Leader-Member Exchange Theory Essays

domain. Theories of leadership are developing and evolving since 1840’s with the occurrence of Great man theory, trait theories (1940’s-1950) and then contingency theories (1960’s), transactional and transformation theory of leadership (1970’s). From many centuries, all these leadership theories are an important resource of learning in reality as well as in practice. The prominent researchers and scholars of past and present time have

In the Leader–Member Exchange (LMX) theory of leadership, the quality of the exchange relationship between a leader and a particular member of a work unit, team or organization is the basic unit of analysis (dyad). In this article, we try to answer the question whether research on the various aspects of the exchange processes between leaders and their subordinates is consistent with the theoretical underpinnings of LMX theory. Our focus is on the similarities and differences between the theoretical

has been around since the beginning of time when “physicians were seen as the primary clinical leaders and decision makers and the nurses were seen as handmaidens

think the Leader Member Exchange Theory (LMX) is different from the other theories we have discussed in EL700 such as trait approach, skill approach and style approach. These are all focusing on characteristic and behaviors of the person with the positional power. LMX is not the leadership that is predicted by the leader or by the subordinate. The LMX is focusing on interactions between leaders and followers and that effective leadership comes from a vertical relationship between the leader and the

opinions, and theories, which may be helpful or limiting. Helpful because leadership offers a wide range of theories to choose from, and limiting because it may be difficult to decide which ones to use. Deciding which leadership theories to apply when making decisions about supervisor selections, or which assessments to use, would likely depend on the type of leader an organization needs or wants. For example, if an organization wants a supervisor that can interact with team members in a way that

considered in terms of exchange (Homans, 1961). Social Exchange Theory (SET) (Blau, 1964) proposes that relationships comprise of a series of interactions between two or more parties (Blau, 1964) that generate obligations (Emerson, 1976). This essay will provide an outline of the theoretical perspective concerning SET. The parties involved in exchange relationships include an employee’s supervisors, team, and the organisation itself. Within organisational literature exchange relationships are conceptualised

(1966) or have given lists of particular tasks which leaders should slot in to permit innovation to appear Amabile (1988). The hypothetical progress with in this area is weak as conventional headship approaches are relatively less relevant to innovation outcomes than to the explanation and prediction of productivity outcomes Waldman SE Bass (1991). Two existing headship approaches have been investigated i.e. Leader-member exchange (LMX) theory Dansereau, Graen & Haga (1975), Graen & Scandura (1987)

3.0 Dispersed Leadership Theory in Teams and organizational structures The proponents of the Concept of shared leadership like Day, Gronn, & Salas (2006), argue that leadership should not be conceptualized as a centralized downward vertical influence on subordinates and they should not be an appointed leader but leadership tasks and functions should be divided among sets of individuals who are acting as leaders. Secondly, with the prevalence and significance of team work in today’s work environment

characters and they act as leaders. They motivate other employees to achieve the target of specific goal of the organization. Leadership is possibly perceived and understands the phenomena of the (Burns, 2010). Naylor (1999) states that effective leadership has different characteristics such as passionate, visionary, creative, inspiring, flexible, innovative, imaginative, courageous, initiates change and experimental. The report will discuss about leadership, leadership theories, definition, styles of

When being a supervisor, you have a lot of responsibilities that you need to take on every day with the people who work for you. It is important that the supervisor always oversees the jobs/activities that are being performed and making decisions on what to do. When it comes to everything with being a supervisor, there are ten reasons the supervisor hat fits me just fine. The first one is having good behavior, which means that you need to be approachable in every situation. You want to be positive

Individual reflective essay The purpose of this essay is to deliver the self-reflection and self-assessment based on my performance as a leader and a member when working in a team. I would focus on the working team issues, together with the strength and weakness of group performance, and also include some solutions for our problem. Due to the requirement of my lecturer, we had to form a group by choosing a number randomly with the aim of giving us the real situation of group work in the real life

Leader-member exchange theory is another approach that conceptualizes leadership as a process that is centered on the interactions between leaders and followers. (Northouse p.137) While this approach is great in theory it does not always engage all members of the staff. Staff members who were unhappy with management or have a poor attitude towards their career/current position have the tendency to only do what is absolutely required to stay employed. Motivating this type of employee can be very

There are many theories that suggest that crime is constructed socially, or is a product of the society in which the crime is committed. One such theory, proposed by Robert Merton, is known as strain theory. While strain theory is a useful model for explaining how societal values can drive people to commit crimes, it has several flaws and does not focus on how laws are made and how this contributes to the formation of crime. While Merton suggests that laws are created from consensus within a society

variety of interpersonal communication between Josie Geller and the three girls Kristin, Kiersten and Gibbie. There are three basic communication skills that are prominent throughout the film, they include the social exchange theory, and the perception process. The social exchange theory suggests that people try to maintain relationships in which the benefits of the relationship will outweigh their costs (pg 291). In the case of Josie and the three girls, Josie knows that being friends with the girls

Interpersonal communication is intriguing and convincing to peruse. It is amazingly relatable to one's day-to-day life. As one peruses interpersonal communication, he or she may get himself or herself considering cases in day by day life and connections that specifically corresponds to most of the elements of interpersonal communication. I found the elements to be frightfully similar to how people use these elements to communicate with others. Interpersonal communication portrays the communication

No Deal, has seen the exchange theory at work. Contestants on the show want to win as much money as they possibly can in their briefcase but struggle to make decisions, knowing that they could potentially lose out on winning even more money from the banker, or in a different briefcase. On a larger scale, an example of exchange theory would be a nation voting for a president. These citizens want to vote for the candidate who will do more good than harm. The exchange theory is useful,

When it comes to justice, Polemarchus believes that justice is “…helping friends and harming enemies.”. Socrates questions this point of view because according to Polemarchus’ view point, only the people who are close to him and in his circle of friends would be worthy of any kind of Justice. Polemarchus is wrong in this viewpoint because if only the people that you know who are of your similar social status and you interact with on a day to day basis are considered friends, what of those that you

Summary Findings: The ABC data collection has helped me gain some insights on Oscar’s off task behavior. I noticed some patterns after carefully analyzing the raw data. One of the patterns that struck me most was Oscar got on task every time an adult took the initiative to redirect him either by touching his shoulder or speaking to him directly. Oscar responded to both cues effectively. When Oscar figures out there is no one praising him, commenting on his expected behavior, or encouraging him, then

Social Exchange Theory Generally accredited to sociologist George Homans, the Social Exchange Theory essentially defines the costs versus the rewards in any given relationship, relative to both parties. Individuals value relationships differently depending upon the benefits they will receive. For example, if Jake helps to tutor Jose in math, and in turn Jose helps Jake to get in shape, they are participating in a type of social exchange called a direct exchange. Both parties exchange costs

Main sociological themes identified Based on the theory of social exchange, human beings constantly evaluate benefits and costs and settle for a choice that favors them (Hill, 1992). As such, relationships are formed and maintained on the basis of reciprocity, when there are exchanged benefits and rewards. Hill (1992) elaborates that the mutuality in relationships should stem from the expectations of social behaviors, and it can be sustained only when relationships are built on trust and autonomy