Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Book should not be banned
Importance of censorship in schools
Importance of censorship in schools
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Book should not be banned
Importance of censorship in schools
Importance of censorship in schools
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
If someone does not think people will like being called black, how do you think their going to react to being called the n-word. These are some of the few weaknesses is the book but that does not mean the whole book is
From complaints such as; this book is racist, and it is discrimination against “Black” people, the novel was removed from the Concord, Massachusetts, Public Library. (Apstein) In another case, the novel was marked as number five on the American Library Association’s “100 Most Frequently Challenged Books of 1990-1999.” (“Fight”) It isn’t shocking that the novel ended up on the list with all the misunderstandings that happened.
Profanity was used from Goddamn to F*** ***. But this shouldn’t be the only reason that the book should be banned. Other books such as To Kill a Mockingbird and The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn also use profanity, inappropriate, and sensitive language, but the books are arguably great books from its time and are a great learning tool, teaching about the relationship between the Blacks and Whites. The book also has
The book “The Hunger Games” by Suzanne Collins has caused quite a stir as people have challenged this book saying that it’s disrespectful to religion, desensitizes children, and so much more. Children reading these books are now not being affected as much by very gruesome violence and have nightmares because of the descriptiveness of these books, “a parent in New Hampshire challenged the Goffstown school board over Suzanne Collins’ The Hunger Games claiming it gave her 11-year-old nightmares and could numb children to violence”, ("Banned Books Week -The Hunger Games") claims like these has been undoubtedly the reason for the ban on this series in multiple countries and states. I personally believe this book should not be banned because though
It has very complex and touchy subjects in the story for example the book talks about rape and racism. It's not always easy for teachers to talk about it in schools because of the language used in the text. For some students the words used and actions said in the book are hard to hear and can make them uncomfortable. The book also does not explain the n-word is a derogatory word. How black characters are shown in the book is hurtful to black students' image of themselves and they can feel if it's pointed towards them.
Taking out details to make it seem less vulgar is just like ignoring a part of our history that needs to be learned from. On the other hand, some will say that this topic is extremely violent and should not be introduced to kids at such an early age. A source states that, “In addition to educational appropriateness and obscenity, valid legal reasons to ban books from public school libraries can include content that is considered defamatory, engenders hatred, or incites violence. For instance, a school book that contains hate speech or promotes violence against specific groups can be deemed inappropriate for school settings.” Prisoner B-3087 can seem a bit violent at times, which makes it understandable that some parents agree that this book should be banned.
The book was banned only after two months after being published, and received rude comments against it. The reason it is banned is because of racial influences towards Africans. This book was challenged in 1950 because most of these slurs were towards a certain character named Jim. This made
We know the parents argument, but what is the schools’? “There were complaints about it,” school board’s Vice president Kenny Holloway told the Sun Herald. “There is some language in the book that makes people uncomfortable, and we can teach the same lesson with other books.” (Zorthian.) The School simply is banning the book because they don’t want to offend students who may have closer ties to racism.
The book was challenged by a middle school in Brentwood, Tennessee in 2006 because the book contains “profanity” and “contains adult themes such as rape and incest.” The complaints also say that the book promotes “racial hatred, racial division, racial separation, and promotes white supremacy.” The people that say that are people that are trying to ‘protect’ other people from knowing and understanding what happened in the past because they believe that if they do know and understand what happened in the past then they will become racist and believe in white supremacy. These kinds of people are like the Holocaust deniers who believe that six million Jews where not murdered despite all of the evidence against that. George Santayana once said “Those who cannot remember the past are bound to repeat it.”
Profanity and racism take center stage in many of the conversations. A good example of this is Nurse Rached, primarily African American, being called “the black boys” and even “tar babies” at one point in the novel. (Kesley 16) The entire point of the black boys is to be the only ones unempathetic enough to carry out Nurse Rached's will, and all of them being black sends a harmful message. This racist wording is the same reason To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee has been banned.
It also caused people to see how unfair Pl slaves were treated which wasn't a good thing because the masters would be painted and criminals in the eyes of society. The use of the “n” word was a reason for the book to be banned because a parent wouldn't want their kids reading and learning about how their parents treated other human being. In all its glory, this book caused many disputes in the schools and in the houses in which it was being read because of the graphics that come along with the use of the “n”
To prove this point, I will be using the book in question, To Kill a Mockingbird, and an article by Pam Louwagie, “After dropping two books with racial slurs, a painful turning of the page in Duluth”. Schools being able to have the right to ban books based on the fact that these books make children of color uncomfortable because of the use of racial slurs is a sound and safe opinion. It brings comfort to anyone who finds the use of racial slurs disgusting. While all this is true, not teaching these controversial books is tiptoeing around the issue of race.
I disagree to this because To Kill a Mockingbird uses racist language for a reason. It is not intentionally calling the reader a n****r but to emphasize the use of racism in the early 30’s. The article, “The ironic, enduring legacy of banning ‘To Kill a Mockingbird’ for racist language” states that the book was not only banned for the use of racist language but because of the plot centering on rape. The article states “It was not images of race, but of sex, that caused the first big uproar. The school board of Hanover County, Va., banned the book as “immoral literature” in 1966 because the plot centered on rape.”
Many books are being banned because they discuss difficult topics that may make students uncomfortable. While these topics are difficult, they are also realistic and relevant to life. For example, To Kill A Mockingbird is a story of two kids watching their father, who is lawyer charged with defending a black man who was falsely accused of raping a white woman. This book was banned from a Mississippi school district because it “makes people uncomfortable” (Schaub). Racism and prejudice are generally uncomfortable topics, but that does not make them less relevant or important.
The number 1 banned book from schools and libraries is ‘This One Summer'. The reason is because parents believed that it should be banned due to explicit content. That is wrong because of so many reasons. One reason is that reading of any kind improves social and mental abilities. Another being that parents shouldn't be able to control what other people read.