ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Human Cloning

414 Words2 Pages

There are a couple different kinds of cloning, one more widely accepted than the other. Cloning is a controversial topic no matter how you look at it. Even though one type of cloning is generally wrong, there is still controversy that should not exist. All cloning is morally wrong because God is the perfect creator. The Greek word, klon, literally means “twig” or “offshoot”(Cloning). One type of cloning is human or reproductive cloning which is the creation of a genetically identical human, human cell or human tissue. The other type of cloning is called therapeutic cloning which is the development of stem cells from human embryos that could be used to treat a wide range of diseases. Many people claim to have cloned a human, but no evidence …show more content…

The motive is to cure and help people with diseases by recreating cells or tissues, but they are using stem cells to do this. The motive for human cloning, however, is not good(Cloning). Humans are trying to rebuild the Tower of Babel. They are trying to reach God, be as good as Him, or create life as perfectly as Him which is not moral. “Those who believe an embryo isn’t a human person see no problem in cloning embryos and taking their stem cells even though doing so kills them.” The outcome of trying to help cure a disease is millions of dead people. Is it worth it? The outcome of human cloning gives people too much power; they can regulate who is in the world and pretty soon, things like what characteristics they possess. I believe that medicine is a gift from God that we can use to try to save people and I think the means of therapeutic cloning are good, but we shouldn’t commit an immoral act like taking someone’s life to try to save another. Cloning is just trying to take God’s place, claiming His perfection as ours. He is the perfect author and creator of this story and we can’t just slap Him in the face by pretending to be Him, when we don’t come close to measuring

Show More
Related
1048 Words | 5 Pages

While, cloning is taking the same DNA and replicating it to make an identical copy of that same DNA. Although many people may think genetic enhancement and cloning is a dangerous idea and corrodes the prevailing moral order because it goes against religious beliefs, the advancements may go too far, and there are risk factors. Genetic enhancement and cloning is a good impact on society because it helps food supply, cures inherited diseases, solves infertility, and there is a potential to live longer. Imagine a world without diseases, infertility, and bad genes, that is what genetic enhancement

Read More
476 Words | 2 Pages

“Some cells mutate and cause tumors in patients.” Cells motify can form malignancy. Because you need to take cells to clone someone, it causes unusual growth of tissues which leads to a tumor. If cloning causes tumors that are much worse, than cloning should not even be allowed. When a loved one passes away it is not the best thing that can happen to anybody but cloning that person so that they can be here again will not ever be the same as if they were here alive.

Read More
703 Words | 3 Pages

Creating clones for the sole purpose of infecting them with diseases so that medicine can advance quicker is a common theoretical use for human clones, along with creating them for organ or limb transplants (Aurelia, 2011). With the purpose of creating a clone to be to serve another person, this takes away consent of

Read More
1325 Words | 6 Pages

Many believe cloning is a perversion of science, and some are even concerned with a real life Frankenstein situation: “Reproductive cloning… could lead to a Dr. Frankenstein’s vision of lab manufactured humans. To me this is a perversion of science” (Ford 1). Furthermore, in Frankenstein, Dr. Frankenstein detached from the world as he became obsessed with his studies, diminishing his health. A similar thing could happen to scientists who clone if they decide that they are “playing god,” which can be dangerous for the scientists and the clones. Cloning is so controversial and causes an overbearing amount of stress for it to be befitting to the human mind, as Victor Frankenstein puts it, “If the study to which you apply yourself has a tendency to weaken your affections, and to destroy… those simple pleasures in which no alloy can possibly mix, then that study is certainly unlawful… not befitting of the human minds” (Shelley 50).

Read More
1669 Words | 7 Pages

Take this into consideration and acknowledge how it could impact humanity, as well as the cloned human. The advancing technology allows individuals to have the freedom of bringing their prescience about cloning humans into a reality, faster than one could imagine. One mistake could entirely deteriorate humankind more than benefit it. In today’s quickly-advancing technological age, human cloning is possible; however, it is unethical because it diminishes individuality, interferes with nature, and increases the risk of fatal failures.

Read More
505 Words | 3 Pages

Within this potential of stem cells, they have a capability to copy a cell giving the ability to create a new source of life. Transplantation of organs created from stem cells could eliminate the need for human organ donors in which during a transplant the patient can be treated by doctors to reduce the blood diseases in them. “Embryonic stem cell research is banned due to the consideration that it is a cloning of human life and that we do not currently have a complete understanding of them.” This may be believed by much of the people against this research but it is a way to get a better opportunity to comprehend its

Read More
389 Words | 2 Pages

I believe human cloning interferes with nature in ways humanity will not be able to handle. This source states, " This could lead to a set of problems that we have no ability to handle. " The evidence suggests that human cloning can lead to the fall of humanity, due to clones becoming soverienty. However, some people believe that human cloning can be useful, due to assisting with unlawful interests. I beleive that this will only create misuse of knowledge in trying to correct clones in right paths.

Read More
1246 Words | 5 Pages

For starters, some view cloning as being “based upon liberal ideal of the exercise of free will and rational choice” meaning people should be able to acquire access to cloning methods if they desire (Magney). This would result in the cloning procedure to continue regardless of those opposed to the decision. If the cloning process is accepted, then those who support the decision will have permission to clone anything of their choice. Regardless of cloning being a liberal ideal, those supporting the process would have two restrictions involved in containing access to cloning, as long as it does not involve “injurious to others, or damages the fabric of society” (Magney). However, the proponents believe that the process is morally correct if the individual provides confirmation since the cloning’s benefits overpower the disadvantages.

Read More
1021 Words | 5 Pages

Cloning is an idea that has been around for 100s of years, and has been envisioned in many different forms. Cloning is the production of a genetically identical cells, tissue or whole organisms. In 1996 the first mammal dolly the sheep call created by somatic cell nuclear transfer, proving that it is possible to clone whole organisms. Scientists would choose an individual with traits they deemed desirable. This can range from being an award winning show horse to someone's beloved pets.

Read More
1596 Words | 7 Pages

There has always been a misconception of what it means to clone. The general idea is that cloning is making a precise copy of the cloned subject; however, that is misleading. Cloning organisms does not work completely like the copy machine making copies, but more like breeding animals where two desired breeds are being bred to produce a new offspring where it grows into something that is somewhat similar to the expected outcome. To further understand cloning, the difference between therapeutic and reproductive cloning must be recognized. As Susan Aldridge illustrates in her article “Human Cloning”, therapeutic cloning is the creation of an embryo which will later develop into tissues and cells for the purpose of research.

Read More
943 Words | 4 Pages

Cloning is a very interesting and debatable topic. It can be very controversial since religion and moral issues are against this practice. On the other hand, science sees it as a huge advance. The food industry think of cloning as an opportunity to produce more and faster. Cloning is not as new as some people may think.

Read More
528 Words | 3 Pages

Our argument is that we should support cloning of animals and endangered species. In my partner 's constructive speech, it brought up the fact that cloning animal models of diseases is very beneficial because then scientists can research about these diseases to make a treatment for it. Rather than using all this time for an animal to carry these diseases, in which that animal experiment may be unsuccessful. Therefore needing more time for another animal to carry that disease, which may take a very long time. Making cloning animals for diseases and making treatments for them effective.

Read More
1084 Words | 5 Pages

Cloning at the gene level is acceptable and is done extensively in research areas. However, therapeutic cloning and reproductive cloning raises skepticism and debate both in the general society and the scientific community. Among the argument raised is the possibility of cloning human beings; whether the individuals derived are seen as a complete human with the whole set of human rights attached to them. Body >>> Scientific Advantage <<< 2 PAR Fiester (2005) states that most of the animal cloning projects are driven by the goal of meeting human needs such as treatment of diseases, food production, and entertainment. However, there are animal cloning projects aimed at conserving endangered or

Read More
1614 Words | 7 Pages

Not only are there many ways in which human cloning can be misused, such as, creating clones for organ donors or replacement children, but cloning has also proved to be rather dangerous (Hoskins). It takes scientists many attempts and many failures before they successfully clone animals and there is no reason to think it would be different with humans (Harrison). Many human embryos would need to be sacrificed in order to protect this practice and many of these children clones who did survive would

Read More
988 Words | 4 Pages

Many scientists are trying to clone humans but is it ever justified? There are a whole lot of debates on this topic, and I am strongly against it. Human cloning is ethically wrong; there are many risks involved, which will lead to detrimental effects on human society. Before going into my points, I would like to talk about what cloning is. According to the National Human Genome Research Institute, cloning is “a number of different processes that can be used to produce genetically identical copies of a biological entity.”

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Human Cloning

Related Topics

Open Document