, and warfare. He grew a strong opinion of himself as the outcome of his education. He then concluded to the belief that he was a god. When Alexander’s father died, he inherited his army and his quest to conquer Persia. He successfully lead the army through the Persian Empire and conquered thousands of square miles
GET KNOW WHO THE REAL ALEXANDER HAMILTON IS AND HOW HE HAS RISEN FROM PIT IN THE BRITSISH WEST INDIES TO BECOME A FOUNDING FATHER IN THE UNITED STATES Alexander led a colorful political career in the United States after leaving his home in the British West Indies. He helped shape the country’s economic policies when the US Constitution was signed. This led to him being featured in the $10 bill.
Alexander basically was around in the 300’s BC, kind of contrary to popular belief. He, for the most part, ruled after his father, Philip II passed away, which for the most part is quite significant. Alexander basically was known as Alexander the pretty great because of all the land he conquered in a subtle way. Alexander really stretched his empire so for all intents and purposes large and he spread the Greek language and culture wherever he went, which particularly is quite significant. Alexander passed away at 33 from an unknown illness, which actually is fairly significant.
Ten days after he developed a sickness, Alexander died without leaving an heir to the throne. This caused an argument among his generals to fight over who would get what portion of the land (Background Essay). However, according to the chart titled “Alexander’s Legacy,” the fighting and poor leadership among them caused the empire to crumble a short ten years following Alexander’s death (Document E). Alexander’s empire, which was two million square miles at the time of his death (almost the size of the Roman empire), fell apart because of Alexander’s poor planning and lack of political finesse (Document E). This shows that Alexander had little skill as a political leader, which kept his empire on the brink of falling at any moment.
The impact he left emotionally on the people was very important. “He conquered the world and was a very great man, brave and dauntless and was generous to his followers.” (Document F). The evidence presented shows the character of Alexander. We can see the impact he left on the people.
When the ship had meet the shore he had gone up to Princeton college and had tried to ask if he could graduate in 2 years because he wanted to do what Aaron Burr did and join the war and help. Well that didn’t go as plan when he had ended up punching the bursar of Princeton. After that mishap he went off to find Aaron Burr in the streets of New York and ended up finding him and telling him what had happened at Princeton. Finding out that Burr could not help him get into Princeton he found confusion in advice Burr had. Burr had said just wait and see and be patient but if had known Alexander would have known he would only follow that once in his life and both had got their own form of torture from that advice.
2. What are some of the major issues that Alexander the Great faced when he ascended the throne after his father 's death? How did Alexander handle these issues? Some of the issues Alexander the Great faced when he became a king, was some of the Greek cities did not want him as king and decide to doubt him. He proofed them wrong by setting a harsh example for them, he attacked the accent city of Thebes and then sold more than twenty thousand Thebans to slavery and killed six thousand of them.
Based on this quote, it shows that Alexander’s early life wasn’t the best. This is shown by the fact his dad left, and he had to get a job, most likely to help out his family with money. Later in the article, the author writes,” In 1774-1775 he wrote three influential pamphlets, which upheld the agreements of the Continental Congress on the nonimportation, nonconsumption, and nonimportation” (DeConde). The author says this because it shows that even early on in his life, he was trying to prove himself. It is clear that Alexander knew he had a hard life, and he wanted to improve how life was going to be in the future of the United States.
After his early death at the age of 33, Alexander left behind a vast empire stretching from Greece to northwestern India. In addition to his empire, however, Alexander also left a lasting impression on the world as a military leader and king. Even today Alexander remains a respected historical character, considering that his military strategies are still used in modern warfare. This paper thus attempts to answer the question what lasting impacts Alexander the Great had on future generations. In doing so this paper will examine three aspects of Alexander the Great: his personality, his military skills and, lastly, the resulting cultural impact of his conquests.
Alexander, who watched closely, said, “What an excellent horse do they lose for want of address and boldness to manage him!”, This is only the first example of Alexander’s ingenuity.
I focus on the challenge that his father Phillip left him. "Philip and his friends looked on at first in silence and anxiety for the result, till seeing him turn at the end of his career, and come back rejoicing and triumphing for what he had performed, they all burst out into acclamations of applause; and his father shedding tears, it is said, for joy, kissed him as he came down from his horse, and in his transport said, 'O my son, look thee out a kingdom equal to and worthy of thyself, for Macedonia is too little for thee' " (Alex. 6.8.). He was lead to believe that the cause of His life was to be the greatest leader and conqueror of all time. Alexander the Great's legacy is both far reaching and profound.
A special and unique relationship does not have to be between two groups of people that share everything in common but can be between two completely different groups of people. Alexander the Great brought this type of unity and bond between the Greeks and Jews because of his campaign to Persia. His campaign did not only bring another vast group of people under his reign, but also allowed for one of the most unique relationships to be formed. In the end however, cultural differences and Hellenistic views separated the two. Alexander traveled to Tyre and Egypt during his visit to Persia.
Alexander’s courageous attitude on the topic of military conquests assured him victory in almost every situation. No matter how stacked the odds were against him, Alexander the Great pulls through. We have seen his courage prevail throughout all his life: calming an unstable horse when he was young, moving his entire army across the Hellespont, and leading a powerful army across a surging river, all the while wearing an obvious white plume. Although some may disagree, Alexander’s style of commanding was not recklessness but a calculated risk of his life in the cause of a greater goal. He knew his men would follow him, because he had, overtime, created a bond between leader and soldier.
“One World” is an article that appeared in The Economist, a British newspaper, that analyzed globalization and its effects on the world (“One World” 378). “Setting RIght a Dangerous World” was written in 2002 by John Lewis Gaddis, and it analyzes the effects of the 9/11 attacks and suggests a different direction in America’s international relations (Gaddis 385). The world at the end of the Cold War seems to be somewhat unsure of its future. For example, “One World” acknowledges the occurrence of globalization, but expresses uncertainty about its extent and effects. Technology today is advancing at such a rapid pace that no one knows what its long-term effects and progression will be.