More handpicked essays just for you.
why was the north victorious in the civil war
Economic factors in the civil war
Economic factors in the civil war
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: why was the north victorious in the civil war
An abundant amount of predominant individuals, from both the Union and the Confederacy, contributed to the outcome of the Civil War from 1861 to 1865. Presidents, military leaders, soldiers, and civilians all played a vital role in this perilous war. For instance, page 500 of our American Nation textbook states, “For both the North and South, the war affected every area of life.” The Union was victorious on April 9, 1865 when Confederate General, Robert E. Lee and his army surrendered at Appomattox Court House in Virginia. Although this is true, the result of the Civil War could have been entirely altered with different leaders.
The Great Victory of the North During the deathly 4 years of the Civil War, there were a total of 620,000 deaths for the purpose of bringing the country back together and end slavery. The North has gained their glorious victory by being the owner of things like strong transportation system, large population, and stable resources. When the war began, the differences in resources from both sides are clearly noticed. Even though the South was well known for its massive cotton farming, but most of the cotton got sent to the North, waiting, to be turned into clothes and goods before export to different places.
The Logistical sustainment of its large Army while moving was essential in the outcome of the Civil War. Without this logistical superiority, the Union would not have been able to drive so deep into the Southern States. IV. The Confederacy was unable to compete economically with its Northern foe even though it tried to generate wealth through the same methods of taxation and bond sales. a. The reluctance to tax land and slaves or direct its member states to collect taxes while not regulating currency, resulted in hyper-inflation and counterfeiting and a reluctance of lenders to want to do business.
Previous tactics the Union used resulted in bloody combat with numerous casualties, so they decided to go along with setting up a blockade. To accomplish this, the Union army started seizing cities near the Mississippi River to start cutting the Confederacy into two. One such victory was lead by Ulysses S. Grant, who took control of Vicksburg on July 4th 1863. Another important victory took place as "General William Tecumseh Sherman led his army on a rampage through the south during his march to the sea in 1864 depriving the south of vital food and materials as he and his men destroyed or captured anything that stood in their way." *** These two victories enabled the Union to have the upper hand.
While the union armed force was much bigger their absence of combat zone experience added to the misfortune which likewise addresses General Grant's lack of common sense. The one blessed result of this fight is that it brought about an increment in hostile to war conclusion in the north and an abatement of General Grant's prevalence. The union eventually won the war. This fight made me make inquiries yet two of them stick out to me the most, How did the consistent contrast of Union to Confederate assets not play that enormous of a part in the fight? furthermore If this fight occurred before in the overland crusade would it have influenced the
The Union navy caused the Confederacy’s defeat. In comparison of Civil War ships, the size of Civil War navies, and the role Civil War navies played in the war. The navies of the Civil War used a variety of ships. The Confederacy began the war with few ships. Instead of building new wooden warships, the Confederacy invested their money in new kind of ships, ironclads.
The advantage for the Union was that they had more men and more resources. The Confederate Army also had resources but not as many. The Union army had 87,000 men fighting in this battle and in the Confederate Army there was 45,000 men fighting. Giving a huge advantage to the North. The weapons used were guns, swords, and canons.
The North had many advantages over the South the helped them win the civil war. These reasons included a central leadership, more resources, and recruiting black men for their armies. These reasons helped the North win the civil war and play a big part in how successful they would be. With having advantages, better tactics when fighting, and also a higher population, the North would use strategic planning to fight the South and ultimately win the civil war.
The Confederates attack also helped the North to commit to the war. The North’s Union Army has several advantages over the South’s Confederate
Why The Confederacy Lost the War Confederate General Robert E. Lee in his farewell speech to the Confederate troops at Appomattox, Virginia in April 1865 summarized why the Confederacy lost when he stated “The Army of Northern Virginia has been compelled to yield to overwhelming numbers and resources” (Lee, Robert E. Orders No. 9 –Lee’s Final Order to the Army of Northern Virginia,” Appomattox Court House, Virginia, April 10, 1865 in Boritt, page 19). The Union simply had more manpower with a population of 22 million versus the Confederacy’s 10 million. Additionally, the North could just out-produce the South with the North’s more abundant and productive industry by a factor of more than three to one. (David Donald, below, page 21).
The Union came out with more soldiers left in their army still which meant that this was another reason for the turning point. The Union already had around 5,000,000 more men that were military aged men than the Confederates in the first place and now they have more actual soldiers left. That had to cause
Chapter 21 Questions 1. The North won the Civil War because they were much better off than the South. They had a lot of great resources; they had more money and more people. The South did not have any of these resources. The one thing that they had to rely on was their cotton.
One, in particular, would be the North’s abundance of soldiers. Edwin C. Bearss claims, “The South lost the Civil War because of a number of factors. It was inherently weaker in the various essentials to win a military victory in the North. The north had a population of more than twenty-two million people to the South’s nine and a half million of whom four and a half million were slaves”. With the North having more people to go to war with, it was clear their army would be able to defeat the South.
After four long years, the Unions won the war which saw to it that both parties ended up as a united nation once again. The North overpowered and defeated the South due to a number of reasons as illustrate below. To begin with, the fact that the South majored in agriculture made them to be left behind in terms of industrialization, an important factor during the civil war since fabricated merchandise was highly regarded than agricultural products. The North was therefore privileged to be in a better position in production of armory since it was able to host firms that manufactured ammunitions and war locomotives. The South was poorer, since cotton was no longer making ready income and they only had a few manufacturing origins.
