ipl-logo

Youtube Controversy

742 Words3 Pages

In September 2016, YouTube made what seemed like a policy change to the monetization on videos but it was actually a notification change of a policy that had been in effect for years. The changes revolve around an attempt by YouTube to make the platform more advertiser friendly. YouTube’s terms of service state what kinds of videos they won’t monetize. Most make sense, but the last one is causing a lot of controversy with content creators on the site.

• Sexually suggestive content, including partial nudity and sexual humor
• Violence, including display of serious injury and events related to violent extremism
• Inappropriate language, including harassment, profanity and vulgar language
• Promotion of drugs and regulated substances, …show more content…

The reason that last rule is causing distress is how broad and vague the rules are, and the enforcement of these rules has been just as vague with little to no communication from the website to clarify. It’s troubling since many YouTubers value commentary about current events and make videos to ensure the public is informed about stories from the news. It seems like YouTube is trying to censor content creators with their last clause “controversial or sensitive subjects.” Subjects that fall under those categories are the ones people want to make the most videos about to be sure the public is well-informed about what is happening, and removing monetization from them makes it so that content creators that talk about important issues lose money for doing …show more content…

Informing the public about current events is seen by some of them as a duty as well as a job. The results of this policy change are the problem, not the policy itself. By acting too quickly and demonetizing videos automatically, they are taking revenue away from the content creators which in turn makes it harder for them to continue making videos. The content creators may try to continue making videos but eventually, it’s not sustainable and their business fails. What seemed like a small issue, taking ads off of some videos, turns out to be a much bigger problem that if not corrected could close down many channels on

Show More
Related
1294 Words | 6 Pages

There is a fine line between things that the public should have under consideration when it comes to what should be censored and what has the right to uncensored things . In my opinion, the only limitation I think should be under consideration is the censorship of public nudity. One should not be able to breastfeed in public, have intercourse with another, running around naked, or “freeing the nipple”. These situations can occur without someone knowing so it is not one ’s fault to block that image as they casually pass the person down the street.

Read More
2950 Words | 12 Pages

Reiterating my point, Adults don’t need to be censored from what they hear or watch, what a citizen watches or hears should be optional. If the regulation was altered it would make the American people feel as if they have a right in the media to delegate what they want to

Read More
337 Words | 2 Pages

Last weekend the Fine Brothers, a duo popular for their react series on YouTube such as the ever popular Kids React, fell upon a ton of controversy when they announced they plan on trademarking “react” videos on YouTube. This would mean that YouTubers who want to make similar reaction videos would have to confer it with the Fine Bros and agree to share a portion of the video’s revenue with them. However, this did not sit well with the online community, as many of videos on YouTube and comment threads of Reddit went on to bash and shame the two. Although this trademark controversy can be thought of as a form of censorship for those who would like to make reaction videos on YouTube, this debacle is a huge misunderstanding due to the lack of

Read More
529 Words | 3 Pages

The ideas that are allowed for expression in these rules are decreasing because of the fall of academic freedom. Anne Neal provided an example to help explain this. In her example she claims that sexual jokes and unwanted flirtation are

Read More
1517 Words | 7 Pages

Censorship is dangerous, and too much of it can lead to an inevitable destruction of our

Read More
825 Words | 4 Pages

Despite the fact that censorship might never reach the level it has in Fahrenheit 451, it very well has already overtaken various media outlets such as television, internet videos, news articles, and books. One good example of censorship in modern times is on the YouTube platform itself. In October of 2015, a content

Read More
647 Words | 3 Pages

Censorship while having some good sides is mostly negative for the world. It's against the constitution. Censorship also censors minorities. While being controlled by big groups and the government. Hopefully in the future society will see how harmful censorship is in general.

Read More
928 Words | 4 Pages

By censoring them they deny their ability to freely express themselves as people and create huge controversy in the communities of many citizens. One example is comedian George Carlin who was forced to censor the content in his acts because people believed that it was too profane for his fans and other people in the audience. This, of course, created huge controversy due to the fact that forcing people to censor their words is a violation of their first amendment right to free speech. This was such a big deal because the people of America fought for years for that right. Another example is the riots and killings taking place in Ferguson, Missouri.

Read More
650 Words | 3 Pages

The use of profanity in a post- “7 dirty words” has rapidly increased the most on social media, Reppler’s May 2011 did a survey with 30000 Facebook users, which showed that 47% of Facebook users had some form of profanity on their walls. Another example of how ridiculous censorship has severely impacted people lives is how an Indiana high School student was expelled for saying the word “fuck” in a series of tweets on his twitter account. The exact tweet was "fuck is one of those fucking words you can fucking put anywhere in a fucking sentence and it still fucking makes sense”. Austin Caroll the high school senior who wrote this on twitter got expelled and the story went unnoticed, which indicated two things a good sign and a bad sign. The bad sign is that people can still have their lives ruined over the use of profanity but because the story wasn’t talked about in the media that much shows that public opinion towards profanity is becoming less and less against it.

Read More
969 Words | 4 Pages

If censorship did not exist, there would be an overwhelming amount of inappropriate content floating around. Censorship is here for a reason. It is not to just annoy people or make them fear their rights are being compromised, it is here to prevent certain audiences from seeing certain content. American children are now growing up in a society where they do not know life without the Internet. Teens are spending more than one-third of their

Read More
651 Words | 3 Pages

The primary step in First Amendment free speech analysis is to determine whether the statute is conduct based or content neutral, and then apply the proper level of scrutiny.(Burson v. Freeman, 504 USC 191, 197-198). The limitation of sex offenders’ ability to access certain commercial social networking sites is content neutral. There may be certain times that where the government’s regulation has an incidental affect on expression. A regulation that serves purposes unrelated to the content of expression is content neutral, even if it has an incidental effect on some speakers or messages. (Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc., 475 U.S. 41, 47-48 (1986).)

Read More
1393 Words | 6 Pages

YouTube is now the second most visited website in the world.1 YouTube’s growing prominence has led to a proliferation of independent news bloggers, many of whom are rapidly becoming extremely popular due to the dawn of the age of fake news. In this era of fake news, many people have become distrustful of the mainstream media and turned to other sources for analysis of big news events. There are now many channels exclusively on YouTube who are becoming people’s primary source of news, such as: Mark Dice, The Young Turks, and Alex Jones. Are these independent media channels worsening the problem of fake news, or helping to uncover the truth?

Read More
1624 Words | 7 Pages

This Youtube video emphasizes on how active people are on coming together on one subject-racism and as a community convicting these girls. One of the girls in the Youtube video was apologizing for being part of the racist rant video and just breaks down tries to explain that because it was posted on the Internet, anyone could view it and that was the worst part is she doesn't know how many people were affected by her comments. My goal is to stress on how privacy is impossible on Youtube and that you cannot have control over what you have already posted. Sites like Youtube are generally made for the public eye to view.

Read More
1686 Words | 7 Pages

There are many reasons why various organizations and people are censoring different kinds of topics; some people say it’s the right thing to do and others think its controversial to the first amendment.

Read More
832 Words | 4 Pages

Youtube is Right for Taking Down Peoples Videos Youtube is quickly becoming one of the biggest sources for news, education and entertainment for many people. However, many have criticized Youtube for not doing a good enough job of taking down content that violates its own guidelines.  I disagree.  Youtube does a great job managing its content.

Read More

More about Youtube Controversy

Related Topics

Open Document