ipl-logo

Why Is Edward Snowden Unethical

730 Words3 Pages

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America. Edward Snowden is a true American hero and President Obama should give him a pardon because his reasons for leaking N.S.A files are understandable because the N.S.A has been breaking laws that our country is founded upon. It’s the federal government duty to ensure American citizens have protection from other countries, but does the government ensure protection to American citizen when their violating our rights. Edward Snowden didn’t violate any laws; instead he gave Americans a clear insight on what the American government was doing.

Edward Snowden leaked over a thousand …show more content…

When Obama was asked if he was going to pardon Snowden, President Obama stated, “I can 't pardon somebody who hasn 't gone before a court and presented themselves, so that 's not something that I would comment on at this point.” In Edward Snowden’s defense, why would he try to go in front of a court where he wouldn’t be given the right of freedom of speech because under that Espionage Act he can’t explain his actions? Another reason why President Obama should give him a pardon is because he’s being charged for crimes he didn’t commit with the Espionage Act. He didn’t sell the information for a large sum of money or give it to enemies, and lastly, he worked at the direction of a foreign government so why is the United States charging him. No one sees the sacrifice Snowden made because he’s giving up more than just information he’s giving up his life for the rights of American

Show More
Related
529 Words | 3 Pages

Oliver Wendell Holmes once wrote, “The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsly shouting in a theatre and causing panic.” Similarly, the Supreme Court’s ruling to arrest Schenck was wrong, and a U.S. citizen should be allowed to protest a war or draft in times of war. Specifically, the Espionage Act violated the first Amendment, Charles Schenck, whom was arrested after violating the Act, was indicting no violence, and the Act violated the 13th Amendment. First, citizens in the U.S. being allowed to protest wars or drafts specifically shines through since the Espionage Act violates the 13th Amendment.

Read More
338 Words | 2 Pages

Andrew Carnegie was one of the most famous and wealthiest American industrialist during the Industrial Age. He was a robber baron who made a fortune in the steel industry and applied vertical integration to his business. Carnegie contradicted his views as a robber baron because he supported, but destroyed many unions. This made many of his views unethical.

Read More
249 Words | 1 Pages

I don 't think of Edward Snowden as a hero or a traitor. I do think what he did was bad he informed the general public of what the federal government is doing and the people have the right to know. If my best friend 's girlfriend was cheating on him and I told him about it does that make me a traitor? that 's an over simplified comparison but the point is that we as people of the "free world" have the right to know. The federal government should not have the ability to monitor your activity without a warrant without a just cause.

Read More
266 Words | 2 Pages

Espionage and the Fourth Amendment are not compatible especially when people get accused for no legitimate reason. After the September 11 terrorist attack on the Twin Towers in New York. George W. Bush issued more policies to expand espionage agencies to ensure that future terrorist attacks can be prevented. Some people might argue that “preventing the loss of American lives requires some restriction of civil liberties” but other people say that “the war on terrorism is different from traditional wars and thus requires that government officials exercise special care to maintain civil liberties” (Espionage and Intelligence Gathering 114). Having civil liberties is one of the few rights that American citizens can have.

Read More
1016 Words | 5 Pages

Powerful Governments A government is to be in charge of the economic affairs, policy, and actions of a country. There are various types of governments, with laws and restrictions that citizens are to follow. These laws and restrictions can easily be taken to extremes as portrayed in George Orwell’s 1984.

Read More
917 Words | 4 Pages

The US government broke the law and for years, they hid their spying practices not just from the public, but from parliament. Without Snowden and other campaigners that followed, we wouldn’t have a clue what they were up to. According to eff.org, it is stated that, "information of the NSA's domestic spying programs are found in the media, official government statements and reports, and court actions. " This includes leaked documents, first published by The Guardian in June 2013, that confirmed the domestic spying by the NSA, as well as accounts based on unnamed government officials (eff.org).

Read More
1017 Words | 5 Pages

In the case of Edward Snowden and what he did is somewhat controversial. The controversy on this subject is that some think he should be punished for his actions and others think he should be free and have no charges. The people that think he shouldn’t be punished also think that the government is wrong for doing what it was doing. They also think he shouldn’t be punished for exposing something the government is doing that is against the law. Now if a person is in a government agency and is doing things to keep the mass majority safe will see him as a traitor and want him to be punished.

Read More
603 Words | 3 Pages

The NSA got away for breaking the law while Snowden was portrayed as a traitor to the entire country because he could not sit back and watch the U.S government destroy the privacy of its people. The NSA had gotten too powerful with its "massive surveillance machine" they are secretly building. After the terrorist attacks on september 11, 2001 happened, the NSA has used every chance they have been given to tell the public that what they are doing is for America’s benefit. Although this may of have been true at first, it certainly is not now. The Homeland security passed laws that were meant to prevent terrorist attacks by monitoring the phone calls of the citizenry for our safety.

Read More
882 Words | 4 Pages

Is Snowden playing the hero or the villain? Snowden is a criminal in the United States should he be pardoned or should he be criminalized for his action? It’s up to you to

Read More
1030 Words | 5 Pages

Civil liberties are rights guaranteed to citizens in the Constitution that the government cannot interfere with, however, in the name of national security, they do. The government sometimes finds it necessary for Americans to give up some of their basic rights to keep the nation protected, but many people find this unnecessary. A law-abiding citizen’s extremely personal information should not be essential to finding terroristic threats within this society. Under no circumstances should an American citizen’s civil liberties be violated in a time of war or crisis, because those are assured rights that are most valuable to their freedom during national conflicts.

Read More
1471 Words | 6 Pages

The main issue in the Snowden controversy is the conflicting rights of private individuals and the US government with regard to the use of telecommunications and the internet. There are ethical issues surrounding this controversy and the most applicable ethical approach for this case is “Ethics by Rights Approach”. As a background, the reason why US government had declared Edward Snowden a traitor is his involvement in the leaking of about 1.7 million confidential US documents, 15,000 Australian intelligence files and 58,000 British intelligence files from the National Security Agency (or NSA) to the public. These confidential information were acquired by the NSA through the PRISM program by collaborating with big internet companies such

Read More
389 Words | 2 Pages

After doing a research paper on Edward Snowden last year for another I have had my doubts about the rights and property of the citizens of the American people. Edward Snowden is the American

Read More
927 Words | 4 Pages

The Bill of Rights gives certain liberties to the people of the United States concerning privacy. While a government backdoor in the encryption can be an effective tool for certain agencies to gain access and knowledge of criminal activity, it can also be used to obtain information without a warrant. The Fourth Amendment gives the right to privacy and that a warrant explaining what law enforcement are to seize and the place being searched. The Patriot Act of 2001 “up new pathways for law enforcement to use emerging technologies in criminal cases without the suspects afforded their Fourth Amendment rights.” (Reitmayer) There should be many worries about this considering the recent leaks about the NSA collection activities.

Read More
943 Words | 4 Pages

On June 5, documents Snowden obtained were release in the United Kingdom’s Guardian newspaper. On June 14 Snowden was charged with theft of government property, unauthorized communication of national defense information, and willful communication of classified intelligence with an unauthorized person. Snowden’s response was "I 'm willing to sacrifice [my former life] because I can 't in good conscience allow the U.S. government to destroy privacy, internet freedom and basic liberties for people around the world with this massive surveillance machine they 're secretly building.” (Edward Snowden Biography). Here is a clear cut example of why the government should limit their use of surveillance.

Read More
992 Words | 4 Pages

Edward Snowden is either a hero who should be pardoned for his crimes or he is a traitor who should be punished. It is either one or the other. Why can he not be a hero that is prosecuted as well? A perfect example of this would be Nelson Mandela. He was arrested and imprisoned for 27 years for standing against his government because he believed what they were doing was wrong.

Read More

More about Why Is Edward Snowden Unethical

Related Topics

Open Document