ipl-logo

Ww2 Dbq Essay

522 Words3 Pages

In 1945, America used a new and controversial weapon to annihilate thousands of Japanese civilians to end World War II. Stretching from 1939 to 1945, WWII was a battle between the Axis and Allied powers. The Axis powers wanted to attack communists and imperialize nations. The Allied powers wanted to defend themselves against the Axis powers and protect their nation. The Allied powers defeated the Axis powers, but Japan continued to attack the Pacific coast. After Japan bombed Pearl Harbor, America decided they had to take drastic measures and bomb Hiroshima and Nagasaki to end the war. One argument about the bomb was that it was necessary to use it in order to end the war. Some Americans believed this because Japan had shown that they would …show more content…

If the war had not ended, "millions more Allied soldiers," would die, according to Ally Soldier William Guarnere in Document 6. If the bomb was not dropped, Allied soldiers would have to attack Tokyo, which would cause millions of casualties and continue the war. If the war continued and the soldiers attacked in Tokyo “casualties on both sides,” would have easily surpassed the number of deaths from the bomb, according to Bill Dietrich, a Seattle Times Reporter, in Document 7. America had to protect the lives of their soldiers, and they did so by dropping a bomb and ending a war. In short, the atomic bomb aided in the war ending and ultimately saved as many lives as it ended, therefore making it a necessary component for WWII. Some citizens believe this because Japan was nearing submission because of US attacks, so bombing them would be immoral and not needed. Bill Dietrich, a Seattle Times Reporter, claims in Document 7 that Japan was "ready to call it quits," and end the war. Over 60 of Japan's cities had been destroyed and island homes had been blockaded, so it seemed that Japan was ready to give up. The Soviet Union had even gotten involved in the war and attacked

Open Document