By modern standards, John Brown’s actions at Pottawatomie creek and Harpers Ferry may appear to be acts of terrorism, but digging deeper into research will prove him a freedom fighter. Many aspects of Brown’s childhood affected his views and beliefs in his adulthood. John Brown acted the way he did at Pottawatomie creek and Harpers Ferry, because he wanted to end slavery. If Brown were to act this way today, his punishment would be drastically different. Based on various research Brown is a freedom fighter. John Brown had a strange childhood. His mother died when he was young. Brown was a Calvinist. Calvinists were strict about the way one should live their lives. They believed that the wealthy go to Heaven and the poor go to Hell. Brown was …show more content…
He acted several times to end slavery. One example of his fight against slavery is what he did at Pottawatomie Creek. When Brown went to Pottawatomie he acted cruelly, but he was justified in his actions. Brown’s actions were not appropriate, but since Brown was doing it for all of the right reasons, he was justified. If he were to do this today, he would be frowned upon. In his time, it was different to act this way. It was more common to act like an animal. Moreover, Brown raided Harpers Ferry; if he were to do that today, he would have been punished very differently. Brown died for this cause and that is something most people would not have done. John Brown’s actions at Harpers Ferry and Potawatomie Creek were justified and still would be justified in modern …show more content…
He was a part of some of those events. Based on various accounts, of what is considered terrorism in modern times, Brown is not a terrorist, but he is a freedom fighter. Many groups and individuals can be considered terrorists, but they must first generate fear. Brown did not construct fear when he fought for slavery. When Brown was in Pottawatomie Creek and Harpers Ferry, he did not try to scare anyone, but he did try to get his point across. A terrorist group called P.I.R.A. fought an insurgency that effectively changed British rule. They acted this way, because of conflict in Northern Ireland. Some may disagree with them, some may not, and it is a matter of opinion. John Brown is in the same boat with this group; he can only be judged by people’s opinions. P.I.R.A. was a terrorist group, Brown was not a