ipl-logo

Why Did The Soviet Union Collapse

650 Words3 Pages

At one point considered a great empire, the Soviet Union is also known for its great collapse. There are many arguments and viewpoints on why the Soviet Union collapsed; however, by looking closely at the history and laws of the Soviet Union it is clear why it collapsed. The Soviet Union collapsed for two reasons: a failed economy and a unfavorable geography. The failing economy of the Soviet Union was a major contributor to the collapse of the Soviet Union as a whole. Much of the failure economically comes from the failure of central planning. According to 1977 constitution of the USSR in the Soviet Union, socialism was to reign supreme and the economy was to be planned by the central Soviet government. “ The Soviet state is organized and functions on the principle of democratic centralism, namely the electiveness of all bodies of state authority from the lowest to the highest, their accountability to the people, and the obligation of lower bodies to observe the decisions of higher ones. Democratic centralism combines central leadership with local initiative and creative activity …show more content…

The Soviet Union was territorially vast, stretching down as far as central Asia and Eastern Europe. With a territory so vast, it is incredibly hard to manage and dictate from Moscow. The Soviet Union was simply too large for influence of a centrally planned state to make its way everywhere (Suny 1998). In addition, the Soviet Union contained various different ethnic groups, religions, and languages that made unification much less likely. According to the USSR constitution of 1977 territories of the Soviet Union did maintain the right to succeed. Thus ultimately leading to mass succession into various independent states weakening and then ultimately ending the Soviet Union. The inability to geographically and nationalistically unite the Soviet Union was a major contributor to its

Show More
Related
296 Words | 2 Pages

According to him, the Union has to keep their pace, or they would be defeated. (Document 1) This was a positive part of Stalin's rule. This made the people proud of their country and made them want to come together and grow stronger. Stalin provided the

Read More
774 Words | 4 Pages

From 1928, when the plan started, to 1932 to its end, many factories, dams, power stations and even cities were being built. Despite there being harsh penalties implemented to workers for failure to meet their targets, there was still a significant increase in Russia’s industrial growth in a very short period of time. Just like the emancipation of the serfs in 1861, under Tsar Alexander II, in protest of Stalin’s policies, the peasants, in protest, refused to work harder than they needed too, causing them to destroy livestock and crops, which eventually lead to their unnecessary death. Stalin, just like the Tsarist autocratic regime, was not committed to collectivism but preferred capitalism in his ruling of the Soviet Union. This caused a lot of rebellion from the Kulaks who opposed collectivism.

Read More
861 Words | 4 Pages

Many economic factors led to the collapse of the Russian empire. Those factors not only affected the empire, they also affected the people inside of the empire. By examining these factors, we can find out how they led to the fall of Russia. The collapse of the Russian Empire was primarily caused by a combination of weak industrialization, agricultural inefficiencies, and the economic strain of funding World War I. These factors, among others, contributed to the downfall of the empire.

Read More
154 Words | 1 Pages

The Bolshevik Revolution as well as the Russian Civil War had established the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR). The USSR is a communist state, and Western republics and capitalists feared the

Read More
560 Words | 3 Pages

Did the Constitution create a “more perfect Union?” After the American Revolution and The Declaration of Independence, America’s established its core government with the document known as the Articles of Confederation. The Articles possessed many structural weaknesses, mostly because it allowed states to operate like independent countries. The Articles of Confederation set up a government that consisted of a one-house body of delegates in which each state having a single vote. Acting collectively, these delegates could make decisions on certain issues that affected all the states.

Read More
305 Words | 2 Pages

Caroline Foley AP World History Mr. Jameson May 24, 2024 The Soviet Union When an American hears about the Soviet Union the first thought is Joseph Stalin, communism, totalitarianism, and so forth. The Soviet Union was established as a result of the Russian Revolution. This revolution, led by Vladimir Lenin, introduced ideas of Leninism, Marxism, and overall communist ideas that the Soviet Union has become infamous for. Then after the establishment of the Soviet Union, Joseph Stalin came into power.

Read More
287 Words | 2 Pages

For example, the central government, also known as Congress, was too weak. It did not have enough power. All the regulatory power was given to the states, and the states rarely complied with Congressional acts. Another downfall was that because there were so many various currencies and state

Read More
439 Words | 2 Pages

Having a weak central government created a whole new set of problems. After analyzing the Articles of Confederation the weaknesses outnumbered the strengths. Such as states not having to obey the laws and ignore taxations because they had no authority to enforce them. Congress did not have the power to collect taxes from the each of the states, that was one major weakness especially during the Revolutionary War because instead of getting the money they had to ask the states for money and the states said no. At that point the government should have put their foot down and enforced a new law, their troops were fighting for their freedom and these people didn’t care.

Read More
182 Words | 1 Pages

The Soviet Union was a communist country, their government controls the resource and production. The Government decides where people work and live. The war started in Europe after World War II. The soviet Union won control of Eastern Europe; Half of germany and half of its capital, Berlin. The other countries such as the United states, France and Britain controlled the west

Read More
352 Words | 2 Pages

The historical significance of this event is mainly embodied in the collapse of the Soviet Union twelve years after the invasion. The war put immense stresses on the faulty, centralized economic system of the nation, and along with the radical social reforms set by Mikhail Gorbachev, led to the collapse of the nation. This war would be known as the equivalent to the Vietnam War for the United States, both in economic stresses brought upon by the war, and by the social discontent that it caused. Moreover, it had become a source of embarrassment for the Soviet Union; their army no longer seemed invincible to the rest of the world. In addition to this, the Soviets also came under increasing international pressure.

Read More
710 Words | 3 Pages

A negative to this is that the states could not work together with other nations as a whole. This left the United States without any sort of

Read More
3125 Words | 13 Pages

6. There were some causes to why the United States and the Soviet Union ended up becoming rivals, instead of allies. First off, the United States had some negative feelings towards Joseph Stalin's decisions, he had the role of the dictator in Russia. The Americans had these feelings because he had made the decision to sign a pact with Germany in the year 1939. It was a nonaggression pact.

Read More
459 Words | 2 Pages

While the situation was bad, and the Union was stagnating, it was balancing itself out between capitalistic policies to increase the standard of living and socialist policies to pursue capitalism. The system was damaged, but it might have still limped into the 21st century if not for Mikhail Gorbachev, who brought on the collapse of the CPSU. After Gorbachev took power in 1985, he began a series of political and economic reforms designed to tackle the problems piled on over the years. He had realized that past reforms, namely Khrushchev’s Thaw, had failed primarily because conservative elements were in majority within the Supreme Soviet and Central Committee due to the fact that members had to be approved by the CPSU, thus allowing conservative

Read More
1308 Words | 6 Pages

The failures of the wars Russia took part in damaged their economy even more than it already was. The extreme poverty of the Russian people and the overpopulation of the major cities making living condition dreadful. These factors put struggles on the Russian people and it made them very anger at the government. The Tsar, Nicholas II failures to lead the country properly and the consent bad decisions that was made caused outrage with the Russian people. All of these factors are the reason why the Russian Revolution in February 1917

Read More
1090 Words | 5 Pages

This was the start of a trend that led to the fracturing of Wilsonian norms and led to the development of self-determination norms as we recognise them today. The next stage in the development of self-determination came following World War II with the support of the Soviet Union, despite the principle getting only a limited mention in Articles 1 and 55 of the United Nations Charter. Soviet support: the changing of the Norm Lenin was supportive of the principle of self-determination and criticized the imperialistic ways of countries like Britain, France, Spain and Portugal, with special reference to their overseas colonies. This stance presented an interesting contradiction in the form of the Baltic Republics, who had the right to secede from the Soviet Republic written into their Constitution, and then had this very right suppressed by the Soviets.

Read More

More about Why Did The Soviet Union Collapse

Related Topics

Open Document